Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 24517. (Read 26711240 times)

legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 254
...we just seem to be slipping down further, there's no sign of an upwards reversal.

So...  Dance party?
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035
I fail to see how $370 is not a great price right now

Sure, we were at $360 2 days ago but we've had retracements before we got there and it really looks like we are entering a bull market right now.

Why is nobody buying Huh

In theory this 'should' be a bull market as the price has dropped.

'Dem cheap coinz'

Etc etc but......we just seem to be slipping down further, there's no sign of an upwards reversal.

Yea.. I guess the fact that we have more volume then ever on a, what looks like to be a reversal, is pretty bearish... Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1005


In a steady-state system, the price of a monetary asset is given by the "quantity theory of money", which states that:

P x Q = M x V, where P is the price of the goods - so the price of the monetary asset is its inverse: B = 1 / P

B = 1/P = Q / (M x V)

Q is the amount of goods bought by the monetary asset, M is the amount of monetary asset in circulation, and V is the average velocity (the number of times per year that a given bitcoin is used to buy something).

V is the inverse of T, the (harmonic) average holding time of a bitcoin: the number of years a bitcoin is held as store of value.

So the "end value" in steady state of a bitcoin will ultimately depend on two things:
how much stuff is bought using bitcoin, and how long one holds one's bitcoins.


This theory is too simplified, and has many flaws, thus not used by bitcoin community  Cheesy

1. The formula only works when there is only one currency
If there are multiple currencies in circulation, that will become PQ=m1v1+m2v2+m3v3+... Because bitcoin is only one small currency in circulation, you can not use the formula to calculate its price since you don't know how much goods are exclusively sold for bitcoin (maybe none)

2. Not all the money has the same circulation speed
For a given amount of dollar, the V for each dollar is different, impossible to use this model to calculate anything. For example, FED has created 6x more money since 2008, but majority of those money has a velocity of 0 (hold at FED as reserve), thus removed from circulation

3. The P in the formula usually don't include capital goods (for example MBS or bitcoin), which consists of majority of today's money flow. When capital goods enter the formula, the calculation will be totally changed and the price level of daily goods will become irrelevant

For bitcoin, there is one simple method to calculate its value: The mining cost. Mining cost is the lowest possible cost to get bitcoin, it is the baseline for its valuation


Which is also wrong, the mining cost follows the value. Lower price, lower mining cost, on the long time scale.

sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 254
Is bitcoin the mark of the beast? The permabulls make me think it's possible: anyone who does not worship the beast or its image would be killed. Roll Eyes
Also: causes all people to receive the mark of the beast in their right hand or in their forehead. Shocked
...

Confirmed a long time ago.

legendary
Activity: 3556
Merit: 9709
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
I fail to see how $370 is not a great price right now

Sure, we were at $360 2 days ago but we've had retracements before we got there and it really looks like we are entering a bull market right now.

Why is nobody buying Huh

In theory this 'should' be a bull market as the price has dropped.

'Dem cheap coinz'

Etc etc but......we just seem to be slipping down further, there's no sign of an upwards reversal.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
World Class Cryptonaire
I fail to see how $370 is not a great price right now

Sure, we were at $360 2 days ago but we've had retracements before we got there and it really looks like we are entering a bull market right now.

Why is nobody buying Huh

Funny that you say that, my weekly auto-buy just occurred.
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035
I fail to see how $370 is not a great price right now

Sure, we were at $360 2 days ago but we've had retracements before we got there and it really looks like we are entering a bull market right now.

Why is nobody buying Huh
legendary
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1012
Beyond Imagination


In a steady-state system, the price of a monetary asset is given by the "quantity theory of money", which states that:

P x Q = M x V, where P is the price of the goods - so the price of the monetary asset is its inverse: B = 1 / P

B = 1/P = Q / (M x V)

Q is the amount of goods bought by the monetary asset, M is the amount of monetary asset in circulation, and V is the average velocity (the number of times per year that a given bitcoin is used to buy something).

V is the inverse of T, the (harmonic) average holding time of a bitcoin: the number of years a bitcoin is held as store of value.

So the "end value" in steady state of a bitcoin will ultimately depend on two things:
how much stuff is bought using bitcoin, and how long one holds one's bitcoins.


This theory is too simplified, and has many flaws, thus not used by bitcoin community  Cheesy

1. The formula only works when there is only one currency
If there are multiple currencies in circulation, that will become PQ=m1v1+m2v2+m3v3+... Because bitcoin is only one small currency in circulation, you can not use the formula to calculate its price since you don't know how much goods are exclusively sold for bitcoin (maybe none)

2. Not all the money has the same circulation speed
For a given amount of dollar, the V for each dollar is different, impossible to use this model to calculate anything. For example, FED has created 6x more money since 2008, but majority of those money has a velocity of 0 (hold at FED as reserve), thus removed from circulation

3. The P in the formula usually don't include capital goods (for example MBS or bitcoin), which consists of majority of today's money flow. When capital goods enter the formula, the calculation will be totally changed and the price level of daily goods will become irrelevant

For bitcoin, there is one simple method to calculate its value: The mining cost. Mining cost is the lowest possible cost to get bitcoin, it is the baseline for its valuation
legendary
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1094
Is bitcoin the mark of the beast? The permabulls make me think it's possible: anyone who does not worship the beast or its image would be killed. Roll Eyes
Also: causes all people to receive the mark of the beast in their right hand or in their forehead. Shocked

http://arstechnica.com/business/2014/11/man-has-nfc-chips-injected-into-his-hands-to-store-cold-bitcoin-wallet/
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035
Kinda looks like we'll be going further down right?

Can you imagine $330 again? That would be sick..
N12
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1010
...snip...

Blitz, you realise the Shroomskit account is used by (and this is an IIRC from a Shroomskit post months back) four different people (shared house? company) -- which explains the lack of consistency and distinct personality changes in posts every few days/hours.  And none of them give a fuck about what the others post.

So, keep posting this is a bit like posting Parashat ha-Shavua to prove the Pope is Catholic. Save your time/bandwidth.

He's lying to hide his shame. Just have a look at his writing styles/personas and you'll see they're consistent.
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035
Looks like a mini bubble of december 2013 imo

Yea, Nov 9th to Nov 15 looks like a Alt coin pump and dump.   Shocked

So what does one make of this??
legendary
Activity: 1159
Merit: 1001
Looks like a mini bubble of december 2013 imo

Yea, Nov 9th to Nov 15 looks like a Alt coin pump and dump.   Shocked

legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035
Looks like a mini bubble of december 2013 imo
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
Bitcoin = pump and dump scam coin   Huh Huh Huh Huh
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1005
In a steady-state system, the price of a monetary asset is given by the "quantity theory of money", which states that:

P x Q = M x V, where

P is the price of the goods, Q is the amount of goods bought by the monetary asset, M is the amount of monetary asset in circulation, and V is the average velocity (the number of times per year that a given bitcoin is used to buy something).
Dump the velocity. and you are good to go. It has to be liquid, the owner needs to know that he can easily get rid of the bitcoins, actual trades are not needed.

You cannot ignore the velocity.  If everybody would pay their bills the same day they get the money, instead of waiting to the end of the month, the same amount of trading would require 1/30 as much currency in circulation.  If the currency it bitcoin, the smaller demand would imply a lower value per BTC.
[...]

If you have money, change your mind to having a car instead; someone else having a car, but prefers holding money, then the two switched roles, and no change in demand for money or cars happened. So it depends on the seller, does he have the same wish to hold money as the buyer before he decided to buy?

One has to use consistent quantities Q, V, M and P of course.

So in your example, if you include the car in Q, then you have to include the money transfer in V.   Of course, if two people exchange something, you might think that that doesn't influence anything.  That would be correct if they were going to exchange, no matter what happens.  If I'm going to exchange my car with my father, who gives me money he has under his matrass instead, then this might not influence the price of cars on the car market.
However, that is not the case in general.
I will make a decision to buy a car, or to buy something else, or to hold my money, based upon several criteria, like the price of the car, my projections of getting money in the future and so on.  And it are these decisions which determine demand and offer, and settle prices.  If I think I will get money next month, I might consider buying a car.   If I think I will not get much money next month, I might reconsider buying that car.  The person supposed to give me some money next month (my employer) will have to get that money from somewhere.  Maybe by selling goods.  The price he will get from his goods will depend on how much money people are willing to give.  And so on.

So, exchanges, or better, the arbitration between different possible exchanges (or not), determine offer and demand, and hence price.  So they are not "neutral to price" except if there is no choice and they are going to happen no matter what.


It is neutral, in my case when everything that happened was a change of roles. If the seller turns around and uses his money, and also everyone down the road, then there will be a cascade of exchanges. If down the road, some seller should just keep the money, the situation is restored.

In the end it means that it is the aggregate demand to hold money (and the aggregate demand to hold anything else, which is just the inverse, or the supply of money), that decides what the money is worth. Not the transactions.

The velocity does not include financial transactions. Money is never produced or never consumed (sound money, that is), so the velocity is a number that tries to express the trade in the production chain. That is, it is fundamenentally expressing the same as GDP. It is never measured, it is computed. It is basically useless for thinking about the value of bitcoin.

hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Will my order at 367 get filled?

Nope


most likely. It's only Saturday evening GMT. The 'weekend dip' factor has only just started

15 min MACD will cause a reversal in 9 mins.  

and anyone that thinks the 15 min MACD is worthless, think again  Cool

I consider the 4h MACD risky in case you want to go against the 1d MACD and/or it's not steep enough. And I like to take a quick look at the 4h StochRSI as well as a secondary source of judgment (and 1d RSI as a tertiary).
I think 15m MACD is more like noise. The sampling range is too narrow to filter the random noise by averaging. It doesn't tell anything more than taking a quick look at the raw data points to form an opinion for yourself.
hero member
Activity: 722
Merit: 500
Will my order at 367 get filled?

Nope


most likely. It's only Saturday evening GMT. The 'weekend dip' factor has only just started

15 min MACD will cause a reversal in 9 mins. 

and anyone that thinks the 15 min MACD is worthless, think again  Cool

That worked well! lol
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
Dear controllers of bitcoin price:

Please wait until next year to start the next bubble. I graduate from college next month and start my new job Jan 28th. I would like to buy at least 10K USD worth before you make it more expensive.

Thanks,
Hyphymikey

PS. If you have to have a bubble before then, at least bring the price back down to pre-bubble levels (which has never happened before, I know)
Jump to: