When you said this, I was like "wait what the fuck, handbags? WTF is this guy talking about there was no mention of handbags in that article" and NOW I realize that you were responding to ANOTHER post, when I had ASSUMED you were responding to the post (and link) directly above your original comment. EDIT: I thought you were saying "I disagree with this person, must have been a woman" and in reality you were talking about handbags.
Well golly gee don't I have egg on my face? I shall leave my previous posts for my own maximum embarrassment (unless you'd prefer I delete them since I am coming at you pretty hard in them, for what now appears to be no fucking reason).
In short: My bad, I apologize.
It's all good. But I don't remember enough about the context to correct you or not on what I was replying to. It was more about the article itself though where the author (who was a woman) was talking about streamlining stuff. Which men typically do anyway (Though I have known women who do and men who don't so there is some stereotyping I admit). Though it is interesting that she picked on messenger bags (which many men eschew) when the more typical and more gender-normal-acceptable version would be the backpack which serves much the same purpose but is viewed in a different light. But it's late and I'm waffling so I'll shut up now.
Don't worry, I looked back, corrected myself, and it's all good.
If you're curious, it appears you were replying to a post quoting someone talking about putting away the handbags and messenger bags (not exact wording, and I think they were themselves quoting the opening to an article) from two pages before your post, and by complete coincidence your reply happened to be right under a link to an entirely different article that does not at all mention handbags.
