https://api.bitfinex.com/v1/trades/BTCUSD/
Only type of trade since flash crash is "buy"
Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 21078. (Read 26720832 times)
August 19, 2015, 12:56:46 PM
August 19, 2015, 12:49:43 PM
The Stamp bid wall is strengthening. Can't say the same for Finex, but unless you use Finex to trade I would recommend watching Stamp. It seems to act more consistently and be a better predictor. Just my opinion.
August 19, 2015, 12:15:39 PM
Who here has a strong preference for BitcoinBlockstream Edition AKA Bitcoin Core?
August 19, 2015, 12:10:54 PM
well .. so just sell until the price falls. time to buy will 
it's a really bad situation.
I would never say but now I say to everyone - sell everything until it's time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If in future still will have the Bitcoin price.. will be time to buy.
Banks want technologies blockchain, but not our bitcoin! they make our bitcoin or just use blockchain tech to transfer fiat money..
but chinese ****** can destroy everything... believe me!!
August 19, 2015, 12:03:07 PM
August 19, 2015, 12:01:17 PM
August 19, 2015, 11:57:39 AM
Or a half decent solution come out of the core team that addresses the need for bigger blocks but doesn't fork the network, raise the block size so large the spam bloat on the chain will render it humongous or move us from a team of core devs to two mavericks.
Would absolutely love for the core dev team to get on-board with bigger blocks and I'm sure most other people would too. Now that their bluff has been called, maybe we'll see them implement something.
Have I got my facts straight?
The XT devs want bigger blocks which increase at a humungous rate each year, to log every user's IP for blacklisting purposes, and to disable Tor use for wallets.
The core devs want to implement something called the Lightning Network and sidechains.
Are there any devs left who just want to increase the block size to 8MB and not tamper with anything else?
log everyone's IPs, blacklist and block tor?
thank to let me know, I will never use XT and will always fight it
August 19, 2015, 11:48:55 AM
August 19, 2015, 11:39:18 AM
First block https://blockchain.info/block/00000000000000000174419fa2ba5003e123dbd97c6982aff1863f016b04789d
I'm not sure that block is really an XT block. It was mined by Slush pool, which is still creating all version 3 blocks. That particular block has a bizarre version field for some reason.
I don't really think it's either - the version in that block is "536870919", where the version field in a normal block (up to now) has been 1, 2, or 3. I don't think any of the current BIP proposals or XT client creates weird versions like that, do they? I would have expected maybe "4". I confess that I have not looked at the XT code to see what it puts in the version field, but I would not expect what appears to be a large random number.
I think maybe the version field just got corrupted in that block somehow.
Try looking at that number in hex, and then referring to the specs.
i cannot find it in the code. currently i'm looking in block.h
anyone able to identifiy it within the code?
EDIT: was blind like a chicken. it is there.
/** Blocks with version fields that have these bits set activate the bigger-block fork */
const unsigned int SIZE_FORK_VERSION = 0x20000007;
const unsigned int SIZE_FORK_VERSION = 0x20000007;
August 19, 2015, 11:32:01 AM
First block https://blockchain.info/block/00000000000000000174419fa2ba5003e123dbd97c6982aff1863f016b04789d
I'm not sure that block is really an XT block. It was mined by Slush pool, which is still creating all version 3 blocks. That particular block has a bizarre version field for some reason.
I don't really think it's either - the version in that block is "536870919", where the version field in a normal block (up to now) has been 1, 2, or 3. I don't think any of the current BIP proposals or XT client creates weird versions like that, do they? I would have expected maybe "4". I confess that I have not looked at the XT code to see what it puts in the version field, but I would not expect what appears to be a large random number.
I think maybe the version field just got corrupted in that block somehow.
Try looking at that number in hex, and then referring to the specs.
August 19, 2015, 11:25:49 AM
Or a half decent solution come out of the core team that addresses the need for bigger blocks but doesn't fork the network, raise the block size so large the spam bloat on the chain will render it humongous or move us from a team of core devs to two mavericks.
Would absolutely love for the core dev team to get on-board with bigger blocks and I'm sure most other people would too. Now that their bluff has been called, maybe we'll see them implement something.
Have I got my facts straight?
The XT devs want bigger blocks which increase at a humungous rate each year, to log every user's IP for blacklisting purposes, and to disable Tor use for wallets.
The core devs want to implement something called the Lightning Network and sidechains.
Are there any devs left who just want to increase the block size to 8MB and not tamper with anything else?
August 19, 2015, 11:04:35 AM
Or a half decent solution come out of the core team that addresses the need for bigger blocks but doesn't fork the network, raise the block size so large the spam bloat on the chain will render it humongous or move us from a team of core devs to two mavericks.
Would absolutely love for the core dev team to get on-board with bigger blocks and I'm sure most other people would too. Now that their bluff has been called, maybe we'll see them implement something.
August 19, 2015, 11:04:29 AM
First block https://blockchain.info/block/00000000000000000174419fa2ba5003e123dbd97c6982aff1863f016b04789d
I'm not sure that block is really an XT block. It was mined by Slush pool, which is still creating all version 3 blocks. That particular block has a bizarre version field for some reason.
It is an XT block. Sadly.
Version: 536870919(10) = 0x20000007 (hex)
Edit: Sorry, someone on reddit said that, not Slush. https://www.reddit.com/r/bitcoinxt/comments/3hhbm5/first_mined_xt_block_370434/
source?
Sorry, edited my post. It was just someone on reddit. *Shame on me*
August 19, 2015, 11:03:06 AM
August 19, 2015, 10:59:04 AM
First block https://blockchain.info/block/00000000000000000174419fa2ba5003e123dbd97c6982aff1863f016b04789d
I'm not sure that block is really an XT block. It was mined by Slush pool, which is still creating all version 3 blocks. That particular block has a bizarre version field for some reason.
It is an XT block. Sadly. Slush confirmed it, saying they allowing miners to choose and using v3 for core blocks and 536870919 for XT blocks.
Version: 536870919(10) = 0x20000007 (hex)
source?
August 19, 2015, 10:58:21 AM
234 on Stamp now. Did we see the bottom a number of hours ago? I think the day opened at 224 so have we found the bottom? I'd really like it if we didn't go any lower than 220. Anybody got an opinion? Could we go any lower than 220?
don't modify the result with the answer to your question dude!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schrödinger%27s_cat
August 19, 2015, 10:57:55 AM
First block https://blockchain.info/block/00000000000000000174419fa2ba5003e123dbd97c6982aff1863f016b04789d
I'm not sure that block is really an XT block. It was mined by Slush pool, which is still creating all version 3 blocks. That particular block has a bizarre version field for some reason.
It is an XT block. Sadly.
Version: 536870919(10) = 0x20000007 (hex)
Edit: Sorry, someone on reddit said that, not Slush. https://www.reddit.com/r/bitcoinxt/comments/3hhbm5/first_mined_xt_block_370434/
August 19, 2015, 10:55:15 AM
234 on Stamp now. Did we see the bottom a number of hours ago? I think the day opened at 224 so have we found the bottom? I'd really like it if we didn't go any lower than 220. Anybody got an opinion? Could we go any lower than 220?
August 19, 2015, 10:41:18 AM
First block https://blockchain.info/block/00000000000000000174419fa2ba5003e123dbd97c6982aff1863f016b04789d
I'm not sure that block is really an XT block. It was mined by Slush pool, which is still creating all version 3 blocks. That particular block has a bizarre version field for some reason.
I don't really think it's either - the version in that block is "536870919", where the version field in a normal block (up to now) has been 1, 2, or 3. I don't think any of the current BIP proposals or XT client creates weird versions like that, do they? I would have expected maybe "4". I confess that I have not looked at the XT code to see what it puts in the version field, but I would not expect what appears to be a large random number.
I think maybe the version field just got corrupted in that block somehow.
August 19, 2015, 10:28:00 AM
First block https://blockchain.info/block/00000000000000000174419fa2ba5003e123dbd97c6982aff1863f016b04789d
I'm not sure that block is really an XT block. It was mined by Slush pool, which is still creating all version 3 blocks. That particular block has a bizarre version field for some reason.
Jump to: