Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 25010. (Read 26710560 times)

What if tomorrow there are <10k BTC in asks because the criminals and anarchists all withdrew?

The panic buys may have already occurred. If that's the case and we can expect less new fiat entering Stamp, then...

Who of you guys didn't get properly verified?  

There's the idealistic part of me in Bitcoin: to stick it to the man!

And then there's the part that likes to keep his money, and keep counterparty risk down. So, I for one welcome Bitstamp's anal probing rigid KYC procedure. Makes it less likely the place will go tits up from a legal crackdown, imo.

You know you could have just said "well name names" and gotten about the same amount of information across as your enormous wall of text. You're the one making the assumption that your thing applies, so before you can apply it, why don't you explain how it does? Because you can't, because it doesn't.

Calling me a bunch of names while saying the same stupid shit over and over again doesn't make a good argument.

What if the 30k bearwhale wasn't even verified? What's he going to do with all this useless Bitstamp IOU fiat?

better tell my friend.

Indeed! Time to buy and withdraw!

this is bulish as fuck!

+1  

Prepare yourself to: CUT YOUR GOOSES and YOUR MOOSES and YOUR CABOOSES LOOSES!!!!!!!!!!!!   Buy, Buy, BUY!!!!

(lets see if the this post gets deleted?)

http://www.coindesk.com/bitstamp-unverified-accounts-risk-government-seizure-28-days/

 

More reasons to not send fiat to Stamp...

Perfect excuse for obfuscating, is white knighting...   You are getting to be more and more ridiculous....



Yes, divert... You are the one that made the initial assertion, so why don't you back it up rather than pointing the finger at me?



I was NOT making any assertion, you were.  So go ahead and back it up, rather than attempting to get me to back up a supposed assertion that I never made.




O.k. There you go again, assuming that beartrolls and bulltrolls are equivalent, yet you provide no names or examples of bull trolls.  You are engaging in a distracting strawman type argument to assert the supposed existence of a problem, without any proof beyond your mere assertion, and then you propose some kind of fair solution.

This whole conversation seems to be a distraction and without any there, there.



I'm NOT arguing anything, I am just asking you to back up your meaningless, groundless and conclusory claims.



What name did I call you and when was this?  I asserted that your various arguments are meaningless, ridiculess, baseless, diversionary, logically fallacious, etc etc... and I continuously asked for you to support them. That is NOT calling names, but just putting your arguments into various categories and attempting to get some kind of meaningful response, but to date you have failed and/or refused to provide any kind of meaningful and substantive response for your various assertions that bulltrolls are the same as beartrolls or and that they supposedly equally exist in this thread and whatever other preposterous assertions you seem to be making.

watch the fuck out, CrAzY poeple make this market move!

yesterday was so good, then all hell broke lose today, i best be buyin.....

That's it! Shroomsy is the whale dumper. Everything he writes is with an evil grin on his face. It all makes sense now.

They are the cause of mine.

Better yet, ignore. He's just a dumb kid who has no interest in learning. Not going to waste my time.

Poke them both with your sharpest jibes and see if they have anything new to say.

bitcoin's ups and downs are wilder than my ups and downs, and thats saying something!

Shroomie is probably riding the Crimson tide right now... Don't pay any attention.

Explanation

No one's posts are getting deleted for what could be perceived to be trolling (at least as far as I can tell), which is exactly the way I like it.