Explanation
Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 24950. (Read 26711605 times)
October 21, 2014, 10:00:44 PM
October 21, 2014, 09:42:05 PM
Canada listened to Andreas and made me almost believe in elected representation.
NY didn't.
Except those guys were not elected... Appointed lifetime trough swillers.NY didn't.
October 21, 2014, 09:40:27 PM
Canada listened to Andreas and made me almost believe in elected representation.
NY didn't.
Except those guys were not elected... Appointed lifetime trough swillers.NY didn't.
October 21, 2014, 09:36:04 PM
Canada listened to Andreas and made me almost believe in elected representation.
NY didn't.
NY didn't.
Except those guys were not elected...
Appointed lifetime trough swillers.
face it canadians are just cooler poeple.
Except that Canada has no 2nd amendment protections. No legal firearms to defend against tyranny and criminals, only guns for the criminals
Better stated this way
October 21, 2014, 09:35:45 PM
Canada listened to Andreas and made me almost believe in elected representation.
NY didn't.
NY didn't.
Except those guys were not elected...
Appointed lifetime trough swillers.
face it canadians are just cooler poeple.
Except that Canada has no 2nd amendment protections. No legal firearms to defend against tyranny and criminals, only guns for the criminals and govt.
That's NOT a bad thing. 2nd amendment is overrated, anyhow.
October 21, 2014, 09:32:06 PM
Quote
We simulate the trading strategy described
above on a third of total data in the duration of May
6, 2014 to June 24, 2014 in a causal manner to see how
well our strategy does.
above on a third of total data in the duration of May
6, 2014 to June 24, 2014 in a causal manner to see how
well our strategy does.
What a remarkable coincidence to have picked a range of dates where even random trades would've likely been profitable.
October 21, 2014, 09:31:30 PM
The degree of uncertainty in future price predictions is too high to make either judgement. A second-order model treats epistemic uncertainty as an overlay to stochastic uncertainty, but there is no generally recognized quantitive analytic methodology for valuation under conditions of epistemic uncertainty. It would be a wonderful topic for a Ph.D. thesis in behavioural economics.
Everyone knows that dragons don’t exist. But while this simplistic formulation may satisfy the layman, it does not suffice for the scientific mind. The School of Higher Neantical Nillity is in fact wholly unconcerned with what does exist. Indeed, the banality of existence has been so amply demonstrated, there is no need for us to discuss it any further here. The brilliant Cerebron, attacking the problem analytically, discovered three distinct kinds of dragon: the mythical, the chimerical, and the purely hypothetical. They were all, one might say, nonexistent, but each nonexisted in an entirely different way. (c) 
October 21, 2014, 09:30:33 PM
Canada listened to Andreas and made me almost believe in elected representation.
NY didn't.
NY didn't.
Except those guys were not elected...
Appointed lifetime trough swillers.
face it canadians are just cooler poeple.
Except that Canada has no 2nd amendment protections. No legal firearms to defend against tyranny and criminals, only guns for the criminals and govt.
October 21, 2014, 09:19:32 PM
lol we arent going anywhere price is rock solid
later mofos
later mofos
October 21, 2014, 09:17:48 PM
October 21, 2014, 09:13:38 PM
Stamp seems quite solid at 382$ at the moment. Maybe we are now laying on the bottom for awhile and then head up? Most of the indicators look quite hopeful, macds lining up quite nicely in all timescales and so on.
pretty sure we are setting up to break 390 again, maybe for good this time. things look good, feels like only a matter of time till we see some violent movement and in the right direction i plan to sell at 460-480, and cover that short at 420ish
[img]
The market has been way too boring in the last few days indeed. The volume is drying up and every charts including the magic indicators are getting really close to flat / neutral.
So, I agree it must break out into one direction or the other soon. However, I am far from certain of that direction. It should go up for several reasons but that means it probably won't.
its really hard to say.
if everything thinks price has to go one way or the other and SOON, then i'm starting to think it wont move for a while longer
October 21, 2014, 09:09:08 PM
we all know that using bitcoin for illicit activity will not be stopped in NY because of this BitLicense, they will simply ignore it and continue using TOR... it will however hinder legitimate use and innovation in NY
Benjamin Lawsky, you fucked up man... big time.
Benjamin Lawsky, you fucked up man... big time.
Benjamin Lawsky team is doxxing ninja dice sites now! Ask Eric Voorhees & dooglus lmfao
virtually anonymous October 21, 2014, 09:07:49 PM
Stamp seems quite solid at 382$ at the moment. Maybe we are now laying on the bottom for awhile and then head up? Most of the indicators look quite hopeful, macds lining up quite nicely in all timescales and so on.
pretty sure we are setting up to break 390 again, maybe for good this time. things look good, feels like only a matter of time till we see some violent movement and in the right direction i plan to sell at 460-480, and cover that short at 420ish
Are you serious? Trading seems to just serve as a means to lose your bitcoins. Surely, you could practice with 10% of the stash or some other fractional amount, but trading does NOT seem to be a good idea... at least in my thinking and at least NOT in these price ranges..
October 21, 2014, 09:05:01 PM
Stamp seems quite solid at 382$ at the moment. Maybe we are now laying on the bottom for awhile and then head up? Most of the indicators look quite hopeful, macds lining up quite nicely in all timescales and so on.
pretty sure we are setting up to break 390 again, maybe for good this time. things look good, feels like only a matter of time till we see some violent movement and in the right direction i plan to sell at 460-480, and cover that short at 420ish
[img]
The market has been way too boring in the last few days indeed. The volume is drying up and every charts including the magic indicators are getting really close to flat / neutral.
So, I agree it must break out into one direction or the other soon. However, I am far from certain of that direction. It should go up for several reasons but that means it probably won't.
October 21, 2014, 09:00:46 PM
October 21, 2014, 09:00:39 PM
Stamp seems quite solid at 382$ at the moment. Maybe we are now laying on the bottom for awhile and then head up? Most of the indicators look quite hopeful, macds lining up quite nicely in all timescales and so on.
your statement makes little to NO sense... Prices are NOT solid, they are fluctuating on a daily basis. They may be within a certain range for a period of time,but $382 does NOT seem to be any particular resting point, even though prices have been passing through that point several times in the past month.
October 21, 2014, 08:52:44 PM
I want to see 500s again. It's been so long 
October 21, 2014, 08:33:11 PM
Stamp seems quite solid at 382$ at the moment. Maybe we are now laying on the bottom for awhile and then head up? Most of the indicators look quite hopeful, macds lining up quite nicely in all timescales and so on.
pretty sure we are setting up to break 390 again, maybe for good this time. things look good, feels like only a matter of time till we see some violent movement and in the right direction i plan to sell at 460-480, and cover that short at 420ish
October 21, 2014, 08:27:06 PM
Canada listened to Andreas and made me almost believe in elected representation.
NY didn't.
NY didn't.
Except those guys were not elected...
Appointed lifetime trough swillers.
face it canadians are just cooler poeple.
Lol it was nice to see that they chose to do nothing, but hardly surprising, as that is the MO of the Senate
October 21, 2014, 08:25:46 PM
Jorge, the following might be of interest to you:
https://newsoffice.mit.edu/2014/mit-computer-scientists-can-predict-price-bitcoin
http://venturebeat.com/2014/10/21/want-to-know-when-to-sell-bitcoins-mit-researchers-can-predict-prices/
https://newsoffice.mit.edu/2014/mit-computer-scientists-can-predict-price-bitcoin
http://venturebeat.com/2014/10/21/want-to-know-when-to-sell-bitcoins-mit-researchers-can-predict-prices/
If everyone use the same indicators to buy or sell, then the prices will rise or fall when we see the indicators.
It is kind of circular
Reminds me of backtesting strategies on cryptotrader. This is nothing new, just MIT kids writing trading algorithms. But they don't take into account slippage, trading fees and order size. If it worked as well as they say it does, they'd be more profitable using it themselves.
Jump to: