Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 27077. (Read 26710201 times)

legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030
Sine secretum non libertas
imminent choo choo.

monkey is sad about bitcoin this week.

legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1001
This is the land of wolves now & you're not a wolf
Welp, we are back firmly under the $600 levels.   Still have not been able to consistently stay above.   Depending on how the auction goes...things could get interesting..
member
Activity: 101
Merit: 10
I do not think a 51% attack would mean the end. The pool would have to have a malicious intent. The people in the pool, probably would switch over to another pool (or the smaller pools could form together).

The 51% attack could only affect future blocks and not past blocks so, people could just stop using btc or blockchain could shut down until issue is resolved.

New modifications can prevent future attacks. I just do not see it as a serious threat. Does anyone agree with me on here (or am I missing something?)
I meant a 51% attack by a government.

From what I've read, it seems that a 51% attack can be detected pretty easily and dealt with when it happens, even without modifications to bitcoin to prevent it.  What I haven't seen is what exactly is the procedure to deal with it when it happens.  I think it is this uncertainty that has become an endless source of fear and doubt, because just having faith in the mining pools to act appropriately is not enough.
legendary
Activity: 3948
Merit: 11416
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
All I know is buying more back in the 330's looks so good right now Cheesy

I think that it would look good only if you were just beginning to invest in BTC or that you had recently sold your BTC investment to buy in at a lower price.  Otherwise $330s would be seriously problematic for BTC and would delay what seems to be our upcoming, pending and seemingly imminent choo choo.
sr. member
Activity: 644
Merit: 250
https://primedao.eth.link/#/
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
full member
Activity: 294
Merit: 100
https://www.jpmorgan.com/‎      https://Ghash.io - Join us - High reward - Lots of fun
"To have failed in everything, always, out of a love of discouragement." aka Bitcoin 2014  - Emil Cioran

So, what project are you managing at JP Morgan?  New JP Morgan coin?  The conflict of interest here is amusing.



I am not allowed to disclose that right now. Let´s just say, when you´ll hear about it Bitcoin will already have been hit Nagasaki style.

It doesn't take much to figure out what JP is doing.
What's low is trolling to downplay BTC...

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-12-10/chasing-bitcoin-jpm-preparing-unveil-its-own-electronic-currency
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
I do not think a 51% attack would mean the end. The pool would have to have a malicious intent. The people in the pool, probably would switch over to another pool (or the smaller pools could form together).

The 51% attack could only affect future blocks and not past blocks so, people could just stop using btc or blockchain could shut down until issue is resolved.

New modifications can prevent future attacks. I just do not see it as a serious threat. Does anyone agree with me on here (or am I missing something?)
I meant a 51% attack by a government.
sr. member
Activity: 546
Merit: 250

Possibly Tera means that there is finally a green 1wk macd candle on Bitstamp. It was sort of confirmed with high volume. It is barely lit  Smiley It could be positive if we are dealing with macd obsessed whale Smiley Long time ago I remember Tera said that a green 1 wk macd could indicate that it is a good time to buy (or maybe build on a position?). I can't tell if that was a joke or not. Tera likes to be a bit cryptic sometimes.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
I do not think a 51% attack would mean the end. The pool would have to have a malicious intent. The people in the pool, probably would switch over to another pool (or the smaller pools could form together).

The 51% attack could only affect future blocks and not past blocks so, people could just stop using btc or blockchain could shut down until issue is resolved.

New modifications can prevent future attacks. I just do not see it as a serious threat. Does anyone agree with me on here (or am I missing something?)
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
Only deposits via banks or payment processors are blocked.  Withdrawals via banks are still working, and the exchanges have found alternative not-so-convenient deposit channels.  But further restrictions are still possible.

Which means they can still ban it... Again... On the other hand, if they wanted to shut it down, wouldn't they have done it by now? It's been over six months!

*shakes head*
I don't think the Chinese government wants to shut it down necessarily.  There is a sizable bitcoin mining industry that depends on it and generates export revenue, and also many investors, big and small, who would lose money and get mad if they did.  They just want to make sure that it is not used as a currency in commerce (which they mostly did already) nor a payment medium for illegal trade, bribery, and foreign subversion (which they still seem to be worried about) or as a way for a few smart people to suck money from unwary investors and traders (which they may worry about once enough victims start complaining).

As time passes, bitcoin will become unstoppable. Only a major 51% attack could block it slow it down.
ftfy

I agree with your modification.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
Only deposits via banks or payment processors are blocked.  Withdrawals via banks are still working, and the exchanges have found alternative not-so-convenient deposit channels.  But further restrictions are still possible.

Which means they can still ban it... Again... On the other hand, if they wanted to shut it down, wouldn't they have done it by now? It's been over six months!

*shakes head*
I don't think the Chinese government wants to shut it down necessarily.  There is a sizable bitcoin mining industry that depends on it and generates export revenue, and also many investors, big and small, who would lose money and get mad if they did.  They just want to make sure that it is not used as a currency in commerce (which they mostly did already) nor a payment medium for illegal trade, bribery, and foreign subversion (which they still seem to be worried about) or as a way for a few smart people to suck money from unwary investors and traders (which they may worry about once enough victims start complaining).

As time passes, bitcoin will become unstoppable. Only a major 51% attack could block it slow it down.
ftfy
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
Only deposits via banks or payment processors are blocked.  Withdrawals via banks are still working, and the exchanges have found alternative not-so-convenient deposit channels.  But further restrictions are still possible.

Which means they can still ban it... Again... On the other hand, if they wanted to shut it down, wouldn't they have done it by now? It's been over six months!

*shakes head*
I don't think the Chinese government wants to shut it down necessarily.  There is a sizable bitcoin mining industry that depends on it and generates export revenue, and also many investors, big and small, who would lose money and get mad if they did.  They just want to make sure that it is not used as a currency in commerce (which they mostly did already) nor a payment medium for illegal trade, bribery, and foreign subversion (which they still seem to be worried about) or as a way for a few smart people to suck money from unwary investors and traders (which they may worry about once enough victims start complaining).

As time passes, bitcoin will become unstoppable. Only a major 51% attack could block it.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1003
Only deposits via banks or payment processors are blocked.  Withdrawals via banks are still working, and the exchanges have found alternative not-so-convenient deposit channels.  But further restrictions are still possible.

Which means they can still ban it... Again... On the other hand, if they wanted to shut it down, wouldn't they have done it by now? It's been over six months!

*shakes head*
I don't think the Chinese government wants to shut it down necessarily.  There is a sizable bitcoin mining industry that depends on it and generates export revenue, and also many investors, big and small, who would lose money and get mad if they did.  They just want to make sure that it is not used as a currency in commerce (which they mostly did already) nor a payment medium for illegal trade, bribery, and foreign subversion (which they still seem to be worried about) or as a way for a few smart people to suck money from unwary investors and traders (which they may worry about once enough victims start complaining).
full member
Activity: 336
Merit: 100
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
sr. member
Activity: 441
Merit: 250
Only deposits via banks or payment processors are blocked.  Withdrawals via banks are still working, and the exchanges have found alternative not-so-convenient deposit channels.  But further restrictions are still possible.

Which means they can still ban it... Again... On the other hand, if they wanted to shut it down, wouldn't they have done it by now? It's been over six months!

*shakes head*
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1003
China is so strange right now. Fiat transfers are supposed to be banned several times over now, so how would they even get yuan out of them if not via foreign accounts?

EDIT: (to clarify) ... Which should drive Stamp lower than Huobi, not the other way around which is what we've seen during last week.
Only deposits via banks or payment processors are blocked.  Withdrawals via banks are still working, and the exchanges have found alternative not-so-convenient deposit channels.  But further restrictions are still possible.
Jump to: