Dogecoin will survive.
On another note. I am starting to get sick of these price ranges of BTC.
Lets get some action.
Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 28902. (Read 26609636 times)
March 11, 2014, 09:37:21 AM
March 11, 2014, 09:23:17 AM
Also I know most people aren't interested but DOGE is seriously crashing right now.
I lol'd
March 11, 2014, 09:20:18 AM
Alts crashing as people rush to BTC in anticipation of movement one way or another. IMHO
March 11, 2014, 09:18:34 AM
I was merely attempting to refer to Octaft's hypothetical in which he seemed to be attempting to describe a preset amount (such as 30%). Something like this could be either compelled or voluntary... I was merely playing along with the hypothetical... but I admit that I may have lost the point about whether such a hypothetical was going to compel such contributions or leave them up to individuals.
There is no such thing as compelled charity. If it is compelled, it is not charity.
So, will you be voluntarily donating, or not?
March 11, 2014, 09:12:28 AM
I was merely attempting to refer to Octaft's hypothetical in which he seemed to be attempting to describe a preset amount (such as 30%). Something like this could be either compelled or voluntary... I was merely playing along with the hypothetical... but I admit that I may have lost the point about whether such a hypothetical was going to compel such contributions or leave them up to individuals.
There is no such thing as compelled charity. If it is compelled, it is not charity.
Surely, we must all realize by NOW that certain individuals, including Billyjoeallen (based on his earlier comments), is NOT going to contribute if voluntary ... unless such a charity meets all his likely impossible to accomplish and vague parameters..
I realize no such thing. I see nothing that he has said that has any relation to his willingness to pay voluntarily to charities. That is all in your imagination. I expect that he deliberately avoided making any such mention specifically to hook you with you biases and prejudices.
By the way, would you mind stating your definition of the word "theft"? I would love to hear what that is.
March 11, 2014, 09:11:15 AM
Also I know most people aren't interested but DOGE is seriously crashing right now.
uh...yeah
and I am very very dissapoint that this thread did not inform me in time
dumb thread...bah
March 11, 2014, 09:06:03 AM
Also I know most people aren't interested but DOGE is seriously crashing right now.
March 11, 2014, 09:05:12 AM
10k bfx wall is back
They obviously do not want to sell and I am betting they are using a pretty high amount of margin to execute it. The fact that weak hands are actually selling because of it is sad.
I just do not believe any major walls that are placed on BFX compare to BSP. With margin and being able to short on BFX most of the time any walls that are placed on BFX will be pulled once it simply gets near the price. I do not even think BFX has that many coins sitting on their BSP account to sell that many coins. If he was willing to sell that many coins, it would completely wipe out BFX's order book like every time there has been a spike. There is a reason why that wall has been holding for so long on BFX compared to if it was placed on BSP. There really aren't any major players on BFX like BSP wanting to even remotely buy that many coins.
Agree, nobody risks being called on a short like than in a stagnent market on high leverage. I too beleive its an advertisment for a sale with no slippage for either party.
They have some way of pulling it as soon as price reaches it. I tried to buy into that wall yesterday on bitfinex and somehow didn't seem to get any piece of it before it was pulled.
March 11, 2014, 09:02:35 AM
Also I know most people aren't interested but DOGE is seriously crashing right now.
March 11, 2014, 09:02:25 AM
March 11, 2014, 08:56:50 AM
Exactly, thats the point. People do have the same kinds of weapons as your gangs, so everywhere a gang would form, a counter-gang would form, and the winning gang would surely be angry at the losing gang (especially if fatalities occurred), and the losing gang would flee to a surrounding area (or get killed off). Once they flee to a surrounding area, they will pick what they think is the winning gang there, and try to join it, resulting in each area being run by 1 gang constantly in fear of being taken over by its counter-gang (who they will naturally call "criminals") and surrounding gangs who have allied with "criminals."
And then the winning gangs become governments and we're back to square 1. The problem here is human nature: Humans like to form teams, and the winning team tends to punish the losing team, who then wishes to get revenge.
Decentralized violence begets more violence, and violence begets centralization. The only way of avoiding centralization is either reducing it just enough so that no violence breaks out, but government is still sufficiently small, or by somehow getting rid of it entirely and replacing it with a system to prevent violence hands down.
And then the winning gangs become governments and we're back to square 1. The problem here is human nature: Humans like to form teams, and the winning team tends to punish the losing team, who then wishes to get revenge.
Decentralized violence begets more violence, and violence begets centralization. The only way of avoiding centralization is either reducing it just enough so that no violence breaks out, but government is still sufficiently small, or by somehow getting rid of it entirely and replacing it with a system to prevent violence hands down.
No. Most people just want to be left to live a decent life and provide for their families, not join up and form gangs. At one time, gang-like behavior was sustainable and has carried through into current governments but that doesn't mean they would necessarily arise again with the tools available to the modern citizen.
March 11, 2014, 08:55:50 AM
tons of fucking support doe
For now, its amazing how quick it disapears when the price starts falling through it.
March 11, 2014, 08:53:39 AM
These are are real fantasy land examples, if you are of the belief that you could establish infrastructure and/or practices to accomplish either one of these without some kinds of community consensus (in other words govt-like input)
Naked assertions are so tiresome.
March 11, 2014, 08:49:55 AM
motherfucker
why is price going down now
i will be a bit surprised if we go lower then 580 now tbh
why is price going down now
i will be a bit surprised if we go lower then 580 now tbh
It has nothing to do with gox losing it's customers funds and therefor destroying trust towards the bitcoin market system. It also doesn't have anything to do with the nature of bitcoin, where the price has to be in a constant rise, or else it will start to fall.
My bet goes that it's all a one big conspiracy orchestrated by banksters who take orders from the alien reptoids.
March 11, 2014, 08:49:05 AM
Plus cows laying down.
+1 Bovine Recumbency Orientation ftw
March 11, 2014, 08:48:48 AM
Walls on the move..
March 11, 2014, 08:43:12 AM
tons of fucking support doe
March 11, 2014, 08:42:02 AM
I think this guy listened to your doubts and is now building his wall up on stamp.
March 11, 2014, 08:39:01 AM
motherfucker
why is price going down now
i will be a bit surprised if we go lower then 580 now tbh
why is price going down now
i will be a bit surprised if we go lower then 580 now tbh
March 11, 2014, 08:31:35 AM
If you meet a stranger somewhere in the wilderness, what is your first thought? Kill him and steal his boots?
My first thought is 'I wonder if I can keep this guy from killing me for my boots'
Good. If both have this thought, the encounter will end good, possibly with some trade of information or other things for the benefit of both. Otherwise, you have a plan for some kind of self defense.
Jump to: