62/38 is actually conservative, considering that (in Mt.Gox) any random week has in 64% probability been positive, only 36% negative.
Serious stuff...
Top before Christmas?
350?
500?
1000?
(Stamp price)
Is it really necessary to say "stamp price"
Considering that Gox price would be...
360?
512?
1015?
LOL.
And considering coinbase has been just under Gox (at least earlier this week it was), so now the "Goxbux" fanatics don't have any more ammo (since anyone with "goxbux" can sell on CB for 3% under)
It's like we haven't had spread between exchanges for the entire history of bitcoin! It's like people are just discovering it now... I remember when BitFloor was a whole $5-$10 over Gox and no one was whining about "BitFloorBux" and how "BF price is fake!"
Then, it was a normal spread due to multiple factors. But when Gox is higher, it must be a fake price, cuz... Gox! A [not huge, but] significant portion of Gox memberbase CAN get their $$ out - the whales, and the folks with Japanese bank accounts. So I think the "Gox effect" is overstated.