Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 28233. (Read 26709655 times)
April 13, 2014, 09:53:11 PM
back in the game! =)
April 13, 2014, 09:47:08 PM
I once left my motorcycle outside downtown with the ignition hotwired. It wasnt there when I came back. I don't blame the city. I don't defame it or consider its people more or less criminal than those of other cities.
Come on, it was not that petty vandalism of Wikipedia that gave me that negative view of the bitcoin "ecosystem". It is the bulk of what I have read over these four months, especially the hype coming from the "great names". Bitcoin was crippled by two great disasters: first, its adoption by "libertarians", and, second, the blooming of the Chinese market. These developments turned what could have been a great e-commerce invention into the instrument of a legion of skimmers, scammers, and common criminals. Will the "pure" bitcoiners (if there are any left) have the will and power to get rid of those parasites, before they kill the idea? I don't see that happening.
April 13, 2014, 09:43:37 PM
Wikipedia can be corrected easily. Some people just can't seem to take a joke.
Yes it can: I (and thousand other editors) have spent many hours over these years fighting that sort of vandalism of Wikipedia. That is why I cannot take that joke lightly. 
April 13, 2014, 09:21:45 PM
I just noticed that on Apr/09 some "nice person" edited my entry in Wikipedia, adding the statement that I am an enthusiastic bitcoin investor and owner of one of the 500 largest bitcoin fortunes. (The anonymous "nice person" who did it used the IP 145.101.24.158, which is registered to "Openbare Bibliotheek Amsterdam, Keizersgracht 440, Nl-1016 Gd, The Netherlands".)
Apart from the attempt to harm me personally, I deeply resent the vandalization of Wikipedia for such purposes. But I should not be surprised. Unfortunately the bitcoin "ecosystem", from the "patriarchs" and "whales" down to the drooling daytraders, seems to be heavily infested by people who are capable of much worse things.
Which is another reason why I am extremely skeptical about the success of bitcoin. Why would the world agree to cede control of the global internet currency to such "adorable" people, and let them steal a large slice of its wealth?
Apart from the attempt to harm me personally, I deeply resent the vandalization of Wikipedia for such purposes. But I should not be surprised. Unfortunately the bitcoin "ecosystem", from the "patriarchs" and "whales" down to the drooling daytraders, seems to be heavily infested by people who are capable of much worse things.
Which is another reason why I am extremely skeptical about the success of bitcoin. Why would the world agree to cede control of the global internet currency to such "adorable" people, and let them steal a large slice of its wealth?
That's hilarious! Lighten up, Prof. Wikipedia can be corrected easily. Some people just can't seem to take a joke.
April 13, 2014, 09:12:18 PM
I just noticed that on Apr/09 some "nice person" edited my entry in Wikipedia, adding the statement that I am an enthusiastic bitcoin investor and owner of one of the 500 largest bitcoin fortunes. (The anonymous "nice person" who did it used the IP 145.101.24.158, which is registered to "Openbare Bibliotheek Amsterdam, Keizersgracht 440, Nl-1016 Gd, The Netherlands".)
Apart from the attempt to harm me personally, I deeply resent the vandalization of Wikipedia for such purposes. But I should not be surprised. Unfortunately the bitcoin "ecosystem", from the "patriarchs" and "whales" down to the drooling daytraders, seems to be heavily infested by people who are capable of much worse things.
Which is another reason why I am extremely skeptical about the success of bitcoin. Why would the world agree to cede control of the global internet currency to such "adorable" people, and let them steal a large slice of its wealth?
Apart from the attempt to harm me personally, I deeply resent the vandalization of Wikipedia for such purposes. But I should not be surprised. Unfortunately the bitcoin "ecosystem", from the "patriarchs" and "whales" down to the drooling daytraders, seems to be heavily infested by people who are capable of much worse things.
Which is another reason why I am extremely skeptical about the success of bitcoin. Why would the world agree to cede control of the global internet currency to such "adorable" people, and let them steal a large slice of its wealth?
I once left my motorcycle outside downtown with the ignition hotwired. It wasnt there when I came back. I don't blame the city. I don't defame it or consider its people more or less criminal than those of other cities.
Every day, people around the world are killed for fiat money.
April 13, 2014, 09:06:57 PM
I just noticed that on Apr/09 some "nice person" edited my entry in Wikipedia, adding the statement that I am an enthusiastic bitcoin investor and owner of one of the 500 largest bitcoin fortunes. (The anonymous "nice person" who did it used the IP 145.101.24.158, which is registered to "Openbare Bibliotheek Amsterdam, Keizersgracht 440, Nl-1016 Gd, The Netherlands".)
Apart from the attempt to harm me personally, I deeply resent the vandalization of Wikipedia for such purposes. But I should not be surprised. Unfortunately the bitcoin "ecosystem", from the "patriarchs" and "whales" down to the drooling daytraders, seems to be heavily infested by people who are capable of much worse things.
Which is another reason why I am extremely skeptical about the success of bitcoin. Why would the world agree to cede control of the global internet currency to such "adorable" people, and let them steal a large slice of its wealth?
Apart from the attempt to harm me personally, I deeply resent the vandalization of Wikipedia for such purposes. But I should not be surprised. Unfortunately the bitcoin "ecosystem", from the "patriarchs" and "whales" down to the drooling daytraders, seems to be heavily infested by people who are capable of much worse things.
Which is another reason why I am extremely skeptical about the success of bitcoin. Why would the world agree to cede control of the global internet currency to such "adorable" people, and let them steal a large slice of its wealth?
There are likely a lot of smart people into bitcoin and a lot of smart people reading this thread, too. And surely, you also know that there are a lot of very smart people into various developments related to bitcoin.
But Jorge you should also realize by NOW that merely b/c some supposed bitcoin enthusiast painted you as being connected to bitcoin, that does NOT change the fact that bitcoin in essence does NOT have people controlling it b/c it is decentralized and peer to peer. Also, even though there are various transfers of wealth going on within bitcoin from the old rich to the new rich and also some battles by the old rich (likely to keep the young punks from taking too much wealth), in the end profiting off of bitcoin is NOT the same as giving up fiat sovereignty to a bunch of thugs. The fact of the matter is that the current money system is filled with thugs and has been filled with thugs for a while.. big bankers, the Fed and also people running the IMF are filled with thugs of various sorts, who are heads above the level of any supposed bitcoin thugs.
April 13, 2014, 09:00:24 PM
April 13, 2014, 08:26:58 PM
I just noticed that on Apr/09 some "nice person" edited my entry in Wikipedia, adding the statement that I am an enthusiastic bitcoin investor and owner of one of the 500 largest bitcoin fortunes. (The anonymous "nice person" who did it used the IP 145.101.24.158, which is registered to "Openbare Bibliotheek Amsterdam, Keizersgracht 440, Nl-1016 Gd, The Netherlands".)
Apart from the attempt to harm me personally, I deeply resent the vandalization of Wikipedia for such purposes. But I should not be surprised. Unfortunately the bitcoin "ecosystem", from the "patriarchs" and "whales" down to the drooling daytraders, seems to be heavily infested by people who are capable of much worse things.
Which is another reason why I am extremely skeptical about the success of bitcoin. Why would the world agree to cede control of the global internet currency to such "adorable" people, and let them steal a large slice of its wealth?
Apart from the attempt to harm me personally, I deeply resent the vandalization of Wikipedia for such purposes. But I should not be surprised. Unfortunately the bitcoin "ecosystem", from the "patriarchs" and "whales" down to the drooling daytraders, seems to be heavily infested by people who are capable of much worse things.
Which is another reason why I am extremely skeptical about the success of bitcoin. Why would the world agree to cede control of the global internet currency to such "adorable" people, and let them steal a large slice of its wealth?
April 13, 2014, 08:23:36 PM
This is really suspicious. Somebody pulled a ton of orders so the priced shot down and then that possibly that same person scooped up the coins. The question is for what purpose? To hold onto them or to dump them again soon?
It is pretty hard to guess
We won't know when he dumps them; it could be any buyer with any motive and his motive may change
April 13, 2014, 08:20:19 PM
Additional options to have the repo government BTC marketm treat, but the long-term damage to the deep pockets that anyone can use, but this is the first time in the wrong hands, and / or stealing money from the currency in the attack. : Deterioration Wikipedia. As long as you do not trust the market to buy foreign currency not lose .., on the other hand, it is certain, or GS .. sometimes .. can not even run out of money ... and the inevitable price.
what
Wolfeen may have been using google translate.
Google degook.
Not an asian language
Edit: what? Not even a groan?
April 13, 2014, 08:12:11 PM
Additional options to have the repo government BTC marketm treat, but the long-term damage to the deep pockets that anyone can use, but this is the first time in the wrong hands, and / or stealing money from the currency in the attack. : Deterioration Wikipedia. As long as you do not trust the market to buy foreign currency not lose .., on the other hand, it is certain, or GS .. sometimes .. can not even run out of money ... and the inevitable price.
what
Wolfeen may have been using google translate.
Google degook.
April 13, 2014, 08:06:44 PM
What the fuck is going on?
It just keeps dropping
It just keeps dropping
It goes up then drop, goes up, drops lower than before
It will either go very low or go up for good at one point, I would bet for the later to happen before the end of the year but maybe after we tested 300 again
April 13, 2014, 08:00:22 PM
April 13, 2014, 07:57:17 PM
What the fuck is going on?
It just keeps dropping
It just keeps dropping
April 13, 2014, 07:33:39 PM
This is really suspicious. Somebody pulled a ton of orders so the priced shot down and then that possibly that same person scooped up the coins. The question is for what purpose? To hold onto them or to dump them again soon?
^it's called flipping ! =) *they call me flipper flipper faster than lightnin....!!!hehe
April 13, 2014, 07:28:25 PM
we had a large spike the last time the 1d macd crossed for 2 periods, the last really good bull trap @ 710...wonder how this Monday plays out... panic buys.. I'd prefer slow grind but you never know with bitcoin
but you never know with bitcoin April 13, 2014, 07:14:56 PM
This is really suspicious. Somebody pulled a ton of orders so the priced shot down and then that possibly that same person scooped up the coins. The question is for what purpose? To hold onto them or to dump them again soon?
April 13, 2014, 07:00:23 PM
April 13, 2014, 06:58:32 PM
I do recall that one of the posts you put in some words of attribution for someone... and probably in that case, it would have been good to note it (or maybe say it in small type ... ).. whatever, it was kind of a joke or a way to dig in at someone in a strategic way... ..
oh yeah, that one... was more of a joke but turns out she was very annoyed at having her character defiled on a public site.... funny that.
Yeah.. pretty funny if you are quoting some bear with bullish comments or even quoting a bull with bearish comments... or to say that such and such bear says that such and such bull is wonderful or the opposite.... and NOT really that big of a deal... whether you fixed it or NOT.. Probably, i would have fixed it... but then if someone is ordering me to fix something, then probably, i will be less inclined to fix it...
April 13, 2014, 06:55:16 PM
Additional options to have the repo government BTC marketm treat, but the long-term damage to the deep pockets that anyone can use, but this is the first time in the wrong hands, and / or stealing money from the currency in the attack. : Deterioration Wikipedia. As long as you do not trust the market to buy foreign currency not lose .., on the other hand, it is certain, or GS .. sometimes .. can not even run out of money ... and the inevitable price.
what
Wolfeen may have been using google translate.
Jump to: