Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 2595. (Read 26711605 times)
December 22, 2022, 08:15:07 AM
BTC
December 22, 2022, 08:01:17 AM
December 22, 2022, 07:59:26 AM
Merry Christmas to everyone who has held steadfast to their Bitcoins. We keep hodling 
Image source: https://news.bitcoin.com/christmas-bitcoin-memes-crypto-graphics-phneep/
Image source: https://news.bitcoin.com/christmas-bitcoin-memes-crypto-graphics-phneep/
Bitcoin prices are likely to rise appropriately this Christmas Day. Because that's the holding opportunity $16783 bitcoin price. Since 2022, Bitcoin price has fallen by -65.44% as of today, December 22nd. This market will fully recover at one time. Because the Bitcoin market will never stop its price will increase but on this Christmas Day the price of Bitcoin will exceed 20k dollars. But we can never miss this opportunity, now we just have to hold. It is certain that if you hold, the market will recover. But opportunities to invest do not always come the only opportunity is to invest for long term.
December 22, 2022, 07:48:41 AM
Merry Christmas to everyone who has held steadfast to their Bitcoins. We keep hodling
Image source: https://news.bitcoin.com/christmas-bitcoin-memes-crypto-graphics-phneep/
Image source: https://news.bitcoin.com/christmas-bitcoin-memes-crypto-graphics-phneep/
December 22, 2022, 07:19:16 AM
BitcoinBTC is the only gift that keeps giving 🌟
https://twitter.com/TheBitcoinConf/status/1605900293387886595?t=WJGy4ipPdFk6j-_g6egdUA&s=19
https://twitter.com/TheBitcoinConf/status/1605900293387886595?t=WJGy4ipPdFk6j-_g6egdUA&s=19
December 22, 2022, 07:01:21 AM
December 22, 2022, 06:52:51 AM
Hello Wall Observers, glad to be here. 
Great poster that Cryptotourist guy, shame he had to go.
I’ll try my best to walk in his shoes.
You’re funny.
BTW, you wouldn’t happen to be from the country that wants to steal the identity of another neighbouring country would you?
Boy, has he hurt you.
Good thing he didn’t say “baked” or similar, obviously he must have meant “staked” my Homer dude.
+1 WO’s merit.
Remember that - when I drag your spineless ass across the forum.
Is this a joke? What skin?
No we haven’t, we’re only getting started.
Do you always use this many words to claim the obvious?
Hashrate affects the price - not the other way round - period.
If you thought Cryptotourist was such a great guy, just wait till we get acquainted.
First things first, it’s scamdemic without the brackets.
I by no means claim to be expert on anything, but I always - and constantly - do my own research, instead of believing useful idiots such as yourself.
My dog is one of the friendliest dogs alive, apparently like Cryptotourist’s dog too.
BTW, I don’t think he was mean, he just had zero tolerance for bullshit, especially coming from wordy AI’s.
You will retract much more than that Jay, promise.
I speak for myself, and myself only.
My great great great, great great great great, great great great great great, great great great great great great, great great great great great great great grandfather once said:
Great poster that Cryptotourist guy, shame he had to go.
I’ll try my best to walk in his shoes.
Finally, thanks God!
You’re funny.
BTW, you wouldn’t happen to be from the country that wants to steal the identity of another neighbouring country would you?
Boy, has he hurt you.
Wait! What do you mean stacked address?! How big of a stack?! What do we ask about it?? AWww... damn! It's too late; he's gone. We may never know.
Good thing he didn’t say “baked” or similar, obviously he must have meant “staked” my Homer dude.
+1 WO’s merit.
"Let's" not and say that we did.
Remember that - when I drag your spineless ass across the forum.
No skin off my back.
Is this a joke? What skin?
Ok. We've exhausted the topic. I was merely responding to uie-pooie..
No we haven’t, we’re only getting started.
I did not say that, and I am not saying that. The China mining ban is 2021 is an interesting point though in regards to a lot of bitcoin-related matters - but such "ban" did seems to temporarily affect the hashrate in a negative way with a near halvening of the hashrate that largely sprung back within about 4-6 months (and largely sprung back way more quickly than a lot of folks had expected).. .it also seemed to contribute towards already existing miners to have become extremely profitable and inspired a lot of new mining entrance - and perhaps overly leveraging.. and we see some of the fall out from that overleveraging and perhaps even overbuilding today.. ...and it seemed to inspire greater geographical diversity.. .. so yeah of course, BTC price was not unaffected by some of those matters.. but it would likely lead many folks to wrongedly assessments to attempt to hitch whatever various relationships of BTC price to hashrate during that period as if BTC prices were following hashrate.. but hey, believe whatevers you would like.. those are your choices.
Do you always use this many words to claim the obvious?
Hashrate affects the price - not the other way round - period.
Aren't you Mr. Wonderful and such a genius too?
If you thought Cryptotourist was such a great guy, just wait till we get acquainted.
Who cares whether you were right or not about the "scamdemic?" For argument sake, let's assume that you were right about the "scamedemic from day one", as you put it. You are trying to argue that if you happen to be right about one topic, then all of a sudden you are right (or an expert) on all topics. That makes a lot of sense.
First things first, it’s scamdemic without the brackets.
I by no means claim to be expert on anything, but I always - and constantly - do my own research, instead of believing useful idiots such as yourself.
Is your dog friendly? Or mean like you?
My dog is one of the friendliest dogs alive, apparently like Cryptotourist’s dog too.
BTW, I don’t think he was mean, he just had zero tolerance for bullshit, especially coming from wordy AI’s.
I retract all semblance of permission from that earlier statement, if any "permission" had previously existed therein.
You will retract much more than that Jay, promise.
For the sake of which others? Are you now speaking on behalf of readers of the WO?
I speak for myself, and myself only.
Now you are talking.
My great great great, great great great great, great great great great great, great great great great great great, great great great great great great great grandfather once said:
Quote
I’d rather rather fall among crows (korakes), than flatterers (kolakes), for the one devour the dead, but the other the living.
Antisthenes [446-366 BC] 
December 22, 2022, 06:51:04 AM
You must not understand DCA.
DCA in respect to BTC does not give any shits about short term prices - except perhaps retaining a presumption that in the long term 4-10 years or more (or whatever is your holding timeline) bitcoin is likely to have prices that are higher than they are today, so in that sense that it is likely to be a good investment and profitable in the long term.
Buying on the dip is another dynamic that can be used to supplement DCA.. but it is not DCA...
DCA in respect to BTC does not give any shits about short term prices - except perhaps retaining a presumption that in the long term 4-10 years or more (or whatever is your holding timeline) bitcoin is likely to have prices that are higher than they are today, so in that sense that it is likely to be a good investment and profitable in the long term.
Buying on the dip is another dynamic that can be used to supplement DCA.. but it is not DCA...
No no JJG you got me wrong, I understand DCA and you explained this on WO like how many times? 465? Starting in 2014
So by now I think we on WO should know DCA like palm of our hand
Even I personally got some 1-1 JJG DCA Lectures
However since shahzadafzal didn't answer my proposal for a bet yet, I was hesitant to poke the next guy with a bet, as I'm by no means a betting person and I didn't want to come off as one...
That was a bet? I mean that was just a sarcastic smiley.. look..
Regardless of who you support, I think we can all agree (except for the odd alpaca) that BTC should have made a new ATH by the latter. 
First Quarter of 2023I mean I could take it like you meant... it will be ATH even before first quarter of 2023.
Btw since BitcoinBunny mentioned alpaca aka llama, I was poking this singing llama with that comment
December 22, 2022, 06:28:21 AM
Merry Christmas! 🎅🎄BTC
December 22, 2022, 06:01:14 AM
Merry Christmas to all you homos and Bawb.
December 22, 2022, 05:01:17 AM
December 22, 2022, 04:24:28 AM
@OP (Santa poster) and WO gays...sorry, I have no idea what "muscled" Santa manifested, lol.
Perhaps, I can guess, though.
Perhaps, I can guess, though.
Ho-ho-homo! I don't think many WOers are actually gay (apart from Bawb obviously). It's just a good old tradition which is believed to help Bitcoin rise!
December 22, 2022, 04:08:56 AM
Look at the size of his sack. Imagine waking up to that?
December 22, 2022, 04:01:20 AM
December 22, 2022, 03:27:07 AM
To keep with Bob’s tradition of gay Christmas, please accept my gay Christmas cards WO’s.
Merry Xmas to you & yours, hopefully a better 2023 than 2022, hey.
Merry Xmas to you & yours, hopefully a better 2023 than 2022, hey.
December 22, 2022, 03:06:46 AM
By the way Gachapin, you did not notice my earlier attempt in this post to suck you into another BTC price-related bet?
Yes I got that. Thanks for your effort Actually I was more interested in the guy stating we will see 20k+ on Christmas day. (Not bothering to search his comment, sorry)
However since shahzadafzal didn't answer my proposal for a bet yet, I was hesitant to poke the next guy with a bet, as I'm by no means a betting person and I didn't want to come off as one...
however some price predictions seem quite delicious for taking the opposite side of a bet. ...like 20k+ by Christmas or new ATH in 1st quarter of 2023
I feel that I am not really very much of a betting person either.. but members here make it so damned tempting when they are expressing pretty high level events with very high levels of certainty - so it may not even matter which direction in respect that they are making such strong proclamations - it becomes almost a bet that anyone could take - because the odds are against very strong proclamations coming true.
There are some fairly strong proclamations that are either far into the future or within a kind of framework in which it is a bit more difficult to take the other side of the bet.. so maybe the proclamation has to cross a certain threshold before I suggest a bet... and I have actually never had anyone take the other side of any suggested bet that I have made (which is usually in response to what another member states) - so maybe it is me?
I do think it is a decently good exercise to see if we might be able to get members to stand behind their claims when they become so strong - and even feeling kind of outrageous.. which maybe in that sense getting into the details of structuring a bet is not easy, either.
You might be familiar with some of my outrageous BTC price & timeline claims from my December 6, 2021 assignment off probabilities, and I even had something nearing a 0.5% chance that BTC prices could reach more than $1.5 million by mid-2023.. or something like that.. but no one was trying to bet me regarding those kinds of time and price framings... and I believe that you could fairly read my odds of 55% that the $69k top of November 9 was "not in".. and so I guess I was spewing out some kinds of specifics that were ultimately whimpy rather than strong, so no one really asserted that I was being outrageous, and I expected a wee bit more pushback that I did not get.. not that I can remember.
December 22, 2022, 03:01:16 AM
December 22, 2022, 02:48:13 AM
...if I'm not mistaken SBF gets charged in the same Southern District of NY as Jeffrey Epstein...
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/20/technology/sam-bankman-fried-bail.html
let's see if the security cams are working this time
But I doubt that he has nearly as much dirty material on big players as Epstein... so he will be fine, I guess.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/20/technology/sam-bankman-fried-bail.html
let's see if the security cams are working this time
But I doubt that he has nearly as much dirty material on big players as Epstein... so he will be fine, I guess.
Those NY Times links that you have been providing suck.
NYT articles are behind paywalls.
Here's some links in OmegaStarScream's post in another thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5419710
It seems to depend from which country you watch these links. It is perfectly visible for me..
I surely wouldn't pay a dime for this cancer outlet
As far as suiciding himself.. SBF seems way more unstable.. but yeah of course, the connection that you are making has to do with how much SBF might know, and the theory that Epstein knew too much.. which yes, that seems to be a valid angle.. and I doubt that SBF knows too much.... just a fucking dumb kid bribing to get political influence and achieving it... so that dirt may likely end up coming out.. no one likes it when politician fawn over schemes like this that are so obviously corrupt, and some of them are likely going to find it necessary to change their tunes a bit, at least in terms of recognizing the outrageous bullshit that was going on in terms of attempts to buy influence and actually buying influence (which is so far alleged as ONLY one charge.. yet we will see how much some of that information ends up getting unravelled).. like I mentioned earlier.. I give little shits about which side this is on, and I do not see it as one side versus the other.. but just a bunch a bullshit when there are these kinds of buying of influence behaviors... and yeah, maybe I don't know enough at this time if some individuals might be wanting to skew matters to protect their own heads from rolling if the evidence is coming out too specifically in regards to involvement of some specific individuals.
Can't say anything against that... share most of it 1:1
By the way Gachapin, you did not notice my earlier attempt in this post to suck you into another BTC price-related bet?
Yes I got that. Thanks for your effort
Actually I was more interested in the guy stating we will see 20k+ on Christmas day. (Not bothering to search his comment, sorry)
However since shahzadafzal didn't answer my proposal for a bet yet, I was hesitant to poke the next guy with a bet, as I'm by no means a betting person and I didn't want to come off as one...
but some price predictions seem quite delicious for taking the opposite side of a bet. ...like 20k+ by Christmas or new ATH in 1st quarter of 2023
December 22, 2022, 02:08:31 AM
...if I'm not mistaken SBF gets charged in the same Southern District of NY as Jeffrey Epstein...
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/20/technology/sam-bankman-fried-bail.html
let's see if the security cams are working this time
But I doubt that he has nearly as much dirty material on big players as Epstein... so he will be fine, I guess.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/20/technology/sam-bankman-fried-bail.html
let's see if the security cams are working this time
But I doubt that he has nearly as much dirty material on big players as Epstein... so he will be fine, I guess.
Those NY Times links that you have been providing suck.
NYT articles are behind paywalls.
Here's some links in OmegaStarScream's post in another thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5419710
As far as suiciding himself.. SBF seems way more unstable.. but yeah of course, the connection that you are making has to do with how much SBF might know, and the theory that Epstein knew too much.. which yes, that seems to be a valid angle.. and I doubt that SBF knows too much.... just a fucking dumb kid bribing to get political influence and achieving it... so that dirt may likely end up coming out.. no one likes it when politician fawn over schemes like this that are so obviously corrupt, and some of them are likely going to find it necessary to change their tunes a bit, at least in terms of recognizing the outrageous bullshit that was going on in terms of attempts to buy influence and actually buying influence (which is so far alleged as ONLY one charge.. yet we will see how much some of that information ends up getting unravelled).. like I mentioned earlier.. I give little shits about which side this is on, and I do not see it as one side versus the other.. but just a bunch a bullshit when there are these kinds of buying of influence behaviors... and yeah, maybe I don't know enough at this time if some individuals might be wanting to skew matters to protect their own heads from rolling if the evidence is coming out too specifically in regards to involvement of some specific individuals.
By the way Gachapin, you did not notice my earlier attempt in this post to suck you into another BTC price-related bet?
December 22, 2022, 02:08:17 AM
@OP (Santa poster) and WO gays...sorry, I have no idea what "muscled" Santa manifested, lol.
Perhaps, I can guess, though.
Perhaps, I can guess, though.
Jump to: