Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 24279.

macsga

legendary

Activity: 1484

Merit: 1002

Strange, yet attractive.

Quote from: NotLambchop on November 25, 2014, 05:49:54 PM

Quote from: jonoiv on November 25, 2014, 05:43:47 PM

...
Finally 1 person that understands

Quick, sell him your coin before he smartens up!!1! Greater fools don't grow on trees you know.
...or do they?

Your loneliness must be unbearable with all us fool bitcoiners in here. I sometimes wonder what a monster of IQ like you doing with some dumbasses like us. Why don't you try to communicate with any superior species on another forum, than the average monkey you meet in BTCTalk? I mean, it must be intolerable for you. I don't know if you can handle it any longer...

Just saying... Roll Eyes

jonoiv

hero member

Activity: 966

Merit: 526

🐺Dogs for President🐺

Quote from: SkyValeey on November 25, 2014, 05:48:28 PM

Quote from: Wilhelm on November 25, 2014, 05:42:08 PM

Quote from: spooderman on November 25, 2014, 05:33:30 PM

sorry to troll the wall thread with this but let's put this to bed.

he said "2300 > soon"

This is an (albeit inelegant) way of saying that soon the price will be less than 2300.

The phrasing is weird I agree, however it is correct (the logic, not the prediction, I actually don't think we'll go much lower than right now).

You seem to disagree with his using > instead of <.

If he had said 2300 < soon then.....ahhh I give up, I think I'm being trolled Sad

As stated by Albert Einstein "You can't measure a fish by it's ability to climb a tree."

"2300" and "soon" are not comparable.

It doesn't matter. Language is not pure logic. 90%+ of language isn't. (for joniv "90%+" = not more than 90% but 10% LOL)

You can't understand 2300> soon in another way like "soon will be less than 2300".

Why?

Because of place of number and meaning of > <

Jonoiv is kid or he's stupid or he acts like he is wiser than everyone or he's stupid high kid acting wise man

why try and reverse use a symbol when you could have just used the correct one which is < less than, and put it in the correct place.

Just admit you made a mistake and finally move on with your life Cheesy

spooderman

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 1045

something wrong with the data feed from stamp

jaberwock

legendary

Activity: 2772

Merit: 1127

Quote from: ChartBuddy on November 25, 2014, 05:01:10 PM

Explanation

why the charts are so weird last days?

NotLambchop

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 254

Quote from: jonoiv on November 25, 2014, 05:43:47 PM

...
Finally 1 person that understands

Quick, sell him your coin before he smartens up!!1! Greater fools don't grow on trees you know.
...or do they?

SkyValeey

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 500

Quote from: Wilhelm on November 25, 2014, 05:42:08 PM

Quote from: spooderman on November 25, 2014, 05:33:30 PM

sorry to troll the wall thread with this but let's put this to bed.

he said "2300 > soon"

This is an (albeit inelegant) way of saying that soon the price will be less than 2300.

The phrasing is weird I agree, however it is correct (the logic, not the prediction, I actually don't think we'll go much lower than right now).

You seem to disagree with his using > instead of <.

If he had said 2300 < soon then.....ahhh I give up, I think I'm being trolled Sad

As stated by Albert Einstein "You can't measure a fish by it's ability to climb a tree."

"2300" and "soon" are not comparable.

It doesn't matter. Language is not pure logic. 90%+ of language isn't. (for joniv "90%+" = not more than 90% but 10% LOL)

You can't understand 2300> soon in another way like "soon will be less than 2300".

Why?

Because of place of number and meaning of > <

Jonoiv is kid or he's stupid or he acts like he is wiser than everyone or he's stupid high kid acting wise man

jonoiv

hero member

Activity: 966

Merit: 526

🐺Dogs for President🐺

Quote from: Wilhelm on November 25, 2014, 05:42:08 PM

Quote from: spooderman on November 25, 2014, 05:33:30 PM

sorry to troll the wall thread with this but let's put this to bed.

he said "2300 > soon"

This is an (albeit inelegant) way of saying that soon the price will be less than 2300.

The phrasing is weird I agree, however it is correct (the logic, not the prediction, I actually don't think we'll go much lower than right now).

You seem to disagree with his using > instead of <.

If he had said 2300 < soon then.....ahhh I give up, I think I'm being trolled Sad

As stated by Albert Einstein "You can't measure a fish by it's ability to climb a tree."

"2300" and "soon" are not comparable.

Thank You!

Finally 1 person that understands

jonoiv

hero member

Activity: 966

Merit: 526

🐺Dogs for President🐺

Quote from: SkyValeey on November 25, 2014, 05:40:55 PM

Well I'm happy that on the other side of exchanges there're people with another kind of math

Another rule of that ppl is probably buy high sell low...

Wilhelm

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1265

Quote from: spooderman on November 25, 2014, 05:33:30 PM

sorry to troll the wall thread with this but let's put this to bed.

he said "2300 > soon"

This is an (albeit inelegant) way of saying that soon the price will be less than 2300.

The phrasing is weird I agree, however it is correct (the logic, not the prediction, I actually don't think we'll go much lower than right now).

You seem to disagree with his using > instead of <.

If he had said 2300 < soon then.....ahhh I give up, I think I'm being trolled Sad

As stated by Albert Einstein "You can't measure a fish by it's ability to climb a tree."

"2300" and "soon" are not comparable.

SkyValeey

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 500

Well I'm happy that on the other side of exchanges there're people with another kind of math

Another rule of that ppl is probably buy high sell low...

jonoiv

hero member

Activity: 966

Merit: 526

🐺Dogs for President🐺

Quote from: spooderman on November 25, 2014, 05:33:30 PM

sorry to troll the wall thread with this but let's put this to bed.

he said "2300 > soon"

This is an (albeit inelegant) way of saying that soon the price will be less than 2300.

The phrasing is weird I agree, however it is correct (the logic, not the prediction, I actually don't think we'll go much lower than right now).

You seem to disagree with his using > instead of <.

If he had said 2300 < soon then.....ahhh I give up, I think I'm being trolled Sad

No it isn't...

"soon" is an estimate of time.

2300 > soon

He said 2300 (greater than) some time in the near future.

His explination of 2300 > x. does not work because soon is not a unit of measurement for bitcoin price.

soon is not unit, so therefore there is no way a greater than symbol can be used here.

He meant to say < 2300 soon.

Regardless, the price was 2308. So making such a massive prediction hardly makes him the Oracle of Delphi!

spooderman

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 1045

sorry to troll the wall thread with this but let's put this to bed.

he said "2300 > soon"

This is an (albeit inelegant) way of saying that soon the price will be less than 2300.

The phrasing is weird I agree, however it is correct (the logic, not the prediction, I actually don't think we'll go much lower than right now).

You seem to disagree with his using > instead of <.

If he had said 2300 < soon then.....ahhh I give up, I think I'm being trolled Sad

jonoiv

hero member

Activity: 966

Merit: 526

🐺Dogs for President🐺

Quote from: spooderman on November 25, 2014, 05:24:14 PM

If you don't understand English or maths...

spooderman

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 1045

jonoiv

hero member

Activity: 966

Merit: 526

🐺Dogs for President🐺

Quote from: spooderman on November 25, 2014, 05:19:03 PM

Quote from: jonoiv on November 25, 2014, 05:17:02 PM

Quote from: spooderman on November 25, 2014, 05:09:31 PM

jonoiv you just failed so hard. wow.

> Greater than

< Less than

Problem?

Yes, someone has already explained that he used the correct symbol :S

He was trying to say the price will drop. and used the > greater than symbol

he said

2300 > (greater than) soon.

tell me how that means the price will be less than 2300?

No.. exactly!

He could have said

Price sub 2300 soon.

or

< 2300 incoming.

spooderman

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 1045

Quote from: jonoiv on November 25, 2014, 05:17:02 PM

Quote from: spooderman on November 25, 2014, 05:09:31 PM

jonoiv you just failed so hard. wow.

> Greater than

< Less than

Problem?

Yes, someone has already explained that he used the correct symbol :S

jonoiv

hero member

Activity: 966

Merit: 526

🐺Dogs for President🐺

Quote from: spooderman on November 25, 2014, 05:09:31 PM

jonoiv you just failed so hard. wow.

> Greater than

< Less than

Problem?

NotLambchop

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 254

Quote from: jonoiv on November 25, 2014, 04:51:36 PM

...

The sign you used is > (greater than)
...

Not the "PANTS!" sign?

ParabellumLite

sr. member

Activity: 560

Merit: 250

Quote from: jonoiv on November 25, 2014, 05:02:40 PM

Quote from: SkyValeey on November 25, 2014, 04:54:18 PM

Buahahahahaa

2300>x means that x will be less than 2300.

Do MATH kid

Back to ignore forever, bye bye blackbird

No it doesn't it means:

2300 > soon
2300 (greater than) in a short amount of time.

What you meant to say was...

< 2300 soon.

What you actually said doesn't make any sense.

I really hope you are shorting, and you learn the hard way. Cheesy

At times like this I wish there was a downvote button.

spooderman

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 1045

jonoiv you just failed so hard. wow.

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 24279. (Read 26707072 times)