Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 22809. (Read 26713541 times)

legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
Which would y'all rather have as a neighbor, a racist sexist homophobic who believes in the NonAggression Principle or an egalitarian who wants to make everyone equal by sticking guns in their faces?

I'd like to have you as a neighbor. Your ability to put succinctly into words what I've been thinking anyway makes me happy. One day I will repay you by buying you an evenings worth of beer or whatever drug of your choice  Cheesy

was that gay? I think this was a bit gay. Hope you don't hate me now  Shocked

It's a deal! And just so you know, I think gays should be free to do whatever the hell they want as long as it doesn't hurt anybody (unless you're into that), but I have a right to be grossed out by it.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 254
...I'm talking about initiating physical violence or threat of violence, and I'd like to hear someone make an argument defending doing that...

I lived in several US states allowing me to use violence to protect my property.  You [nonviolently] come on my property, I shoot you in the face.
What's wrong with that?

Err points lost. I'd rather have some intelligent troll posts.

No.  "Violence" is not binary, it's very creepy and analog-gradienty.  Theft is violence.  Farting through silk and not sharing while others starve is violence.  Private property is violence.  Violence begets violence.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 254
...I'm talking about initiating physical violence or threat of violence, and I'd like to hear someone make an argument defending doing that...

I lived in several US states allowing me to use violence to protect my property.  You [nonviolently] come on my property, I shoot you in the face.
What's wrong with that?

That's why I very specifically wrote "INITIATING" physical violence. Self defense and defense of one's property is not initiation. Can you fucking read or do I have to ignore you again?

By being a sexist bigot you are initiating violence.  Stop triggering me brah.  Clearly I wouldn't shoot you in the face unless you incited & richly deserved it.
legendary
Activity: 1133
Merit: 1163
Imposition of ORder = Escalation of Chaos
Which would y'all rather have as a neighbor, a racist sexist homophobic who believes in the NonAggression Principle or an egalitarian who wants to make everyone equal by sticking guns in their faces?

I'd like to have you as a neighbor. Your ability to put succinctly into words what I've been thinking anyway makes me happy. One day I will repay you by buying you an evenings worth of beer or whatever drug of your choice  Cheesy

was that gay? I think this was a bit gay. Hope you don't hate me now  Shocked
full member
Activity: 141
Merit: 100
...I'm talking about initiating physical violence or threat of violence, and I'd like to hear someone make an argument defending doing that...

I lived in several US states allowing me to use violence to protect my property.  You [nonviolently] come on my property, I shoot you in the face.
What's wrong with that?

Err points lost. I'd rather have some intelligent troll posts.
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1011

you cant really be sexist/homophob/racist and a nonagression believer at the same time because being sexist/homophob/racist implies aggression.

How do you figure? Does not associating or wanting to associate with people do violence to them? Am I aggressed against if someone doesn't invite me to a party? Ask me to marry her? Hire me? Give me a loan?

If so, then you seem to have a different understanding of "aggression" than me. I'm talking about initiating physical violence or threat of violence, and I'd like to hear someone make an argument defending doing that.
However, if you agree that that type of aggression is bad, then anything else is changing the subject.



well, telling other people that their languages are some form of "tribal grunt" is a form of aggression in my book. that kind of verbal aggression usually precedes the actual act of physical aggression because that idea is based usually on a concept of a superiority of some sort.

just like the nazis claimed that their race is superior to others and used that construct as an argument to kill 5 mil of jews, you are claiming that you are living in an english dominated world and all non english talkers should suck your dick.
    
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
how's the bear whale wars going today everybody ?? are we about to get dumped on by another 'chinese miner' again or are we doing a bear short squeeze again today ??
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
...I'm talking about initiating physical violence or threat of violence, and I'd like to hear someone make an argument defending doing that...

I lived in several US states allowing me to use violence to protect my property.  You [nonviolently] come on my property, I shoot you in the face.
What's wrong with that?

That's why I very specifically wrote "INITIATING" physical violence. Self defense and defense of one's property is not initiation. Can you fucking read or do I have to ignore you again?

I'm not going to argue over exactly how much defensive force is justifiable in a given hypothetical case. There are always borderline cases that will be decided differently in different places, times and circumstances. People have rights, including the right to defend those rights up to the point just shy of violating somebody else's rights.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 254
...I'm talking about initiating physical violence or threat of violence, and I'd like to hear someone make an argument defending doing that...

I lived in several US states allowing me to use violence to protect my property.  You [nonviolently] come on my property, I shoot you in the face.
What's wrong with that?
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
Moderator
How is that possible?
Anyone to explain?


Hello TheXpert,

I will write you a PM for more details on whats next, but for everyone here is what happened. We are currently testing a new trading engine on DRKUSD and DRKBTC pairs only. Initially this engine used a feedback loop to confirm new balances after exchange execution. Problem was when you inserted the same type of orders for the same account in between this loop, like your bot was doing by sending the same marketable orders over and over, the exchange balance checking would be screwed and allow for a negative balance before catching up with your actual balance.
This wasn't such a serious problem anyway as there was a circuit breaker in place that would limit any possible negative loss to a maximum of 1,000 usd.

Anyways this has now been corrected (this was the purpose of testing on very small volume pairs like DRK). Your bot has been very useful in this regard.

Have a good day
Raphael
Bitfinex team

Lulz, again. Implement things on a live system...
I think i can remember at least of one other exchange(RxIxP) that liked to do it that way....
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women

you cant really be sexist/homophob/racist and a nonagression believer at the same time because being sexist/homophob/racist implies aggression.

How do you figure? Does not associating or wanting to associate with people do violence to them? Am I aggressed against if someone doesn't invite me to a party? Ask me to marry her? Hire me? Give me a loan?

If so, then you seem to have a different understanding of "aggression" than me. I'm talking about initiating physical violence or threat of violence, and I'd like to hear someone make an argument defending doing that.
However, if you agree that that type of aggression is bad, then anything else is changing the subject.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
Bullish - Another Wall Street Journal Mention


February 23, 2015 4:04 AM
Rakuten ‘Probably’ to Accept Bitcoin
By TAKASHI MOCHIZUKI

Japanese e-commerce giant Rakuten is considering accepting the virtual currency bitcoin as payment, founder and Chief Executive Hiroshi Mikitani said.
“We are thinking about it, and we probably will,” Mr. Mikitani said at the Rakuten Financial Conference in Tokyo, where panelists discussed crypto-currencies and other alternatives to cash and credit cards. “We would like to be open.”
Mr. Mikitani declined to specify when the company might decide, saying it was a trade secret.

Rakuten is one of the largest Japanese companies to take an interest in bitcoin and other digital currencies. It has formed a department to study digital currencies and invested in bitcoin-related ventures in the U.S., including San Francisco-based Bitnet Technologies.
The number of bitcoin-related startups is rising in Japan, despite the failure last year of Tokyo-based Mt. Gox, then the world’s largest bitcoin exchange. They include BitBank Inc and Resu Press Inc., which offer user platforms for retailers and individuals.
Bitcoin’s development in Japan has been supported by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s Liberal Democratic Party, which last year helped launch the industry’s self-governing body, the Japan Authority of Digital Assets.
Still, bitcoin’s use by bigger companies such as Rakuten is important for consumer confidence it bitcoin is to go mainstream, said Yukio Noguchi, an economist who used to be a Ministry of Finance bureaucrat.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-JRTB-19290



Another company that accepts Bitcoin USD from a bitcoin dump?




I care.

Willy lived in Japan. He made everyone rich, for a few months.

This is a step towards Free Willy day.
legendary
Activity: 3556
Merit: 9709
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
Good morning gentlemen!

5 o'çlock evening where i am.

Thanks for that win over saints yesterday!

All in a good days work!
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 254
(...)
Confirming what Ramsay said: good to read your stuff in this sea of troll bile.


I guess fucking your mom technically does make me a motherfucker, but thank you for improving the level of discourse. I fixed it. Are you happy now? Oh wait, your..you'are...ah yer still waiting on sub $200 coins. No wonder y....yous...y'all are so grumpy. Gotcher coinz, Bitchez!
Your critique is so stale it only merits an ad hominem attack. The reason I never learned whatever tribal grunts is your native tongue is because I don't have to. English speakers rule the planet. And I'm drunk too so back at ya, you foreign fucking foreigner fuck.

Great post, NotHatinJustTrollin, excellent!  
Should be stickied.
If you could maybe just work in some text effects--oh, green and red bold font, maybe--would be best post ever.
Glad there's still intelligent content in this cesspool of bull_shit. 
I'll compliment you for having opinions which resemble my own again, from an alt account.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 254

Freedom means freedom to shoot unpleasant people in the face.  Don't tell me what freedom means, you ain't the boss of me, I do what I want!


You have a weird perspective of what freedom is...  

How so?
*And glad you got the reference, but don't spoil it for other kids.
legendary
Activity: 1281
Merit: 1046
I find it very interesting that right before an auction that could dump this trash to sub $200, a fucking lunatic named "silverfuture" comes in here and tries to convince people to buy more bitcoins.



2. Put duplicate private keys in cold storage in multiple safe locations and forget about them for a while.

 

Another example of a goofy boy that won the bitcoin lottery and now thinks he's relevant enough for me to care what he says. The saddest part is that people who bought at $500-$1200 actually bow to this early adopter lunatic whose fortune increases only if he manages to convince delusional get'rich'quick animals to buy more.
hero member
Activity: 577
Merit: 500
Jesus was a (Goddamn) hippy socialist

Freedom means freedom to shoot unpleasant people in the face.  Don't tell me what freedom means, you ain't the boss of me, I do what I want!


You have a weird perspective of what freedom is...  


legendary
Activity: 961
Merit: 1000
Right now Bitcoins seems to be an answer in search of a problem: Most obviously capital controls in a world where capital is still largely mobile. When this situation changes, it is likely to be sudden and swift although the time frame is difficult to predict with any accuracy.

I think this is a prescient point. Because we are in such high stakes uncharted economic territory, having a stake in bitcoin (say 1-5% of net worth) is a good idea. Global extended QE, ZIRP, NIRP and currency wars mean the risk of a SHTF moment have increased. If that moment is a sovereign default, a large de-pegging, increasing deflation or capital controls, the consequences will be wide ranging. And thats the thing with many of these events; they happen very quickly. Take the Swiss de-pegging a few weeks back knocking out large trading firms. All of a sudden, and in stark oppostion to the statements from the SCB a few days earlier, shit changed instantly.

No one knows what effect a SHTF moment will have on safe havens like gold or USD or on speculations like bitcoin, but the upside if it reflects positively is enormous.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 254
...
Which would y'all rather have as a neighbor, a racist sexist homophobic who believes in the NonAggression Principle or an egalitarian who wants to make everyone equal by sticking guns in their faces?

Depends on my race, sex, and social standing.  Niggers, bitches, faggots and brokesss poor would chose egalitarian.  If you're asking about me in particular, point taken, I'd rather have you.

Quote
Freedom means you have to put up with some unpleasant people with unpleasant ideas, but you don't have to put up with threats of violence by those who claim to be peaceful while having the State do their dirty work for them.
...

Freedom means freedom to shoot unpleasant people in the face.  Don't tell me what freedom means, you ain't the boss of me, I do what I want!

Good morning, gentlemen.
Jump to: