People here accuse me of saying 'the end of bitcoin' all the time so I might as well start actually doing it.
The problem I see with you entering the forex market besides not being able to see volume is that you will basically have to guess what future central bank liquidity decisions are and attempt to front run them. It's the ultimate rigged market.
Nonetheless there are useful ways to predict those outcomes. For example, the game theoretical approach used by Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, author of " The Predictioneer's Game" is powerful. It might be automated - but there's a lot of epistemic risk in the approach.
Another approach suggested during the Bernanke era is to use the *descriptive* models of central bank interest rate policies which he developed in academic life as though they were *prescriptive*. Too late for that now - Yellen never wrote such a study. Taylor's rule remains a powerfully informative prior.
One might gain some edge by interpreting rate curve models as boundary value problems in hilbert space, but I'm also skeptical of virtuoso tricks in general - K.I.S.S.
FX is characterized by "paradoxical" dynamics - which create a paranoid gaming recursion. However, for liquid pairs, there is enough fine-scale volatility so that you can usually turn a profit on pure maceration of the trade, even if you get the trend wrong (!) - which should almost never happen, since the broadest trend is read directly from interest rate differentials.
Whether that environment is suited to TERA's peculiar skills I dare not guess.
