Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 24113. (Read 26608439 times)
December 06, 2014, 02:23:15 PM
uh, why is ripple pumping? They are experiencing a devastating ledger fork and may have to change consensus systems. These markets continue to amaze me. Bizzaro world
December 06, 2014, 02:21:53 PM
Didn't see that coming
Apparently you don't see much coming, based on your bearish outlook.
That remains to be seen
Yes, it does. Out of interest, what price are you waiting for? $350 $300 $275 $200?
For the next leg down, *if* it happens, I would guess that would be around the mid 200's within the next 2-3 months tops
And if you are wrong, what price will you say, it's bullish. Say we never go below $350 again and subsequently we hit $500 before Christmas, will you decide it's bullish medium and long term?
December 06, 2014, 02:19:38 PM
Do something, gentlemen, before We're forced to shake the box 
~Your Beneficent Reptilian Overlords.
~Your Beneficent Reptilian Overlords.
December 06, 2014, 02:17:20 PM
Didn't see that coming
Apparently you don't see much coming, based on your bearish outlook.
That remains to be seen
Yes, it does. Out of interest, what price are you waiting for? $350 $300 $275 $200?
For the next leg down, *if* it happens, I would guess that would be around the mid 200's within the next 2-3 months tops
December 06, 2014, 02:15:08 PM
(I tried)
Nice picture Adam, err sorry I mean fatman3001...
I wish, Adam is a divine entity.
You could have just deleted my post!
December 06, 2014, 02:12:16 PM
(I tried)
Nice picture Adam, err sorry I mean fatman3001...
I wish, Adam is a divine entity.
December 06, 2014, 02:07:03 PM
(I tried)
Nice picture Adam, err sorry I mean fatman3001...
December 06, 2014, 02:05:24 PM
Didn't see that coming
Apparently you don't see much coming, based on your bearish outlook.
That remains to be seen
Yes, it does. Out of interest, what price are you waiting for? $350 $300 $275 $200?
December 06, 2014, 02:00:54 PM
December 06, 2014, 02:00:17 PM
http://stpetersburgbowl.com/ <----- this is the one we have been gentleman!
December 06, 2014, 01:57:29 PM
Didn't see that coming
Apparently you don't see much coming, based on your bearish outlook.
That remains to be seen
December 06, 2014, 01:56:26 PM
Didn't see that coming
Apparently you don't see much coming, based on your bearish outlook.
December 06, 2014, 01:55:08 PM
sigh....
You posted this article, and tried to make out like it was in someway correct, people pointed out that it was not, myself included and I quote "I think you will find he copied the headline and pasted from here" note the same headline , to the piece you posted originally... the headline from July, stating that draper had won, that is what this was about right??
He was not even bidding for the entire lots, the headline was old... and the articles, written yesterday or not, were full of shit..
I think I have my facts in order, and really I am not sure what you are trying to say? I am saying headline old, draper did not win the entire second auction, and it was obvious from the get go that the article with old headline was full of shit.
That is all.
I said the article was posted on the day of the second auction and it was. I'm not responsible for the content whether it's rehashed or not.
But don't you think it's relevant to point it out?
I did on the original post, with the "!?" symbol.
(I tried)
December 06, 2014, 01:54:06 PM
Do something, gentlemen, before We're forced to shake the box
~Your Beneficent Reptilian Overlords.
~Your Beneficent Reptilian Overlords.
December 06, 2014, 01:53:05 PM
The dreaded weekend begins. Now to wait and see if it can hold over 350.
December 06, 2014, 01:51:38 PM
Ripple to the moon 
There is only one mooncoin. It's not ripple.
December 06, 2014, 01:48:57 PM
No conference ever did something really significant with the price.
The one in Prague November 2011 turned the tides imo.
Nowadays: there's so many of these conferences...
December 06, 2014, 01:48:33 PM
December 06, 2014, 01:45:59 PM
sigh....
You posted this article, and tried to make out like it was in someway correct, people pointed out that it was not, myself included and I quote "I think you will find he copied the headline and pasted from here" note the same headline , to the piece you posted originally... the headline from July, stating that draper had won, that is what this was about right??
He was not even bidding for the entire lots, the headline was old... and the articles, written yesterday or not, were full of shit..
I think I have my facts in order, and really I am not sure what you are trying to say? I am saying headline old, draper did not win the entire second auction, and it was obvious from the get go that the article with old headline was full of shit.
That is all.
I said the article was posted on the day of the second auction and it was. I'm not responsible for the content whether it's rehashed or not.
But don't you think it's relevant to point it out?
I did on the original post, with the "!?" symbol.
December 06, 2014, 01:44:39 PM
Oh no, not this again
Just accept being wrong jonoiv, it can be liberating, try it
You can try to get me to say it wasn't posted on that date as much as you like... but google, google web cache, dns records and any other tools you want to try say it was posted on 4th Dec.
Jump to: