Honestly, I find JorgeStolfi's long-winded post more interesting than yours. At least he's talking about bitcoin on a thread which is about bitcoin..
When you are referring to "the poster," you are referring to me.
This is the speculation forum, so I suppose it remains fair to speculate; however, your evidence regarding the extent to which I could have a mental disorder seems to be sparse, at best. In other words, you seem to be engaged in gratuitous name-calling without any evidence and very little substantive discussion of anything of any relevance.
Regarding Jorge as compared with me: I have NO problem with you finding him relatively more interesting than me. That is your personal choice. Also, it does NOT seem to serve any purpose to discuss your personal preferences, so a bit difficult to understand what point you are attempting to get at, here.
It's not my fault if you feel like you're one of those people which could possibly have some mental disorder...
The discussion is not about my personal preferences... It's about the content of his post compared to yours and the thread where you are posting. I guess you really does have some problems understanding things.
And aren't we talking about the "bulltard" thingy and about the "name calling"
Until I remember one of your post that condone such behavior.
Yes.. "Bulltard" seemed insulting but not "cuntface" or "loser".. LOL!
Of course I remember it.. It's only you who keeps mentioning about unnecessary things. So, what does "attempts to justify your supposed important claims about BTC price movements" has to do with name-calling? And if you actually checked that post, you'd see that I merely posted the current price of btc at that time when the bulltards started posting insulting language. You also mentioned that "the higher the level of derrogatory-ness may cause more attention", how come I didn't see you trying to approach them and lecture them about their improper behavior? I don't think you were not able to read their posts since it's just a few words.
I doubt you approached me to discuss about name-calling in this thread and because you dislike such behavior in this thread because this posts: (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7298719)
clearly shows that you aren't concerned about that.
It seems like you were locked up in the basement with nothing but your laptop and desperately seeking for attention in the interwebs
I'm outta here
Oh.. and one more thing that is probably a psychological problem for you is that you seem to be viewing your interactions here on the interwebs as some kind of competition, including these recent posts with me. There may be some posters who are competing, but I am NOT one of them.. So step back from the keyboard, sir, ma'am or bot!!!!!!
Heh I posted that when I got bored waiting for a reply I can't believe you'd even say something about that... I guess that is probably a psychological problem for you... LOL!
You step away from the keyboard bulltard...
I guess it's probably some sort of a psychological problem.. You'd always find a reason to slap your long-winded post.
I wouldn't be surprised if we later end up with you lecturing me about my grammatical errors.
You wouldn't be surprised if I were to attempt to correct your grammar because again you are engaging in what seems to be pure speculation that has little to no basis in reality. I hope that your attempts to forecast the price direction of BTC are better than your whimsical attempts to analyze and predict the personalities and behaviors of pseudo-anonymous persons on the internet?
Well based on how you react with a single image and a three letter sentence, and how it ended up with something like "psychological problem", "competition", "bot", "emotion", etc. , there's a posibillity that we end up with that since you already mentioned about my sentences not comprehensible
There seems to be quite a bit stream of consciousness going on here, and loose connections, and seems like you are getting a bit worked up over this, at least to the extent that your sentences are NOT really comprehensible in a self-contained manner, but hinge on a form of fill-in-the-blank puzzle.
This might need a new thread judging only by its length.
There's no way I'm gonna attempt reading all that.