Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 28839. (Read 26630760 times)

legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
To be honest the only thing that can collapse the price IMO are the week hands, (non believers) stolen Bitcoin and whales redistributing/ facilitating future wealth growth, and  I think a lot of coins @ the new order of magnetude have already been flushed.


The big question for me is "what really happened to the Gox coins."  I'm working on the hypothesis that the coins were stolen along time ago and have already been absorbed by the market.  If this is true, I can't see us dipping very deep and in fact think this is quite bullish medium term.  On the other hand, if a thief really has 750,000 BTC, I could imagine considerable selling pressure for some time.  


The first part of your theme seems possible........... but likely NOT complete b/c in my thinking it would take considerable time for 750k btc to be absorbed completely into the market.  The second alternative seems even less possible b/c it seems very unlikely (though possible) that the stealing would have ONLY been by one thief.

If the coins were originally stolen in the 2011 Goxhack, then it did take a long time to absorb them into the market. A year and a half before the next ATH.
legendary
Activity: 3934
Merit: 11405
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
To be honest the only thing that can collapse the price IMO are the week hands, (non believers) stolen Bitcoin and whales redistributing/ facilitating future wealth growth, and  I think a lot of coins @ the new order of magnetude have already been flushed.


The big question for me is "what really happened to the Gox coins."  I'm working on the hypothesis that the coins were stolen along time ago and have already been absorbed by the market.  If this is true, I can't see us dipping very deep and in fact think this is quite bullish medium term.  On the other hand, if a thief really has 750,000 BTC, I could imagine considerable selling pressure for some time.  


The first part of your theme seems possible........... but likely NOT complete b/c in my thinking it would take considerable time for 750k btc to be absorbed completely into the market.  The second alternative seems even less possible b/c it seems very unlikely (though possible) that the stealing would have ONLY been by one thief.
legendary
Activity: 3934
Merit: 11405
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
That was nice dump.  Shocked

caught me by complete surprise, i didn't think the first small move down to $620 was significant at all Tongue



Did you put your money where your mouth is?
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
World Class Cryptonaire
China's slice of the total volume increased slightly from 88% to 89%.
Their zero fee exchanges can churn thousands more btc than normal fee charging exchanges. [ ... ]

Of course.  But they do have that much volume, just as an exchange with higher fees or other handicaps may have less volume.

Obviously there are other useful measures, like book depth order, etc.  It would beinteresting to see them tabulated and compared.

Nevertheless, Huobi and OKCoin do seem to have greater liquidity and stability, a narrower spread, etc..  They do seem to lead the market most of the time.  So volume, independently of the reason, may be an important variable after all..


That volume is most likely just bots exchanging and re-exchanging the same coins even for a possibility of a 0.00001% gain since there is no fee. Does high volume of exchanges keep the price more steady? I think so because it creates a more baseline value of each coin at that moment (multiple "people" buying/selling around the same price). Are they the ones that lead bitcoin price changes? I don't think so, I really think they are reactive to other bitcoin markets which involve more human transactions, even if it means that their bots have large and quick responses to subtle changes in the other exchanges making it appear although they lead the exchange price. Just IMO.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1003
China's slice of the total volume increased slightly from 88% to 89%.
Their zero fee exchanges can churn thousands more btc than normal fee charging exchanges. [ ... ]

Of course.  But they do have that much volume, just as an exchange with higher fees or other handicaps may have less volume.

Obviously there are other useful measures, like book depth order, etc.  It would beinteresting to see them tabulated and compared.

Nevertheless, Huobi and OKCoin do seem to have greater liquidity and stability, a narrower spread, etc..  They do seem to lead the market most of the time.  So volume, independently of the reason, may be an important variable after all..
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 508
5m says bounce, just as 1200 of the ask at 620 gets removed... just a little one, though. Cheesy

legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
Buy when everybody is pessimistic.

We might not be there yet but it's close.

How can we be close to pessimistic? Bitcoin was $100 a year ago. True despair-pessimism is a long WAY DOWN.

We've been through so many of these rally/corrections that we've learned to front-run the cycle, so it won't go that far down. It always seems different this time but in hindsight it's not.
or... the people who are front-running the "cycle" (which is an imaginary thing actually) are the only reason the price is as high as it is now, and this is just a dead cat bounce before it goes down again.

Dead cat bounce speculation is part of the cycle too. If Bitcoin was going to fail for any reason other than a superior technology rendering it obsolete, it would have failed by now. Anything else only delays without preventing the next ramp. Chinese and Russian hostility to crypto will have the effect of causing western policy makers to support it. The enemy of my enemy and all that.
Bitcoin doesn't need to "fail" for it to be grossly overpriced by speculators and for the speculation bubble to deflate. Refer to 2011. Think of it as a "supercycle".

The 2011 bubble saw an increase from 10 cents to 32 dollars! Proportionally speaking, the 18 month consolidation period before the next rally roughly equates to a three month consolidation period of about three to five months after a ramp from ~$150 to $1163. We are right on schedule.  

What if the ramp was not from $150 to $1163, but from $15 to $1163, and there were 5 months in 2013 as an "intermission".

$32 is 320X $0.10  $1163 is 77.5X $15, so the wait until the next ATH should be only ~1/4th as long.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
World Class Cryptonaire
Bitstamp prices now match btc-e prices as I stated Smiley

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5758585



I'll be doing another analysis of the market within the next two days or so. But I still expect the $550-590 range before we start another upward trend.

According to my graph below we are still at a higher price per bitcoin than would be predicted with an R squared of >0.9

legendary
Activity: 3934
Merit: 11405
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
it is not a "SIGNIFICANT MOVE" as far as bitcoin price action is concerned, but it carries information in the short-term.

Exactly. Earlier today when I posted a chart illustrating the support breach this morning and lack of pressure to fuel a strong bounce, I was told I was over-analyzing. And I thought, do people around here wait for a sell-off to conclude that the price might go down? I'm trying to close or accumulate position before that occurs....

yeah it seems many traders around here don't understand the idea of keeping ahead of the market. chasing the market is more obvious, but obviously less profitable Tongue

it also doesn't require empirical methods of constructing a workable signalling theory like the one i outlined in my last post. but then again, many traders here don't even "believe in" TA at all Wink

Why does it even matter if some traders have different points of view than you. So What...?  Not everyone here is a day trader, and sometimes BTC movements take place based on factors other than trend lines.  Surely, if I am fairly confident that a certain movement is going to take place, then I will act based on that confidence.  One of the problems with bitcoin; however, is that one or two whales can change the direction - and especially catch the less experienced "traders" off guard (to the extent that some of us are still engaging in trading, in spite of proclamations to the contrary).
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1006
100 satoshis -> ISO code
Looks like a spike down to $575 imminent.

China's slice of the total volume increased slightly from 88% to 89%.

Their zero fee exchanges can churn thousands more btc than normal fee charging exchanges. As you are a mathematician you will know that repetitive 0.2% slices will quickly whittle down any large amount being churned with a small probability of an edge.

hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
This seems more like that long squeeze, however...I just think somebody is picking up as many cheap coins as possible..those trying to kick start the markets with large buy orders could' have picked up more letting people dump em to them...add some of the low volume as of late and you get a prime time to squeeeeze
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
This is actually the worst order book (ratio) I have ever seen in Bitcoin. All of the gox orderbooks in apr-jul 2013 even at their worst looked better than this.

Are investors losing their passion or just keeping their money off the books....   b/c there could still be big investors planning to come into the bitcoin space, but NOT showing their cards at the moment... no?
You can speculate about 'big investors not showing their cards' with ANY bid, even with a large bid they can still be there. I'd much rather speculate about them being there with a 100M USD order book than a 12M USD order book - there would probably be more of them too. Speculating about something I can't see and speculating about sneaky buyers suddenly making an appearance to save me from falling off a cliff is not how I like to trade. Also, the tiny order book represents a lack of maturity in the current market. There should be more there whether there are hidden buyers or not.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1003
Total trade volume today (Mon Mar/17 00:00--23:59 UTC) was ~144 kBTC.  That is  87% more than yesterday's (77 kBTC), but still 43% less than last Monday Mar/10, and somewhat below the average of recent weeks.

Trade volume outside China more than doubled (from 8.2 to 18 kBTC) but is still 46% less than last Monday's.  Bitstamp's almost tripled (from 3.30 to 9.17), but BTC-e's grew only 49% (to 3.90 kBTC). Bitfinex 's volume almost doubled (from 1.90 to 3.76) and almost caught up with BTC-e, but is still only 30% of its volume last Monday.

Trade volume in China increased 83% since yesterday (from 69 to 126 kBTC) but is still 58% of last Monday's.  Huobi recovered its lead over OKCoin (51% versus 47% of China's volume, respectively).

China's slice of the total volume increased slightly from 88% to 89%.

EDIT: that is on the exchanges that I monitor (see my previous post).  Are there any significant exchanges besides those?
legendary
Activity: 3934
Merit: 11405
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
This is actually the worst order book (ratio) I have ever seen in Bitcoin. All of the gox orderbooks in apr-jul 2013 even at their worst looked better than this.

Are investors losing their passion or just keeping their money off the books....   b/c there could still be big investors planning to come into the bitcoin space, but NOT showing their cards at the moment... no?
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
Buy when everybody is pessimistic.

We might not be there yet but it's close.

How can we be close to pessimistic? Bitcoin was $100 a year ago. True despair-pessimism is a long WAY DOWN.

We've been through so many of these rally/corrections that we've learned to front-run the cycle, so it won't go that far down. It always seems different this time but in hindsight it's not.
or... the people who are front-running the "cycle" (which is an imaginary thing actually) are the only reason the price is as high as it is now, and this is just a dead cat bounce before it goes down again.

Dead cat bounce speculation is part of the cycle too. If Bitcoin was going to fail for any reason other than a superior technology rendering it obsolete, it would have failed by now. Anything else only delays without preventing the next ramp. Chinese and Russian hostility to crypto will have the effect of causing western policy makers to support it. The enemy of my enemy and all that.
Bitcoin doesn't need to "fail" for it to be grossly overpriced by speculators and for the speculation bubble to deflate. Refer to 2011. Think of it as a "supercycle".

The 2011 bubble saw an increase from 10 cents to 32 dollars! Proportionally speaking, the 18 month consolidation period before the next rally roughly equates to a three month consolidation period of about three to five months after a ramp from ~$150 to $1163. We are right on schedule. 

What if the ramp was not from $150 to $1163, but from $15 to $1163, and there were 5 months in 2013 as an "intermission".
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
Buy when everybody is pessimistic.

We might not be there yet but it's close.

How can we be close to pessimistic? Bitcoin was $100 a year ago. True despair-pessimism is a long WAY DOWN.

We've been through so many of these rally/corrections that we've learned to front-run the cycle, so it won't go that far down. It always seems different this time but in hindsight it's not.
or... the people who are front-running the "cycle" (which is an imaginary thing actually) are the only reason the price is as high as it is now, and this is just a dead cat bounce before it goes down again.

Dead cat bounce speculation is part of the cycle too. If Bitcoin was going to fail for any reason other than a superior technology rendering it obsolete, it would have failed by now. Anything else only delays without preventing the next ramp. Chinese and Russian hostility to crypto will have the effect of causing western policy makers to support it. The enemy of my enemy and all that.
Bitcoin doesn't need to "fail" for it to be grossly overpriced by speculators and for the speculation bubble to deflate. Refer to 2011. Think of it as a "supercycle".

The 2011 bubble saw an increase from 10 cents to 32 dollars! Proportionally speaking, the 18 month consolidation period before the next rally roughly equates to a consolidation period of about three to five months after a ramp from ~$150 to $1163. We are right on schedule.  
legendary
Activity: 3934
Merit: 11405
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"

So, if loss of bid depth on both sides is dramatically measurable, that likely translates to a short-term loss of interest in BTC and likely downward trends....

I say it means hoarding has really begun.

a WILD CONJECTURE has appeared! Tongue

pretty sure it was just traders shifting the position of their orders in response to the first significant price action in almost a week. i forgot how far you guys in this thread will extrapolate and exaggerate any innocent data...


I would NOT describe a $5 to $10 downward trickling movement as a "significant price action."

then you have something to learn about price movement. not only is a $15 movement in a 6-hour period the largest range we have seen in about a week, the volume associated with the movement is the largest we've seen in that same time frame. this makes it significant in magnitude if only in comparison to the watching-paint-dry-caliber price behavior this past week. it is also significant in that it may herald a steady increase in volatility from here on out after that painfully quiet consolidation.


Looks like you are turning out to be correct; however, at the time that I wrote, the movement was only in its budding stages.  Also, I do NOT claim to be any expert, so I remain curious why you felt it necessary to engage in patronizing... Anyhow, thanks for the fairly detailed response...
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
Buy when everybody is pessimistic.

We might not be there yet but it's close.

How can we be close to pessimistic? Bitcoin was $100 a year ago. True despair-pessimism is a long WAY DOWN.

We've been through so many of these rally/corrections that we've learned to front-run the cycle, so it won't go that far down. It always seems different this time but in hindsight it's not.
or... the people who are front-running the "cycle" (which is an imaginary thing actually) are the only reason the price is as high as it is now, and this is just a dead cat bounce before it goes down again.

Dead cat bounce speculation is part of the cycle too. If Bitcoin was going to fail for any reason other than a superior technology rendering it obsolete, it would have failed by now. Anything else only delays without preventing the next ramp. Chinese and Russian hostility to crypto will have the effect of causing western policy makers to support it. The enemy of my enemy and all that.
Bitcoin doesn't need to "fail" for it to be grossly overpriced by speculators and for the speculation bubble to deflate. Refer to 2011. Think of it as a "supercycle".
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
Buy when everybody is pessimistic.

We might not be there yet but it's close.

How can we be close to pessimistic? Bitcoin was $100 a year ago. True despair-pessimism is a long WAY DOWN.

We've been through so many of these rally/corrections that we've learned to front-run the cycle, so it won't go that far down. It always seems different this time but in hindsight it's not.
or... the people who are front-running the "cycle" (which is an imaginary thing actually) are the only reason the price is as high as it is now, and this is just a dead cat bounce before it goes down again.

Dead cat bounce speculation is part of the cycle too. If Bitcoin was going to fail for any reason other than a superior technology rendering it obsolete, it would have failed by now. Anything else only delays without preventing the next ramp. Chinese and Russian hostility to crypto will have the effect of causing western policy makers to support it. The enemy of my enemy and all that.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1003
Daily volumes of BTC trade to/from USD and other national currencies (in kBTC):

             !    Mon !    Tue !    Wed !    Thu !    Fri !    Sat !   Sun !    Mon !                     
  EXCHANGE   !  03/10 !  03/11 !  03/12 !  03/13 !  03/14 !  03/15 ! 03/16 !  03/17 ! Currencies considered

  Bitstamp   |  13.40 |   9.17 |  12.70 |   6.73 |   8.68 |   2.20 |  3.30 |   9.17 | USD                 
  BTC-e      |   7.16 |   5.09 |   7.96 |   7.43 |   3.76 |   2.55 |  2.62 |   3.90 | USD,EUR,RUR         
  BitFinEx   |  11.60 |   3.63 |   7.29 |   3.31 |   5.53 |   1.74 |  1.90 |   3.76 | USD                 
  Kraken     |   0.57 |   0.45 |   0.56 |   0.40 |   0.48 |   0.34 |  0.15 |   0.48 | EUR                 
  Bitcoin.DE |   0.39 |   0.41 |   0.37 |   0.35 |   0.20 |   0.12 |  0.12 |   0.40 | EUR                 
  CaVirtEx   |   0.13 |   0.18 |   0.13 |   0.13 |   0.11 |   0.06 |  0.06 |   0.10 | CAD                 
  CampBX     |   0.05 |   0.06 |   0.04 |   0.03 |   0.06 |   0.03 |  0.02 |   0.07 | USD                 

  SUBTOTAL   |  33.30 |  18.99 |  29.05 |  18.38 |  18.82 |   7.04 |  8.17 |  17.88 |                     

  Huobi      |  95.10 |  55.00 |  77.90 |  65.40 |  78.40 |  36.50 | 27.00 |  63.80 | CNY                 
  OKCoin     | 119.00 |  68.50 |  90.60 |  60.70 |  97.80 |  55.40 | 40.00 |  59.00 | CNY                 
  BTC-China  |   3.34 |   3.11 |   3.16 |   2.89 |   2.97 |   1.13 |  1.51 |   2.74 | CNY                 
  Bter       |   0.27 |   0.34 |   0.49 |   0.26 |   0.19 |   0.35 |  0.28 |   0.34 | CNY                 

  SUBTOTAL   | 217.71 | 126.95 | 172.15 | 129.25 | 179.36 |  93.38 | 68.79 | 125.88 |                     

  TOTAL      | 251.01 | 145.94 | 201.20 | 147.63 | 198.18 | 100.42 | 76.96 | 143.76 |                     

All numbers were collected by hand from the site http://bitcoinwisdom.com. Beware of possible errors.

For each exchange, the numbers include only the trade volume to/from the currencies listed in the rightmost column. Trade between BTC and other cryptocoins, such as LiteCoin, is NOT included.

Dates on the header line are UTC. Specifically, "01/15" means "from 01/15 00:00:00 UTC to 01/15 23:59:59 UTC". (Beware that the same period may span part of day 01/14 or part of day 01/16 in your local time zone.)
Jump to: