Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 28953. (Read 26611732 times)

zyk
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 101
and up we go
24h Volume: 20326 BTC
It's hard to be very excited.

I more exited that there wasn't any big panic reaction on this sell off  Smiley
I'd much rather see a high volume panic get sold into the hands of whales and bounce back hard than this low volume drift down.

but the bottom is certainly reached ? all insiders decided better not to run with peoples money yet?
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
Moderator
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1ztyp9/the_twobit_idiot_coup_or_death_for_the_bitcoin/

2-bit guy now claims that foundation members had inside info and were able to get their money out while everyone else got screwed. He is threatening to release info on Monday. Interesting.

 Shocked

Awesome
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
new poll

Where did you get that 613.5 from ?

its the current daily low

right

you can go here http://bitcoinity.org/markets/bitstamp/USD
set it to 24hr
and look at the top right "change: -4.84%      high: 670.0      low: 613.5"
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Ultranode
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1ztyp9/the_twobit_idiot_coup_or_death_for_the_bitcoin/

2-bit guy now claims that foundation members had inside info and were able to get their money out while everyone else got screwed. He is threatening to release info on Monday. Interesting.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
and up we go
24h Volume: 20326 BTC
It's hard to be very excited.

I more exited that there wasn't any big panic reaction on this sell off  Smiley
I'd much rather see a high volume panic get sold into the hands of whales and bounce back hard than this low volume drift down.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 540
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
Moderator
650 is probably the new 820 for the next 2-3 weeks
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
and up we go
24h Volume: 20326 BTC
It's hard to be very excited.
legendary
Activity: 2186
Merit: 1213
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500


probably a long sideways trading period coming up. zzzzzzz
legendary
Activity: 2186
Merit: 1213
Can't belive poeple are still selling... This is probably the bottom (i hope  Smiley ). If nothing else, it was a good day for trading.

this is probably the end od bitcoin as we knew it....sayonara..GTFO

Change your dealer please...
Ignore.

Yeah my ignore list also grows daily  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
Satoshi was hal finney.

Very unlikely IMO.

1) He would have break a basic OPSEC principle: compartimentalization. Never mix your true identity with your anonymous identity. And Satoshi followed OPSEC very strictly.

2) It seems very unplausible that a focused person like Satoshi (the same argument is valid for Hal) would have spent so much time debating with himself, that would be borderline schizofrenic behaviour, and that doesn't fit neither Satoshi nor Hal.

In any case the crucial point is 1). Imagine you want to be anonymous to avoid the heat - being the recipient of the very first bitcoin transaction and one of the very first developers defeats that purpose. Imagine that shit hits the fan and the Gov goes hard against Bitcoin: Hal would be one of the first (if not the first) to receive a very uncomfortable visit, in a "less eliminate/interrogate all the possible targets" he would be on the top of the list - and that's an epic OPSEC failure that would lead to almost assured failure.

On the contrary, Nick Szabo (Nakamoto Satoshi) fits incredibly well. It is painfully obvious that Nick is one of the main (if not THE main) inspirators of Satoshi's work. Again: Nick was the inventor of the "smart contracts" concept and he developed extensive work on blockchain-like decentralized ledgers; his bit-gold is simply "bitcoin beta", but he is not even cited as a reference on the Bitcoin whitepaper - the only plausible reason for such ommission is again, OPSEC/compartimentalization. Similarly, Szabo never wrote about Bitcoin, despite it is clearly the system he has been writing about from 1996 to 2005. Every question to Szabo about BTC is duly ignored, he never wrote/commented about Bitcoin, even if it seems like the realization of years of his work. Additionally, the last paper on e-currency he wrote was published in 2005, and his very last comment on that matter (which was a central part of his work for at least 9 years) was published on his blog in 2008, shortly before the bitcoin paper was published.

Given the above and other many factors (similarity in writing style and political views, etc.) I give 75% chance that NS is SN. This obviouslly doesn't mean I want Nick to be "outed": privacy is a fundamental right that should never be taken away for anybody.


Rampion, are you Nick Szabo!?  Wink

You have convinced me.  I have read some of his writings. He is brilliant and obviously smart enough to stay anonymous.  I wonder where his though!?  Does he still teach at George Washington University?  Has he bought a private island somewhere?  
member
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
zyk
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 101
Can't belive poeple are still selling... This is probably the bottom (i hope  Smiley ). If nothing else, it was a good day for trading.

this is probably the end od bitcoin as we knew it....sayonara..GTFO
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018
Satoshi was hal finney.

Very unlikely IMO.

1) He would have break a basic OPSEC principle: compartimentalization. Never mix your true identity with your anonymous identity. And Satoshi followed OPSEC very strictly.

2) It seems very unplausible that a focused person like Satoshi (the same argument is valid for Hal) would have spent so much time debating with himself, that would be borderline schizofrenic behaviour, and that doesn't fit neither Satoshi nor Hal.

In any case the crucial point is 1). Imagine you want to be anonymous to avoid the heat - being the recipient of the very first bitcoin transaction and one of the very first developers defeats that purpose. Imagine that shit hits the fan and the Gov goes hard against Bitcoin: Hal would be one of the first (if not the first) to receive a very uncomfortable visit, in a "let's eliminate/interrogate all the possible targets" scenario he would be on the top of the list - and that's an epic OPSEC failure that would lead to almost assured failure.

On the contrary, Nick Szabo (Nakamoto Satoshi) fits incredibly well. It is painfully obvious that Nick is one of the main (if not THE main) inspirators of Satoshi's work. Again: Nick was the inventor of the "smart contracts" concept and he developed extensive work on blockchain-like decentralized ledgers; his bit-gold is simply "bitcoin beta", but he is not even cited as a reference on the Bitcoin whitepaper - the only plausible reason for such ommission is again, OPSEC/compartimentalization. Similarly, Szabo almost never wrote about Bitcoin, despite it is clearly the system he has been writing about from 1996 to 2005. Every question to Szabo about BTC is duly ignored, he just wrote/commented about Bitcoin once after many questions, even if it clearly is the realization of years of his work. Additionally, the last paper on e-currency he wrote was published in 2005, and his very last comment on that matter (which was a central part of his work for at least 9 years) was published on his blog in 2008, shortly before the bitcoin paper was published.

Given the above and other many factors (similarity in writing style and political views, etc.) I give 75% chance that NS is SN. This obviously doesn't mean I want Nick to be "outed": privacy is a fundamental right that should never be taken away for anybody.
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
YES! just bought back the coins I sold at $650-675!  all my coins back and sitting in profit. If we go below $600, I'm gonna turn that profit into MOAR COIZ!!!
hero member
Activity: 601
Merit: 503
seems like the gox-Selling-Bot is operating on bitstamp now. Look at the movements in the last hour.
Jump to: