You are sounding a bit delusional, paranoid and self-absorbed in your attempts to justify your supposed important claims about BTC price movements.
Nope. If I am, I would have posted long winded post explaining it like what you do
Length of post is a discretionary and judgement matter, in which each of comes a varying conclusions regarding how much we need to say or how much we feel we need to explain and/or what kinds of words to use.. or the tone, etc. There could be some examples of long-winded, but really I do NOT know about what you speak. You may conclude that my post is "long-winded" because you do NOT understand the significance of the language that is being used or maybe you do NOT agree with the contents, so instead of responding to the substance, you conclude that what was said was, "long-winded."
...Or maybe the poster just have some sort of a mental disorder.
Honestly, I find JorgeStolfi's long-winded post more interesting than yours. At least he's talking about bitcoin on a thread which is about bitcoin..
And aren't we talking about the "bulltard" thingy and about the "name calling"
I believe that was the main topic that we started with was my comment that it seemed inflammatory to be throwing out the term bulltard, when there may be better ways to express some of your ideas, to the extent that you may have substantive ideas, which I am beginning to have my doubts.
Yup. You were lecturing me how bad name-calling is and how you dislike such behavior...
Until I remember one of your post that condone such behavior.
Yes.. "Bulltard" seemed insulting but not "cuntface" or "loser"..
LOL!
I barely remember the June 2014 dialogue to which you referred, until you now cited it.
It is possible ChrisML was on to something when he referred to you as cuntface.. and it appears that I was laughing at the seemingly clever comment JimboToronto regarding the inappropriate degrading of a woman's genitals..... I cannot even recall if I agreed substantively with him about to whom the content was directed.. ... I suppose it is possible that I did... . but in the context of any of my comments today, I forgot about all of that until you just reminding me of such... so that previous comment did NOT affect my earlier comment today... but it does seem to establish that you have some preoccupations with pettiness... and potentially taking matters too personally... and that may explain your tendency to call names rather than to engage on a more meaningful level.... possibly mom's basement is getting a little too claustrophobic for you?
Deny all you want.. heh! Birds of the same feather flocks together they say..
I called someone bulltard, he came out like a hero protecting his fellow bulltard... Someone called me cuntface and loser for posting bitcoin's price, he joins the bulltards.. haha and he pretends he dislike name-calling in this thread..
There seems to be quite a bit stream of consciousness going on here, and loose connections, and seems like you are getting a bit worked up over this, at least to the extent that your sentences are NOT really comprehensible in a self-contained manner, but hinge on a form of fill-in-the-blank puzzle.
I don't think I need to explain this further.. Let's not forget this one so people would see it clearly:
I suppose name calling is all a matter of degree, and it is almost as bad to call someone a bull as it is to call them a bulltard, but of course the term bulltard is more derogatory... that should be obvious.. .. and the higher the level of derrogatory-ness may cause more attention.. and of course, each of us may NOT closely read every post.. especially if the post is NOT initially directed towards us....
A similar problem in my thinking would be to call someone a bear or a beartard, both are bad, but calling someone a beartard would be more derogatory..which also should seem obvious... and unnecessary.. no? except maybe rare circumstances...
I would think that it would be better to criticize someone's view by describing their actions or the subject of their posts or to suggest that they cannot see the facts correctly because they are scewed by bearish or bullish preconceptions..
Anyhow, frequently, in my humble bumble opinion, there are better ways to criticize poster for their ideas or the scewed nature of their ideas rather than to getting into name calling. or categorizing people... sometimes I may refer to some poster as a bot.. which I suppose is a bit derrogatory, but many times it is said in jest... I suppose a poster could be a bot-tard, and maybe that could be funny too, if it is NOT over used... or used as a distraction from their ideas... truly there are some ideas that are circulated in this thread that seem to be somewhat devoid of meaning.. and are robotic in nature.. and other ideas are fleshed out more thoroughly...
570s
Hey
cuntface!
Please don't insult women's genitalia by using them to refer to
this loser.
+1
taking matters too personally
That goes back to you.. LOL! I'm not even talking to you when you pop out like a mushroom. Seems like I hurt your feelings when I said "THOSE bulltards"
Possibly mom's basement is getting a little too claustrophobic for you...
just for the sake of it... and even using the lines that I had used on you, directed towards me? At least you could come up with something a little more substantive and/or original.
Says the guy who suddenly pop out of nowhere and started arguing with me. LOL!
-------------------------
I'm outta here
Oh.. and one more thing that is probably a psychological problem for you is that you seem to be viewing your interactions here on the interwebs as some kind of competition, including these recent posts with me. There may be some posters who are competing, but I am NOT one of them.. So step back from the keyboard, sir, ma'am or bot!!!!!!
Heh I posted that when I got bored waiting for a reply
I can't believe you'd even say something about that... I guess that is probably a psychological problem for you... LOL!
You step away from the keyboard bulltard...
Again, you do NOT seem to be saying anything new, here. You are merely taking the lines that I used that were directed towards you, and then directing the lines towards me. Seems like you are running on pure emotion rather than reason. Maybe on the positive shows that you are a human rather than a bot...? And, if you are a bot, you are sure seeming to be an emotional one.. that is lashing out and grasping at straws....
Because there's really nothing to talk about that... LOL! I can't believe you'd even react with my exit phrase/image.. LOL!
I guess it's probably some sort of a psychological problem.. You'd always find a reason to slap your long-winded post.
I wouldn't be surprised if we later end up with you lecturing me about my grammatical errors.
