You can stretch them again , use a different time period , change the colors , but no way you can get those too match.
I really don;t understand why people have this need of matching current events with previous ones in order to "see' the future.
Me neither...
By the way, what is (are) the prossible explanation(s) for the April 2013 rally?
In hindsight I think a lot of liquidity was absorbed by the Twins. Bitcoin was getting positive press, there was a little run before halving that turned out to be a non event, but the statisticians / " quants" saw the liquidity trap and worked some magic and the herd followed the moment ASIC's arrived. The big kicker was the onset / arrival of ASIC's they were so successful GPU mining became obsolete although still profitable. It was a paradigm shift in that if you wanted Bitcoin you now had to buy it. The innovator stage ended and early adopter stage started.
Also the wave of new investor theory by rpietila timed perfectly with the successful halving event, (the code worked) and there was enough scarcely for everyone.
The same phenomenon happened when GPU mining was invented the increase in difficulty took the price from around a $0.01 to $0.30 and on to $1.00.
There is going to be another scarcity events in 2016 with halving and again when Bitcoin inflation falls in line with fiat inflation.
I think want added to the phenomenon is one of the first back of the envelope calculations people do when assessing Bitcoin is work out the value give world population and when they see it manifesting they reinvest there profits.
December's scarcity events was caused by liquidity moving to China and the West holding on all the good news out of the US.
What is at play now is distribution optimization in preparation for the next scarcity event. The coins need to be well distributed for the effect of value take hold.
//^HOLD TIGHT!!!! 
)