Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 3441. (Read 26713152 times)

legendary
Activity: 2050
Merit: 1184
Never selling
not too far from 200WMA now.

Mfers here laughed at me when I said that BTC will touch 200 WMA back in Feb.

I know. Don't take it personally, nobody likes predictions like that.

Question is, when your target is reached will you buy?
copper member
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1651
Bitcoin Bottom was at $15.4k
not too far from 200WMA now.

Mfers here laughed at me when I said that BTC will touch 200 WMA back in Feb.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 2050
Merit: 1184
Never selling
not too far from 200WMA now.

Mempool backed up a bit too.

Nasdaq futures almost down 3%. 2.7 at the moment

EDIT: futures now down 3.5%
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 5874
light_warrior ... 🕯️
[...]
So many questions that make my head spin.

Just recently Celsius withdrew 225k ETH from the Anchor protocol, so these losses are nothing compared to how much money they managed to save in the run-up to Tera's crash.. As far as bitcoin is concerned... I am very optimistic, at the very least, that the current decline will be an opportunity for me to buy more.
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1265
There’s a lot to be pessimistic about right now in the Bitcoin market. First the UST disaster, now it seems Celsius is the next domino to fall. How far will that spread? There are rumors that Tether was invested into Celsius. Were other interest providing exchanges also exposed? Will the market be heavily dumped until these companies can afford to buy back their customer deposits? Will that trigger Saylor to sell? What about when the ETH 2.0 coins are unlocked and the mtgox coins hit the market? I’ve been saying $10K is in the near future, but seeing it play out is going to be painful.

With all new technologies you always get the good and bad.
Networks failing is a good thing because it will make people look at the fundamentals.
It will cull the bad from the good. Stop the supply of new shitcoins.
Exchanges will become responsible for the coins they choose to list. They have to protect their customers and their own image...

Eth2.0 will cut supply by 90% which will add to scarcity and increase price.

MtGox coins will get absorbed by the big whales like Microstrategy if they push down the price.

Bitcoin has always been hard love. But those who just ride through the storm will find their rainbow with pot of gold.
legendary
Activity: 2050
Merit: 1184
Never selling
There’s a lot to be pessimistic about right now in the Bitcoin market. First the UST disaster, now it seems Celsius is the next domino to fall. How far will that spread? There are rumors that Tether was invested into Celsius. Were other interest providing exchanges also exposed? Will the market be heavily dumped until these companies can afford to buy back their customer deposits? Will that trigger Saylor to sell? What about when the ETH 2.0 coins are unlocked and the mtgox coins hit the market? I’ve been saying $10K is in the near future, but seeing it play out is going to be painful.

Tether FUD again, it will never end.

Things certainly look bad, but that is usually when things turn around. So we'll see how it goes over the coming weeks. Not gonna lie 10k would be upsetting to me.
legendary
Activity: 3962
Merit: 11519
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
Right now 40k at 2024 doesn't seem too bad honestly, lol.

Probably about right, always a long grind between cycle bottoms & tops. $250,000 by end of 2025!

remind me to sell some during 2025 at 250K, or maybe even 190K,  Wink

I might have to revise my UPpity numbers at some point.. even though---at this point that I am typing this post, my UPpity numbers are not seeming as immediately relevant.. .. especially since within the past 8 minutes as I am about to hit "post", we just touched $24,745 as our new local low.
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
There’s a lot to be pessimistic about right now in the Bitcoin market. First the UST disaster, now it seems Celsius is the next domino to fall. How far will that spread? There are rumors that Tether was invested into Celsius. Were other interest providing exchanges also exposed? Will the market be heavily dumped until these companies can afford to buy back their customer deposits? Will that trigger Saylor to sell? What about when the ETH 2.0 coins are unlocked and the mtgox coins hit the market? I’ve been saying $10K is in the near future, but seeing it play out is going to be painful.
legendary
Activity: 2050
Merit: 1184
Never selling
Adjusted for the dollar’s real-world loss of value, I think that BTC must now be well below its December 2017 peak (never mind 200 WMA).  What goods and services could $19k buy in December 2017?  What goods and services can $28.5k buy now?

It's disingenuous to argue BTC price from its December 2017 top.

Get a grip.

Say what?  Disingenuous?  That is a rather pungent word, even if you disagree with me.  Whom do you allege I am misleading, and to what end?

There is a common belief that BTC can never dip below its previous 4-year cycle high.  Comparisons of a subsequent crash price to the previous cycle top are not my invention, as you no doubt are aware.

If such a crossing of the previous cycle top has occurred in real-value terms—not the silly mental habit of measuring all value in dollars—then that is a significant datum not only about Bitcoin, but also about the state of the financial markets generally.

There might be times in which starting from the top makes sense, but not the way that you framed the matter in your earlier post, which you had also made a similar point earlier.. No need to argue about it.. because it sounds like we disagree and I already made my point.. even though you are bringing up a new point, in your later response.

So they froze the chain?

the coin was like 8 bucks in june 2021 cap 2 bil

then 4.37 in dec 2021. 837 mil cap

then 2.13 in april 2022  544 mil cap


then 79 cents in may 2022 182 mil cap

now 25 cents in june 2022 64 mil cap

That is their shitcoin that you could get interest payouts in rather than the coin you lent to them.

What is happening with all the BTC and shitcoins people had on their platforming earning interest and how many of those coins were there. That's what I would like to know. If they sold 95m worth of BTC, who's BTC was it? theirs or their clients? Since the interest rates for BTC were always crap I figured that most of the client funds would of been in stable coins.

Lots of questions around these guys.

Weren't you using their service or some similar service (about a year or two ago) and then you came into this thread and told us that we were all dummies if we weren't earning interest on our bitcoins?

Never used it, just said it was an option for generating yield on your BTC. I would rather wait for banks with their government/Fed guarantees for something like that but even then I probably wouldn't do it because the rates would be shit.

I was selling OTM call options, and unfortunately that has been going well. I say unfortunately because the very easy money made on that has been possible because the BTC price has been decreasing for so long. Also was only doing that on like 2% of my total holdings. holding off on that for the moment because I think strong up spikes are possible now with the amount of negative sentiment we have.

Playing the spread on futures and spot was the other option but that is a no goer trade at the moment. Never did that either.
legendary
Activity: 3962
Merit: 11519
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
Adjusted for the dollar’s real-world loss of value, I think that BTC must now be well below its December 2017 peak (never mind 200 WMA).  What goods and services could $19k buy in December 2017?  What goods and services can $28.5k buy now?

It's disingenuous to argue BTC price from its December 2017 top.

Get a grip.

Say what?  Disingenuous?  That is a rather pungent word, even if you disagree with me.  Whom do you allege I am misleading, and to what end?

There is a common belief that BTC can never dip below its previous 4-year cycle high.  Comparisons of a subsequent crash price to the previous cycle top are not my invention, as you no doubt are aware.

If such a crossing of the previous cycle top has occurred in real-value terms—not the silly mental habit of measuring all value in dollars—then that is a significant datum not only about Bitcoin, but also about the state of the financial markets generally.

There might be times in which starting from the top makes sense, but not the way that you framed the matter in your earlier post, which you had also made a similar point earlier.. No need to argue about it.. because it sounds like we disagree and I already made my point.. even though you are bringing up a new point, in your later response.

So they froze the chain?

the coin was like 8 bucks in june 2021 cap 2 bil

then 4.37 in dec 2021. 837 mil cap

then 2.13 in april 2022  544 mil cap


then 79 cents in may 2022 182 mil cap

now 25 cents in june 2022 64 mil cap

That is their shitcoin that you could get interest payouts in rather than the coin you lent to them.

What is happening with all the BTC and shitcoins people had on their platforming earning interest and how many of those coins were there. That's what I would like to know. If they sold 95m worth of BTC, who's BTC was it? theirs or their clients? Since the interest rates for BTC were always crap I figured that most of the client funds would of been in stable coins.

Lots of questions around these guys.

Weren't you using their service or some similar service (about a year or two ago) and then you came into this thread and told us that we were all dummies if we weren't earning interest on our bitcoins?
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1265
Hey, at that—newbies who are scared that we just dipped below $25k (now bouncing towards $26k), and that there is chit-chat about $22k, should remember that some people sold Bitcoin for under $220 in early 2015.  No, I did not omit any zeroes, or turn any letter-k to a zero.  I wonder if the people who sold BTC at $220 feel bad now. Smiley

selling at $220 was not frown at for most of 2015.
It depends what did you sell it for.


At that point most sales would of been because BTC is dead.

srsly? hardly, imho.


I remember this thread being a desert. A lot of people had given up.

maybe, but mining threads were as active as ever, maybe much more than today 'cause many people were mining with S7.
I think it was the last tolerable miner as far as noise at home is concerned (S9 and later had to go to a basement, a different structure or to a separate facility).

Majority or users (even back then) were not miners though.

Higher lows look like a promising reversal  Smiley

100k next week

1M next month  Grin
legendary
Activity: 2050
Merit: 1184
Never selling
Hey, at that—newbies who are scared that we just dipped below $25k (now bouncing towards $26k), and that there is chit-chat about $22k, should remember that some people sold Bitcoin for under $220 in early 2015.  No, I did not omit any zeroes, or turn any letter-k to a zero.  I wonder if the people who sold BTC at $220 feel bad now. Smiley

selling at $220 was not frown at for most of 2015.
It depends what did you sell it for.


At that point most sales would of been because BTC is dead.

srsly? hardly, imho.


I remember this thread being a desert. A lot of people had given up.

maybe, but mining threads were as active as ever, maybe much more than today 'cause many people were mining with S7.
I think it was the last tolerable miner as far as noise at home is concerned (S9 and later had to go to a basement, a different structure or to a separate facility).

Majority or users (even back then) were not miners though.

Higher lows look like a promising reversal  Smiley

100k next week
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1265
Higher lows look like a promising reversal  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2744
Merit: 13647
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
Co joining with this GYM thing
legendary
Activity: 3620
Merit: 4813
It will bounce when U.S spot ETF will be approved in a couple of weeks i guess.

Forget about retail they are broke ore lost a lot of money with shitcoins and lost trust in this market. They are struggling paying life expenses due to high inflation anyway.

They will FOMO when corn hits $150k pushing it to $200k+ but then institutional/hedge funds sharks will dump on them AGAIN, like it always goes.

Going to the gym, have a nice day!
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 4597
Hey, at that—newbies who are scared that we just dipped below $25k (now bouncing towards $26k), and that there is chit-chat about $22k, should remember that some people sold Bitcoin for under $220 in early 2015.  No, I did not omit any zeroes, or turn any letter-k to a zero.  I wonder if the people who sold BTC at $220 feel bad now. Smiley

selling at $220 was not frown at for most of 2015.
It depends what did you sell it for.


At that point most sales would of been because BTC is dead.

srsly? hardly, imho.


I remember this thread being a desert. A lot of people had given up.

maybe, but mining threads were as active as ever, maybe much more than today 'cause many people were mining with S7.
I think it was the last tolerable miner as far as noise at home is concerned (S9 and later had to go to a basement, a different structure or to a separate facility).
legendary
Activity: 3962
Merit: 11519
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
It is the sideeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeways I fear the most... that is the worst of the worst.

+1 Sideways sucks the most

Dunno, for traders maybe yes. For hodlers, down is most painful...  Cool

“Sideways” means low volatility; the extreme of sideways-ness is price stability.

The theoretically ideal form of money is price-stable.  Volatility only benefits traders, at the expense of everyone else.

There are several kinds of traders.  some influence, some panic, some play big swings, etc, etc

All of those require price movements.  Not price stability.

Ok?  and?  What's your point?  Another point is that trading is not a zero sum game, it can help in a lot of ways including price discovery, provides liquidity, allows for the creation of more financial tools which thereby motivates larger and larger players to get into the space.

I am trying to describe what is... and you were trying to denigrate trading and traders... but then in one of your other post you were suggesting that we all need to spend our bitcoins... Do you even know how some of those practices and preferences (or lack of preferences in your case) for various systems overlap?



Profitable trading definitionally requires “buy low, sell high” (same for shorts in the reverse order).  I think that mathematically, the only way to profit from “buying low, selling high” when the price sits still is to exploit some kind of a spread—either intra-market (market maker), or inter-market (arbitrage).  Those types of traders attempt to minimize the relevance of price volatility to themselves—in the extreme case, executing (or attempting to execute) risk-free trades with no exposure to price movements.  Others need volatility, for even a unidirectional price movement cannot bring them profit:  If the price only goes forever up to infinity, or forever down until it hits zero, then the only way to profit without leaving money on the table is “buy and hold” (or short and never cover), not actively to trade.

We already know bitcoin is volatile.. so een you seem ot be recognizing that bitcoin provides a decent space for trading... that is if you want to trade.  

Of course trading is optional.. some people do it an others don't.  Seems like a vast majority of traders end up losing, and so in bitcoin, there are a lot more options for amateurs to learn how to trade (and probably lose when they do it, unless they error on the side of accumulating their lil precious... but sure there are a variety of ways to engage in trading too. as I already mentioned.. and likely no need to go into details, except to acknowledge that it exists and that it is likely not a zero sum game and people have choices how much to engage in trading and how to do it, if they do end up doing it.


If BTC could become price-stable,* then I would prefer that.  The world cannot run on volatile money alone, nor on deflationary money alone.  (Note to Jay:  I am perfectly well aware that price-stable BTC will never happen.)

 I doubt that it is good to be using the word "never" to the extent that it matters anyhow.  We already should be able to anticipate that the larger the BTC market cap gets, the more likelihood for it to be less voilatile because the BIGGER the market cap, it takes more value to move it.


That’s a rather simplistic monetary theory.  I am under no illusions about a hardcapped currency with a static supply ever becoming price-stable.

It seems that I already addressed this in regards to presumptions that we might have and then also in terms of how far we might project out our planning in accordance with our presumptions.  How much does it matter whether we might be correct at this time about something that might happen 150 years into the future?



* I mean price-stable according to an index of goods and services.  That means rising against the dollar, as the dollar depreciates from inflation.  The dollar is not price-stable; to the contrary, the dollar is a volatile currency.  Have you seen dollar prices lately!?  Not only the obvious increase in prices, but the fluctuations as markets adapt to price shocks.

You are a fucking goofball, sometimes.  The dollar has had a pretty long stead of having quite a bit of stability (aka mostly lacking in terms of experiencing a lot volatility) .. of course, the dollar has been depreciating in at a very slow rate .. but it is not volatile.. and for sure, one of the concerns in recent times, is that its decline has started to increase in ways that are really difficult to hide  and bordering on points of unsustainability - it's been a good run.. while it lasted..  but at the same time, the dollar is not dead yet... it is the strongest of the fiats, currently.  There are possibilities to continue to milk the system another 5-30 years.. I am not sure if it can last that long, but the dollar is not dead yet... and we are lucky to have this life raft called bitcoin (I did not come up with such life raft term.. but many bitcoiners have been using such analogy)

I monitor street prices in dollars of some various real-world goods and services.  The kinds that ordinary people would need to buy on a regular basis.  Mass-market stuff, nothing obscure or having a niche market.

And?  Relevance?

What does that get you?


In the past six months, I have seen up-and-down swings of 10%, 30%, in the extreme case even 50% in apples-to-apples comparisons of the exact same SKU, etc., with the general price trend being up.

“Price stability” means that ordinary people with ordinary needs can draw budgets of weekly, monthly, etc. expenditures based on more or less accurate predictions of how much things will cost.

Yes .. we live in interesting times, currently... for sure.  I doubt that your street surveys are doing you much if any better than other persons who are observing these kinds of inflation matters in their own lives.


If swings of 30–50% swings constitute “stability” in your book, who is the goofball?

It appears that you are reacting to my "goofball" reference.. hahahahaha  You're no fun.. but already knew that.   Tongue Tongue Tongue

A lot of us who have been investing in bitcoin by buying, accumulating and HODLing in the neighborhood of one cycle (referring to each cycle as 4 years-ish) or longer have likely profited quite stupendously in terms of our decision(s) to hedge with bitcoin, and likely the more aggressive ones had benefited more than others who were less aggressive.  Surely there may well be some folks in the fiat world who had been able to hedge decently well with their investments in certain stocks an d perhaps property investments, but as an asset class that has been generally open and available to anyone - even with lower level budgets, those who have chosen to invest decently aggressively in bitcoin including buying, accumulating and hodling.. have done decently well, relatively speaking.

Trading and fucking around with margin can end up being another story that likely would have left those involved in bitcoin with potentially shitty positions, and many of the more regular guys that participate in this thread do not recommend fucking around with very much trading or playing around with margin unless its a relatively small part of their BTC holdings.. so there is a kind of seemingly widespread practice that most of us here tend to emphasize buying accumulating and holding rather than trading or fucking around with margin...

So then the level of comfort that some of us regular WO members might have in regards to our bitcoin position might mostly have to do with how long we have been into bitcoin rather than other factors.. Of course, some folks might have had better cashflows than others to start with or some might have been able to transfer more value into bitcoin from the start of their investing into bitcoin, but those guys might be older too.. I surely cannot speak for the specific situations of too many others.. just to get some ideas of the variance that does exist with various regular participants in this thread.

But if you want to suggest that my Bitcoin position might have some goofball tendencies, then you might need to point that out a wee bit moar better in term  of specifics in terms of "what you talkin bout Willis?"


Zooming out, the dollar has been depreciating rapidly since the Nixon Shock.  Look at a chart.  Only by the standards of what some people deride as a “third-world country” could the U.S. dollar be considered to have had slow depreciation.  Only with very short-term thinking could it be considered to have had “a good run”.

Ok?  So what are we arguing about?  I al ready made my various points, and you are not really raising anything new or contrary to my points at this time.



Newsflash:  INFLATION IS HIGH.*  Surprise!  Reaction:  SELL THE DEFLATIONARY CURRENCY, TO BUY THE INFLATIONARY CURRENCY!

Makes sense.  To the average “Bitcoin investor” nowadays.

This is the least problem with letting people think of Bitcoin as sort of like a stock.


* Assuredly much higher than the heavily manipulated CPI numbers show.  What kind of an idiot believes the CPI numbers?  The kind who reacts to high dollar inflation by spending more money (BTC) to buy dollars.

Hm?  Your note goes to show that perhaps you  do understand Gresham's law?

I understand Gresham’s Law perfectly well.  Indeed, I even understand that it applies to currencies—not to stocks or to anything that can be treated like a stock.

There you go with your hyperbole, again.. "perfectly well," right?   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

It seemed at one point you were making arguments that fail and refuse to account for Greshams law.. when you are trying to suggest that we need to spend our bitcoins blah blah blah.

Gresham's law can apply to anything of value, and of course, if something is not liquid then it is difficult to spend... but merely because something is more liquid than something else does not cause us to have to spend the more liquid good/currency first.

For example, you know as well as me that with bitcoin, there could be circumstances in which some of us might hold our bitcoins in a very difficult to liquidate kind of way.. and if we are projecting out our cashflows, we might realize that we might need to sell some of our bitcoin in order to make sure that we can cover our various expenses... so in that regard, we may well be considering in advance what kinds of assets/currencies we hold and which ones we might want to convert into a more liquid form - including our considering Gresham Law ideas during such thought process about what to do and how to hold assets/currencies and how much to hold in each category..


I began before to write a long reply to your earlier long reply re the stock issue.  No time for that now; I think that anyway, I have clearly explained why treating Bitcoin as “like a stock” is a horrible idea.  

We have made our points regarding this, and it seems to me that you are creating a false dichotomy.. and I already told yhou to do what you like, even if you seem to be arguing with yourself in terms of baloney premises in tterms of the way you framed the question.


If you disagree, please don’t argue with me:  Take it up with the SEC.

That's a way to get out of it.. hahahah..

NOt that I want to talk about it anyway.. you are the one who seems to have a hard-on for that fantasy framing of the matter...


They’ve been cracking down on stock-like things that people try to call “ICOs”, “DAO governance tokens”, or “NFTs”; I’m sure they’d love to bite into a stock-like thing called “Bitcoin”, if they see people treating it as “like a stock”.  Needless to say, I think that is ridiculous:  Bitcoin is nothing whatsoever like a stock.

Oh?  That explanation helps....




not.




 Tongue Tongue

I'm seeing Nasdaq futures down 1.8% right now. Interesting week coming up.

well yeah i do suppose screaming towards the ground at mach 15 is "interesting," in a weird hypnotic kinda way.

Don't faint.. You might mess up your nail polish.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 320
Take profit in BTC. Account PnL in BTC. BTC=money.
Hey, at that—newbies who are scared that we just dipped below $25k (now bouncing towards $26k), and that there is chit-chat about $22k, should remember that some people sold Bitcoin for under $220 in early 2015.  No, I did not omit any zeroes, or turn any letter-k to a zero.  I wonder if the people who sold BTC at $220 feel bad now. Smiley

selling at $220 was not frown at for most of 2015.
It depends what did you sell it for.


At that point most sales would of been because BTC is dead.

Bitcoin wasn’t dead.  It was merely expressing its divine displeasure at Hearn/XT.  (Not-early 2015.)

Fork Wars caused crashes in 2015 and 2018.  Thinking about POS, and Evil Hat(TM) economic attacks...


A lot of people had given up.

I guess it was nice of them to give their coins to you.
Jump to: