Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 34072. (Read 26630516 times)

legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
mtgox   0.02   a few seconds ago   ^124.77
Along with 15 minutes of lag. Cutting edge systems!!!1
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1000
Mtgox trading engine lag: 16m 6s
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
On the one hand they claim this is a layer7 attack then they show this prolexic report, which is about layer 3-4. If they have an attack vector for an application layer attack why spend the resources for a expensive network layer attack?
It still smells fishy to me.

If nothing else they are shutting down their service when under attack to prevent "lag"
Which is the only responsible thing to do. A ddos attacked market racking up lag isn't a normal market. Thus the only responsible way to fight back is to turn off the market for the time being till the attack passes. At which point allow people to trade normally once again.

If this really is a layer7 attack it might be able to be sustained indefinitely. And what then?

Lol, you people need to stop trolling with Gox going down "indefinitely." This has happened like 20 times before, and its already back up. This is like, completely and utterly boring and normal.

That's why it's called back to normal in the bubble autonomy chart.
So 116.52 USD / BTC -> "Back to normal?" So what are we in, some sort of a reverse mojo bubble?
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
mtgox   0.02   a few seconds ago   ^124.77
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
On the one hand they claim this is a layer7 attack then they show this prolexic report, which is about layer 3-4. If they have an attack vector for an application layer attack why spend the resources for a expensive network layer attack?
It still smells fishy to me.

If nothing else they are shutting down their service when under attack to prevent "lag"
Which is the only responsible thing to do. A ddos attacked market racking up lag isn't a normal market. Thus the only responsible way to fight back is to turn off the market for the time being till the attack passes. At which point allow people to trade normally once again.

If this really is a layer7 attack it might be able to be sustained indefinitely. And what then?

Lol, you people need to stop trolling with Gox going down "indefinitely." This has happened like 20 times before, and its already back up. This is like, completely and utterly boring and normal.

That's why it's called back to normal in the bubble autonomy chart.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
On the one hand they claim this is a layer7 attack then they show this prolexic report, which is about layer 3-4. If they have an attack vector for an application layer attack why spend the resources for a expensive network layer attack?
It still smells fishy to me.

If nothing else they are shutting down their service when under attack to prevent "lag"
Which is the only responsible thing to do. A ddos attacked market racking up lag isn't a normal market. Thus the only responsible way to fight back is to turn off the market for the time being till the attack passes. At which point allow people to trade normally once again.

If this really is a layer7 attack it might be able to be sustained indefinitely. And what then?

Lol, you people need to stop trolling with Gox going down "indefinitely." This has happened like 20 times before, and its already back up. This is like, completely and utterly boring and normal.
newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
Clear your cache to see wonderful numbers [...]

You're right, thanks for the tip.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
On the one hand they claim this is a layer7 attack then they show this prolexic report, which is about layer 3-4. If they have an attack vector for an application layer attack why spend the resources for a expensive network layer attack?
It still smells fishy to me.

If nothing else they are shutting down their service when under attack to prevent "lag"
Which is the only responsible thing to do. A ddos attacked market racking up lag isn't a normal market. Thus the only responsible way to fight back is to turn off the market for the time being till the attack passes. At which point allow people to trade normally once again.

If this really is a layer7 attack it might be able to be sustained indefinitely. And what then?
full member
Activity: 128
Merit: 100
Interface is up for me. bitcoinity see gox and show 8 minutes lag without trading. Again.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
GOX TRADING ENGINE BACK. YEEHAW!

It is still "502 Bad Gateway" to me...
Clear your cache to see wonderful numbers:

Last price:$124.90000
High:$132.00000
Low:$117.86000
Volume:88053 BTC
Weighted Avg:$125.67729
Last Updated: 6 Minutes Ago
newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
GOX TRADING ENGINE BACK. YEEHAW!

It is still "502 Bad Gateway" to me...
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
GOX TRADING ENGINE BACK. YEEHAW!
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
Something happening at gox? Moody is outputting random stuff.
hero member
Activity: 628
Merit: 500
MtGox website: Database access error, please retry later

wtf?!
legendary
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
On the one hand they claim this is a layer7 attack then they show this prolexic report, which is about layer 3-4. If they have an attack vector for an application layer attack why spend the resources for a expensive network layer attack?
It still smells fishy to me.

If nothing else they are shutting down their service when under attack to prevent "lag"
Which is the only responsible thing to do. A ddos attacked market racking up lag isn't a normal market. Thus the only responsible way to fight back is to turn off the market for the time being till the attack passes. At which point allow people to trade normally once again.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
On the one hand they claim this is a layer7 attack then they show this prolexic report, which is about layer 3-4.
It still smells fishy to me.

Well, I doubt they are claiming today is April 11th.

Oh, in that case, pretty solid arguing folks!  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
On the one hand they claim this is a layer7 attack then they show this prolexic report, which is about layer 3-4. If they have an attack vector for an application layer attack why spend the resources for a expensive network layer attack?
It still smells fishy to me.

If nothing else they are shutting down their service when under attack to prevent "lag"
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100


Nah this is totally a shoop. CONSPIRACY!!!

I have an idea! Why doesn't Gox publish the destination IPs on twitter, so we can all point LOIC at it? (disclaimer I'm a complete DDoS newb and i'm sure there's some reason that 'firing back' doesn't work.)

(Forum etiquette - quote pruning pro-tip - prune large images in quoted replies by throwing in a height= width= into the [img] tag, make people's scroll fingers happy Grin)
Because its a Ddos and thus is distributed so there is not one single IP to point it to?
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1028
Duelbits.com
should we get worried, this looks more serious than ddos
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250


Nah this is totally a shoop. CONSPIRACY!!! Prolexic isn't even a real company, Gox just made them up.

(In seriousness: They're learning a thing or two about transparency. They should release this third-party event report (along with a way to verify it via the third party) after each and every single claimed DDoS event.)

I have an idea! Why doesn't Gox publish the source IPs on twitter, so we can all point LOIC at them? (disclaimer I'm a complete DDoS newb and i'm sure there's some reason that 'firing back' doesn't work, so this is probably a stupid idea Wink.)

(Forum etiquette - quote pruning pro-tip - prune large images in quoted replies by throwing in a height= width= into the [img] tag, make people's scroll fingers happy Grin)
Jump to: