Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 34075. (Read 26623626 times)
April 21, 2013, 07:45:23 AM
I think we can post whatever we want here. I haven't seen any posts deleted and OP said that it isn't actually being moderated.
April 21, 2013, 07:39:01 AM
April 21, 2013, 07:22:28 AM
stick to the point please guys...
April 21, 2013, 07:06:04 AM
It's because people want some substance too. It's obvious people want one wall observer thread that is both serious but also has room for some fun and comic relief in between. The last thread was perfect imo, don't know why the TS wanted to change that. 
This so much. +aloti want my wallobserver back
OT: we are still at 125, going up
April 21, 2013, 06:51:15 AM
The spirit of the Wall Observer cannot be quenched. I feel we are entering an interesting new age, gentlemen.
April 21, 2013, 06:45:31 AM
i will break silence now and proclaim the:
Wall Observer - MtGoxUSD wall movement tracker - United
because:
Wall Observer - MtGoxUSD wall movement tracker - United
because:
April 21, 2013, 06:41:13 AM
you do know a while back adam posted saying, to paraphrase, "ah screw it." effectively saying to go at it as we wish, in this thread? please don't make me search it.
you are right: (also) i found this
sorry for all the confusion guys.
i will not be deleting any posts here
this is just the new thread because the old was was just too big.
i will not be deleting any posts here
this is just the new thread because the old was was just too big.
April 21, 2013, 06:38:31 AM
i think the wallobserver-fork is a pity...
i miss the other guys, it got so quiet in here.
i miss the other guys, it got so quiet in here.
I'm here, it's just that I have nothing to say that would adhere to the rules. There can only be one wall observer thread and it seems people decided to go with the more restricted one.
Strange.
i think its just delivering more information on the status quo.
while the old one was both: fun AND informative (everybody loved the old one)
the softcore-thread focused to much on its opposing role and didnt actually deliver the
spirit of the original, which is why people rather choose strict information - which is atleast its main purpose - over funny posts
also regarding the restrictions, i had the feeling they got loose...
anyway:
adam you should unite our brothers now and make a statement
... pleaseHow about renaming: Wall Observer - MtGoxUSD wall movement tracker UNITED
and letting the new restrictions aside?
PS: the fact that people discuss this issue in a thread where nothing else than marketmovements should be discussed is rather ironic.
April 21, 2013, 06:34:16 AM
you do know a while back adam posted saying, to paraphrase, "ah screw it." effectively saying to go at it as we wish, in this thread? please don't make me search it.
April 21, 2013, 06:30:18 AM
It's because people want some substance too. It's obvious people want one wall observer thread that is both serious but also has room for some fun and comic relief in between. The last thread was perfect imo, don't know why the TS wanted to change that.
April 21, 2013, 06:20:03 AM
i think the wallobserver-fork is a pity...
i miss the other guys, it got so quiet in here.
i miss the other guys, it got so quiet in here.
I'm here, it's just that I have nothing to say that would adhere to the rules. There can only be one wall observer thread and it seems people decided to go with the more restricted one.
Strange.
I think they are just used to having unenforced bullshit laws on the books. That makes this thread feel more homey. I could be wrong, of course.
April 21, 2013, 06:05:59 AM
i think the wallobserver-fork is a pity...
i miss the other guys, it got so quiet in here.
i miss the other guys, it got so quiet in here.
I'm here, it's just that I have nothing to say that would adhere to the rules. There can only be one wall observer thread and it seems people decided to go with the more restricted one.
Strange.
April 21, 2013, 05:18:53 AM
Are narcissists allowed to go on the joke thread?
Sorry.
The brag part was bordering off-topic. 
April 21, 2013, 05:13:20 AM
Are narcissists allowed to go on the joke thread?
April 21, 2013, 04:47:31 AM
You do realize that you are in a community where any service operator who can't achieve more than 99.999% uptime will get crucified on the cross of shame and be spitted on? 
Geeks don't give a damn about your fancy order-matching idea, and how a real world exchange should operate, if you dare to entertain with the idea of an exchange not having to process orders real-time every second 24*7, you will get strapped of your badge of nerdiness and ostracized forever. 
Geeks don't give a damn about your fancy order-matching idea, and how a real world exchange should operate, if you dare to entertain with the idea of an exchange not having to process orders real-time every second 24*7, you will get strapped of your badge of nerdiness and ostracized forever. The world does not need authoritative bitcoin prices any more than every 8 hours. This is more than 1000 times per year, ff'ss! (I may be wrong, since 640k indeed was not enough to contain the blockchain!)
There will be no real time exchange in my system at all. For that, you will need to visit the casinos, where I will continue to play with my BTC1,000 playstash whenever I feel like, as do all my friends, enriching themselves in expense of the sheep. Not that I needed to be enriched any more, or even that the shearing of the sheep was fun, but all this is required to keep the buzz on Bitcoin going. Expect more scandals!
I have already taken measures, how to survive the coming ostracision. I only need to take 76% of the network with me. If you want to join my Bitcoin shadow devteam, drop a PM!
April 21, 2013, 04:31:26 AM
Must read, clarifies your thoughts on the price (3 min only).
The "double auction" method described, is the way I also would solve the fiat/BTC problem. Coupled with a Dealer Network, where only the members have access to the auction, and the general public either buys from them OTC or uses the real-time exchanges, which are relegated to a marginal "casino" role, where the bulls and bears both win, only sheep get slaughtered.
Long term transfer of coin-denominated wealth would go the route of "large private holds -> Dealer Network (most of these by design have large holds themselves and may therefore easily unload their own holdings) -> paper wallets of the new adopters".
The "double auction" method described, is the way I also would solve the fiat/BTC problem. Coupled with a Dealer Network, where only the members have access to the auction, and the general public either buys from them OTC or uses the real-time exchanges, which are relegated to a marginal "casino" role, where the bulls and bears both win, only sheep get slaughtered.
Long term transfer of coin-denominated wealth would go the route of "large private holds -> Dealer Network (most of these by design have large holds themselves and may therefore easily unload their own holdings) -> paper wallets of the new adopters".
You do realize that you are in a community where any service operator who can't achieve more than 99.999% uptime will get crucified on the cross of shame and be spitted on?
Geeks don't give a damn about your fancy order-matching idea, and how a real world exchange should operate, if you dare to entertain with the idea of an exchange not having to process orders real-time every second 24*7, you will get strapped of your badge of nerdiness and ostracized forever. April 21, 2013, 03:50:43 AM
120 wall broken... will it bounce ?
someone did a big short ...
it has to come back some time April 21, 2013, 03:48:56 AM
Must read, clarifies your thoughts on the price (3 min only).
The "double auction" method described, is the way I also would solve the fiat/BTC problem. Coupled with a Dealer Network, where only the members have access to the auction, and the general public either buys from them OTC or uses the real-time exchanges, which are relegated to a marginal "casino" role, where the bulls and bears both win, only sheep get slaughtered.
Long term transfer of coin-denominated wealth would go the route of "large private holds -> Dealer Network (most of these by design have large holds themselves and may therefore easily unload their own holdings) -> paper wallets of the new adopters".
The "double auction" method described, is the way I also would solve the fiat/BTC problem. Coupled with a Dealer Network, where only the members have access to the auction, and the general public either buys from them OTC or uses the real-time exchanges, which are relegated to a marginal "casino" role, where the bulls and bears both win, only sheep get slaughtered.
Long term transfer of coin-denominated wealth would go the route of "large private holds -> Dealer Network (most of these by design have large holds themselves and may therefore easily unload their own holdings) -> paper wallets of the new adopters".
April 21, 2013, 03:39:59 AM
120 wall broken... will it bounce ?
April 21, 2013, 03:39:35 AM
Big dump. But a 1k buy order got put for about 1 second right at the top then immediately pulled
Jump to: