Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 30036. (Read 26710135 times)

legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
Blitz:The price affects the perception of the news
Must be priced in already.
member
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1311
Time to fondly remember the greatest proudhon moment. It occurred at the April 2013 peak, when he finally turned from bear to bull...


Well, if we made it to $266 then maybe I was wrong and the market is growing enough to sustain the growth.


Followed by a mass sell off by all.



Yes, as I foresaw, and had confirmed via good bad sources, the market has crashed and continues to fail to make new ATHs.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
Back to the hearings... this was the statement that basically negated the need for the hearings in the first place. We do not need permission to use bitcoin.

A quite different tone, though, was struck by Carol van Cleef, an attorney specializing in financial regulation, who urged Lawsky and his panel towards speed in establishing standards. "Time is of the essence," van Cleef exhorted. "Innovation will adapt to new regulation but it will not wait for regulation. [Bitcoin service development] will shift to other jurisdictions, taking jobs and the resulting wealth with it. The true losers will be U.S. residents."

http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2014/01/30/bitcoin-hearings-wells-fargo/

yup. no china crash & no time to waste...


CCMF???


 Grin
full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 100
Back to the hearings... this was the statement that basically negated the need for the hearings in the first place. We do not need permission to use bitcoin.

A quite different tone, though, was struck by Carol van Cleef, an attorney specializing in financial regulation, who urged Lawsky and his panel towards speed in establishing standards. "Time is of the essence," van Cleef exhorted. "Innovation will adapt to new regulation but it will not wait for regulation. [Bitcoin service development] will shift to other jurisdictions, taking jobs and the resulting wealth with it. The true losers will be U.S. residents."

http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2014/01/30/bitcoin-hearings-wells-fargo/
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 501
trolling the media, how epic   Grin

proudhon should make a living from this.

legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
7 AM in China on the 31st, the world hasn't imploded.

Now can we PLEASE... get back to CCMFing...

i wonder how long the market will wait.

my guess is we will be looking to BTCChina for volume to pick up, this will confirm CNY deposits  are in fact coming in and chinaman is back in the game. this could take a few days... i'm sure we'd all feel more comfortable with an official word from chinese government that this deposit method is permissible... but my guess is we won't get that, and we'll simply think no news is good news. IF china doesn't not accept this, and forces BTCChina to close, i wouldn't expect a huge crash (i think we'd just erase any gains starting from today, and maybe dip a little lower...), I think that china being out of the game is mostly priced in by now, and with all the gr8 news coming from the west i'd say any sizeable panic sell because of a offical chain bitcoin ban is tremendous buying opportunity.

will china let it be? if so how high will bitcoin go!? if not, do you agree the subsequent crash can be viewed as an emotionally driven panic sell off / good buying opportunity?

so many questions so little time!

bitcoin is not boring!


legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
Time to fondly remember the greatest proudhon moment. It occurred at the April 2013 peak, when he finally turned from bear to bull...


Well, if we made it to $266 then maybe I was wrong and the market is growing enough to sustain the growth.


Followed by a mass sell off by all.



the massive sell off surely immediately turned him back from bull to bear. with even more reliable only confirmed sources.
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1006
100 satoshis -> ISO code
Time to fondly remember the greatest proudhon moment. It occurred at the April 2013 peak, when he finally turned from bear to bull...


Well, if we made it to $266 then maybe I was wrong and the market is growing enough to sustain the growth.


Followed by a mass sell off by all.

sr. member
Activity: 346
Merit: 250
for the fanatics... ^^

legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000
Look at this... lol
Quote
This doomsday scenario was echoed by another used called 'Proudhon', who has contributed to the forum for three years. The user said bitcoin's fall from $1,200 to its current level of around $900 will "continue until bitcoins are worth $0."

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/chinese-new-year-bitcoin-ban-end-days-or-empty-threat-1434495


It would be epic if Proudhun gets quoted on CNBC.  Shocked Grin
More epic they play the Proudhon song as an intro to Bitcoin doom and gloom.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
7 AM in China on the 31st, the world hasn't imploded.

Now can we PLEASE... get back to CCMFing...
Is that pronounced "Choo Choo Mother F*ckering"?
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000
Look at this... lol
Quote
This doomsday scenario was echoed by another used called 'Proudhon', who has contributed to the forum for three years. The user said bitcoin's fall from $1,200 to its current level of around $900 will "continue until bitcoins are worth $0."

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/chinese-new-year-bitcoin-ban-end-days-or-empty-threat-1434495

LOL, I hope they Google Proudhon and read up on Wikipedia  Smiley

They forgot to add when he changes his tune buy!
Jump to: