Coin
Explanation
Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 21082. (Read 26710424 times)
August 11, 2015, 09:02:57 PM
August 11, 2015, 08:46:21 PM
Looks like we are setup for a stale few months. This is actually good news.
Low as possible
Long as possible
August 11, 2015, 08:44:21 PM
This has has everything to do with China dropping the dollar peg. Currency wars (where every player tries to LOSE) are great for Bitcoin.
It should make people rush to bitcoin - but it hasn't, historically. I think it is the block size.
Seriously, dude?
What makes you think the block size problem has been resolved?
Two pages of people saying this and not a single link.
Gut feeling.
August 11, 2015, 08:41:32 PM
This has has everything to do with China dropping the dollar peg. Currency wars (where every player tries to LOSE) are great for Bitcoin.
It should make people rush to bitcoin - but it hasn't, historically. I think it is the block size.
Seriously, dude?
What makes you think the block size problem has been resolved?
Two pages of people saying this and not a single link.
August 11, 2015, 08:02:54 PM
August 11, 2015, 07:02:58 PM
August 11, 2015, 06:39:14 PM
It seems to me that OKCoin BTC and Litecoin in general are leading BTC higher.
August 11, 2015, 06:19:22 PM
Finally we see another price rising after sideways for days. 
Nice 6$ rise today.
Nice 6$ rise today. 
August 11, 2015, 06:15:56 PM
270+ !!! WOOHOOO !!!!!
August 11, 2015, 06:02:55 PM
August 11, 2015, 05:39:15 PM
this Ethereum pump will end with a bitcoin pump like the LTC bubble did some weeks ago.
August 11, 2015, 05:38:51 PM
The reason could be that the block size controversy now seems to be resolved.
It's maybe a way away from being resolved, but it is being addressed.
Time for some serious mooning?
No, no first we need some trains!
Like this one! It's perfect!
I'm soooo glad I'm not the ticket conductor on that train, lol!
August 11, 2015, 05:30:00 PM
This has has everything to do with China dropping the dollar peg. Currency wars (where every player tries to LOSE) are great for Bitcoin.
It should make people rush to bitcoin - but it hasn't, historically. I think it is the block size.
August 11, 2015, 05:29:29 PM
The reason could be that the block size controversy now seems to be resolved.
It's maybe a way away from being resolved, but it is being addressed.
Time for some serious mooning?
No, no first we need some trains!
Like this one! It's perfect!
August 11, 2015, 05:29:03 PM
The reason could be that the block size controversy now seems to be resolved.
Nah, I don't think it has been resolved... but how the price could be influenced by this thing (I can't understand at all...).
That prolonged low quality debate has instilled doubt in the toe-dippers and bystanders. It was never catastrophic, but they wouldn't know.
Now it seems to be resolved, the latest news being miners voting with their proverbial feet, the comments in the coinbase transactions. So I think it is resolved, by new year we have larger max blocks, and first quarter of next year we will have a large block, and minimal orphaning.
Source please. I follow the bitcoin-dev mailing list and no news of a resolution has been mentioned.
August 11, 2015, 05:27:56 PM
This has has everything to do with China dropping the dollar peg. Currency wars (where every player tries to LOSE) are great for Bitcoin.
August 11, 2015, 05:19:42 PM
The reason could be that the block size controversy now seems to be resolved.
Nah, I don't think it has been resolved... but how the price could be influenced by this thing (I can't understand at all...).
That prolonged low quality debate has instilled doubt in the toe-dippers and bystanders. It was never catastrophic, but they wouldn't know.
Now it seems to be resolved, the latest news being miners voting with their proverbial feet, the comments in the coinbase transactions. So I think it is resolved, by new year we have larger max blocks, and first quarter of next year we will have a large block, and minimal orphaning.
August 11, 2015, 05:18:48 PM
Didn't it get addressed since the old proposal before the recent 8 MB one, mand ?
I dunno. I can barely keep up with it all.
China's expressed interest in 8mb blocks but not the doubling every two years that Gavin Andresen proposed.
Here's a quote from the XT github 'Please note that Bitcoin XT does not currently change anything about block size limits, although a future version might.'
Someone cleverer than me will be along to clarify eventually.
August 11, 2015, 05:16:14 PM
271
August 11, 2015, 05:12:00 PM
The reason could be that the block size controversy now seems to be resolved.
It's maybe a way away from being resolved, but it is being addressed.
Didn't it get addressed since the old proposal before the recent 8 MB one, mand ?
Jump to: