oh come on! such ludicrous BS downloading 20MB is SOOOOOOOOO costly
“A very large block size would be problematic for miners because the network bandwidth between China, where the majority of mining is done, and rest of the world is heavily restricted. Important proposals like these need to factor in all of the nuances of the global landscape.”
the bandwidth between China and rest of the world is <20MB every 10 mins?
I think the problem the Chinese miners are concerned about is that, because of their lower bandwidth, they are already at a bit of a disadvantage with block propagation time, which increases the likelihood that their mined blocks may be orphaned - and increasing the block size increases that problem.
no it doesn't tho, just because the block size limit is higher doesn't mean network traffic is going to jump up dramatically...
nothing is going to change, their arguments are based on hypothetical nonsense.
Increasing the chance a block will be orphaned doesn't require that 'network traffic jump up', it just requires that that one block be propagated to the network more slowly than another simultaneous block.
20Mb Block capacity is not 20MB block tragic, its just preparation for the next growth spurt, if we cant handle 20x the amount of users (more like 8x the number of users now) and traffic its going to be a little disappointing, moving you BTC is going to be like having Gox coins when the network jams up. Once the new 20x user realize how shit it is to use, demand will dry up, and your transactions will clear.
Shit thing is having coins stuck in the network won't allow you to sell, - best we keep the 1MB limit, and you all move your coins to Coinbase, OKCoin and Bitfenix, hope they don't Gox, and sell off chain at the peek to the next bag holder who wont be able to move them.
Who needs a functioning Bitcoin anyway, well have SideChains and Coinbase and Circle, we can just use that, it'll be better.