Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 24707. (Read 26713578 times)

legendary
Activity: 3962
Merit: 11519
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
WOW





VERY MARKETCAP!!



Finally, it was about time. Those goddamn manipulators couldn´t hold it down any longer!   Angry

Fair price for a fair coin!

Wow, it seems like i´m a USD billionaire right now!  Shocked

Dont sell your Doge for $400. Its a beartrap. Wait for $10,000.

That chart appears to be from last December 2013 or January 2014... there was some kind of glitch in the charts, and that was the first time that I had heard about Doge coin...
member
Activity: 343
Merit: 11
Rangers.Protocol
Hoarding is simply the same as saving. Savings are what makes capitalism a viable economic model. Inflation is a stealth tax from those who have last use of new money (the poor, middle class) to the pockets of those who have first use of new money (the banks, wealthy, government).

It is not quite so simple. Standard economists worry that if inflation becomes too low (or if there is deflation), incentive to hoard increases and incentive to invest drops, which could lead to negative growth, the bête noire of capitalism.



Agree... On the other hand, negative growth is in fact what we desperately need to reduce the consumption of resources and reduce of polution and waste on planet earth.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1538
yes
Hoarding is simply the same as saving. Savings are what makes capitalism a viable economic model. Inflation is a stealth tax from those who have last use of new money (the poor, middle class) to the pockets of those who have first use of new money (the banks, wealthy, government).

It is not quite so simple. Standard economists worry that if inflation becomes too low (or if there is deflation), incentive to hoard increases and incentive to invest drops, which could lead to negative growth, the bête noire of capitalism.



The situation you refer to is only possible in a domain where there is an artificially enforced monopoly on the money supply, e.g. central bank, totalitarian capital controls, etc.

Free markets rapidly fill shortages of goods, monetary or otherwise, and correct mispricing.

Can't let that happen, can we?
legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
Hoarding is simply the same as saving. Savings are what makes capitalism a viable economic model. Inflation is a stealth tax from those who have last use of new money (the poor, middle class) to the pockets of those who have first use of new money (the banks, wealthy, government).

It is not quite so simple. Standard economists worry that if inflation becomes too low (or if there is deflation), incentive to hoard increases and incentive to invest drops, which could lead to negative growth, the bête noire of capitalism.



The situation you refer to is only possible in a domain where there is an artificially enforced monopoly on the money supply, e.g. central bank, totalitarian capital controls, etc.

Free markets rapidly fill shortages of goods, monetary or otherwise, and correct mispricing.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
It is not quite so simple. Standard economists worry that if inflation becomes too low (or if there is deflation), incentive to hoard increases and incentive to invest drops, which could lead to negative growth, the bête noire of capitalism.

There is inflation because there is money. The purpose of money primarily is to facilitate trade. That is not to say trade cannot happen without money. Money just makes trading easier.

From that perspective, there is no reason for inflation at all. This is because money is just an intermediary for the exchange of goods.

Now, on the argument that deflation leads to negative growth, that is true to a certain extent but mostly because the basis of growth is consumption, to the extent of excessiveness, regardless of factors like environmental degradation which may lead to our eventual extinction because of climate change for example.

Capitalism when driven by greed will lead to our eventual demise because there is no limit to greed. The only way out is to realise this before it is too late.
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1006
100 satoshis -> ISO code
Hoarding is simply the same as saving. Savings are what makes capitalism a viable economic model. Inflation is a stealth tax from those who have last use of new money (the poor, middle class) to the pockets of those who have first use of new money (the banks, wealthy, government).

It is not quite so simple. Standard economists worry that if inflation becomes too low (or if there is deflation), incentive to hoard increases and incentive to invest drops, which could lead to negative growth, the bête noire of capitalism.

There is merit to the argument that inflation should match real GDP, rather than remain near zero, with deflationary effects. Even gold "inflates" as the stockpile grows from mining. Bitcoin will inflate at a greater rate than the world real GDP growth rate for some years yet. And if Bitcoin deflationary effects ever proved a constraint on GDP in a Bitcoin economy, then there is always Litecoin etc to take up the slack.

Also, those standard economists may well be in "academic capture" and parrot the view that serves their employers (central banks, government) best.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/05/18/regulatory-and-academic-capture/
full member
Activity: 660
Merit: 101
Colletrix - Bridging the Physical and Virtual Worl
Hoarding is simply the same as saving. Savings are what makes capitalism a viable economic model. Inflation is a stealth tax from those who have last use of new money (the poor, middle class) to the pockets of those who have first use of new money (the banks, wealthy, government).

It is not quite so simple. Standard economists worry that if inflation becomes too low (or if there is deflation), incentive to hoard increases and incentive to invest drops, which could lead to negative growth, the bête noire of capitalism.

legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
Well he is definitely trolling now, of course, I'm just wondering if he's always trolling or just trying his hand at it for a bit.

Think of it like the journey of Anakin Skywalker, way back, starting off with an open mind, but soon began an ever deeper descent into the troll-side of the farce.

 Cheesy ...
in that one the farce is strong,
mastered the dark arts of the subtle FUD has he.
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1006
100 satoshis -> ISO code
Well he is definitely trolling now, of course, I'm just wondering if he's always trolling or just trying his hand at it for a bit.

Think of it like the journey of Anakin Skywalker, way back, starting off with an open mind, but soon began an ever deeper descent into the troll-side of the farce.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
price is moving   Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
I am beginning to wonder if I was wrong about Jorge not being a troll...

I've been calling him a troll for some time

If you started 350 days ago I really can't be arsed to calculate it, but either way you're clearly full of shit even if you only started with 0.01 btc or a few satoshis.

Which obviously means he has 0BTC.  Pretty easy to double 0BTC everyday now ain't it.  Kiss

Yeah, but is it possible to sell 0 btc to buy 0 xrp?

Pretty sure that just makes him full of shit, if he's claiming to have something and double it daily but really has zero, it's not clever semantics, it's bullshit.



Well he is definitely trolling now, of course, I'm just wondering if he's always trolling or just trying his hand at it for a bit.
sr. member
Activity: 980
Merit: 256
Decentralized Ascending Auctions on Blockchain
I am beginning to wonder if I was wrong about Jorge not being a troll...

I've been calling him a troll for some time

If you started 350 days ago I really can't be arsed to calculate it, but either way you're clearly full of shit even if you only started with 0.01 btc or a few satoshis.

Which obviously means he has 0BTC.  Pretty easy to double 0BTC everyday now ain't it.  Kiss

Yeah, but is it possible to sell 0 btc to buy 0 xrp?

Pretty sure that just makes him full of shit, if he's claiming to have something and double it daily but really has zero, it's not clever semantics, it's bullshit.

legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
If you started 350 days ago I really can't be arsed to calculate it, but either way you're clearly full of shit even if you only started with 0.01 btc or a few satoshis.

Which obviously means he has 0BTC.  Pretty easy to double 0BTC everyday now ain't it.  Kiss
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
I am beginning to wonder if I was wrong about Jorge not being a troll...
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1013
Jorge and ripple seem like a good match but in the long run they might both be dead.
I see what you did there.
legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
Crap money is ok for crap countries, in fact it almost defines them. All the observational evidence strongly points towards sound money as being a necessary condition for prosperity, especially over long time frames.

Jorge and ripple seem like a good match but in the long run they might both be dead.
sr. member
Activity: 980
Merit: 256
Decentralized Ascending Auctions on Blockchain


for a maths professor jorge isn't very good at maths, lol
Jump to: