Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 24764. (Read 26711963 times)

legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
Dropping like a stone Roll Eyes
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Lots of old coins are moving.

Some graphs/proof please or should we take your word for it.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Lots of old coins are moving.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Since I already lost 2 million dollars, I think I'm going to ride this one out. But don't worry, I should be safe because I only invested about 0.5% of my wealth.

May I ask then, if you are that wealthy, why are you bothering with a cheap-ass referral link in your signature?

So that people can find a reliable solution for securing their bitcoins, with the affiliate link I can monitor the amount of sales that are being done...

Ah right. Is that you, Bruce Wayne?  Cheesy

ssshhhh, don't blow my cover.

I don't want to create another false identity called NotLampChop.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1003
I think a long-term trend is starting to develop.  Any TA pros care to weigh in?

I edited the Wikipedia article on "cup and handle" for style.  Is that "pro" enough?  Grin

The Janyary--April 2013 bubble took the price from ~14$ to ~120$ (steady-state after the oscillations died out), and the November 2013 bubble took it from there to ~800$ (ditto).

It seems pretty certain that the Nov/2013 bubble was due to demand by the "popular" commodity speculation market in Mainland Chinese, opened to bitcoin by Huobi, OKCoin and other Mainland exchanges. That is supported both by articles in the media at the time, and by how the price reacted (and failed to react) to news since Dec/2013.

The Apr/2013 bubble too may be due to China; specifically to BTC-China catering to a different population in Shanghai, a special economic zone in China.

The "mini-bubble" at the end of May/2014, from ~450$ to ~650$, remains unexplained.  However, its rise was sudden and not exponential.  It may have been a few whales (perhaps only one) who got some insider info or original analysis, and "panic bought" a large amount.

From Feb/2014 to May/2014, the price dropped nearly 400$.  Again, that drop was almost certainly due to shrinking of the  Chinese demand in the wake of government decisions.  The overall trend in that period was roughly exponential decay (rouhgly straight in the log-scale chart).  Extrapolating that trend to the present gives ~130$, plus or minus some 30$.

The price is now ~130$ lower than it was at the start of the May mini-bubble. Therefore the drop since Jun/2014 cannot be due solely to that mini-bubble deflating.  On the other hand, the difference between the price extrapolated from Feb--May (~130$) and the current price (~330$) is 200$, the same as the mini-bubble rise from May to June.

There is no sign that large stashes of OLD coins are being sold.  Presumably, those who bought at 10$ or less are not in a hurry to sell, and may choose to hold for another few months in case there is another mega-bubble.  Those who bought in November or later must be feeling very bad and presumably are more likely to sell in order to cut their looses losses.

Therefore, my theory is that the decline since Jun/2014 was due mainly to the Chinese pulling out, according to the same exponential decay trend from Feb to May; while those buyers who caused the May mini-bubble are still holding.

If this theory is correct, then the price should gradually drop to the price before the November bubble (~120$) plus the increase of the May mini-bubble (~200$); that is, only a bit lower than now.  

If the April 2013 bubble too is deflating, but the May mini-bubble is not, then the price should continue to drop gradually to about 14$ + 200$, that is, about 215$.

If the May mini-bubble is deflating too, but the April one is not, the bottom should be ~120$.

If all three bubbles are deflating, the bottom should be in the low double digits.

The markets that were responsible for the pre-2013 bubbles may have continued to grow.  However, the price during their steady-state phases (such as Mar--May 2012) was quite flat, suggesting that the market growth was small or zero.  Also, there is no evidence that use of BTC for e-payment has increased since January, and the attractiveness of BTC as an investment cannot be growing (net sales of SMBIT shares, for example, have been nearly zero for several months.) .  Moreover, the influx of the newly mined coins would cancel some or all of that "vegetative" growth in older markets.


full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
playing pasta and eating mandolinos
Since I already lost 2 million dollars, I think I'm going to ride this one out. But don't worry, I should be safe because I only invested about 0.5% of my wealth.

May I ask then, if you are that wealthy, why are you bothering with a cheap-ass referral link in your signature?

So that people can find a reliable solution for securing their bitcoins, with the affiliate link I can monitor the amount of sales that are being done...

Ah right. Is that you, Bruce Wayne?  Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Since I already lost 2 million dollars, I think I'm going to ride this one out. But don't worry, I should be safe because I only invested about 0.5% of my wealth.

May I ask then, if you are that wealthy, why are you bothering with a cheap-ass referral link in your signature?

So that people can find a reliable solution for securing their bitcoins, with the affiliate link I can monitor the amount of sales that are being done...
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1005


Is it OK to sell a bitcoin below the current already low price to somebody. Or, do you supply letters of indulgance?
hero member
Activity: 748
Merit: 500
If the price continues to go down on a straight line like 6 month now, Bitcoin has become predictable as fuck.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
playing pasta and eating mandolinos
Since I already lost 2 million dollars, I think I'm going to ride this one out. But don't worry, I should be safe because I only invested about 0.5% of my wealth.

May I ask then, if you are that wealthy, why are you bothering with a cheap-ass referral link in your signature?
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
200-250$ by monday?
...

But you don't trade?

...
>trades on exchanges       No I do not

z ≠ s

Fonsie is just a copycat troll.

Says the ubertroll himself

Cut your loose fonsie! It looks pretty bad. Even if you tried to steal my identity(and are a lameass troll), i don´t want you to get broke due to the upcoming ubercrash.

Since I already lost 2 million dollars, I think I'm going to ride this one out. But don't worry, I should be safe because I only invested about 0.5% of my wealth.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 254
Can we crash through $266 and get this over with? This as boring as watching a leaf fall from a tree. And I want "dem cheap coinz"

You'll prob'ly blow them on AM anyhow, but I'll see what I can do.
Hang tight.
P.S:  Maybe Ken will send you a few cheap coins Undecided
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
Can we crash through $266 and get this over with? This as boring as watching a leaf fall from a tree. And I want "dem cheap coinz"

Slow bleeds only. Sorry
sr. member
Activity: 316
Merit: 250
Can we crash through $266 and get this over with? This as boring as watching a leaf fall from a tree. And I want "dem cheap coinz"
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
Moderator
200-250$ by monday?
...

But you don't trade?

...
>trades on exchanges       No I do not

z ≠ s

Fonsie is just a copycat troll.

Says the ubertroll himself

Cut your loose fonsie! It looks pretty bad. Even if you tried to steal my identity(and are a lameass troll), i don´t want you to get broke due to the upcoming ubercrash.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 254
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
Moderator
Jump to: