sigh....
You posted this article, and tried to make out like it was in someway correct, people pointed out that it was not, myself included and I quote "I think you will find he copied the headline and pasted from here" note the same headline , to the piece you posted originally... the headline from July, stating that draper had won, that is what this was about right??
He was not even bidding for the entire lots, the headline was old... and the articles, written yesterday or not, were full of shit..
I think I have my facts in order, and really I am not sure what you are trying to say? I am saying headline old, draper did not win the entire second auction, and it was obvious from the get go that the article with old headline was full of shit.
That is all.
I said the article was posted on the day of the second auction and it was. I'm not responsible for the content whether it's rehashed or not.
But don't you think it's relevant to point it out?