Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 3498. (Read 26713514 times)

someone needs to cut a piece off buddy and graft a number 3

ie change 29k to 39k

Explanation

I think that he is now employable in Hollywood again.
Maybe not with all directors, but certainly most.
It's probably worth more than anything else.
I am glad that there is some sense still out there and you cannot win by just crying.
I only watched a few of youtube snippets, but it seemed to be enough.

still bullish on bitcoin...we shall go to that 38-42K, then see.

Explanation

Very true, I really don't think he cared about the money at all throughout this whole thing. AH to declare bankruptcy soonTM;

15 to 2

reduced  to 10 to 2

My wife and I watched a lot.

I wanted more like 25 mill to 1 mill or 25 to 1

but they clearly sided with Depp.

If she appeals he can simply say rather than disgrace the true why me women in the world I will do no contest on the appeal give her the 2 mill and donate 7 mill to the 2 charities she stiffed along with giving 3 mill to real women victims of abuse.

Amber is pretty much dead to the world and should crawl into her hell hole and shut the f up.

fini bitch.

Explanation

Good old days when you had to use a hexagonal pencil to roll them backwards.

(disclaimer: it was safer then than the automatic rewind...     )    

Whoops...  (I don’t do TA, but I do know real astrology.  Or at least, I write stories about it.)

---

Explanation

Is it worth putting death_wish on ignore? Asking for a friend...

If I were Satoshi, and I wanted to claim my old identity, then I would start by doing what Craig Wright doesn’t:  Sign a suitable message with Satoshi’s PGP key or one of his known Bitcoin keys, and give you a copy that you can verify yourself.

If I knew Satoshi, then I probably wouldn’t brag about it in a totally unsupported, unevidenced way—right after publicly humiliating myself about how I lost most of my bitcoins.

Those are dangerous claims to make.  Any unknown party who makes those types of claims should be, to put it delicately, approached with some extra vigilance.  Objectively, if this discussion didn’t involve me, then your question would have me thinking quietly to myself, What’s the next move?  Where’s the scam?  I want to make it clear that I didn’t say that, I didn’t claim that, I didn’t imply anything to suggest it—looking back at my prior post, I don’t know why you asked it.

I won’t deny it, either:  I really do not answer these types of questions about my identity and personal history.  If you were to ask me if I am Napoleon Bonaparte, or if I knew Napoleon—maybe I chatted with him on IRC; or perhaps I’m Talleyrand (no, nullius was Talleyrand; nullius was definitely Talleyrand, which means that Lauda was Napoleon!)—then I would give you a similar type of response.

Beyond that, of course, I am Satoshi:  “We are all Satoshi.”

---

This brings to mind a new smart-contract chain I won’t name here, which is now being pumped with much fanfare.  Its founders tout how they’ve been working on cryptographic money since long before Bitcoin.  They say that as if it’s something to brag about—as if it gives them some sort of senior priority over Bitcoin.  They are evidently too foolish to realize that it is a self-indictment:  You had failed projects, vaporware, or mere theories, while Satoshi built something that worked.

Having known about cryptographic money since before Bitcoin doesn’t make one terribly special, in itself.  Many people were interested in this—some with intense active interest; others with casual curiosity.  Satoshi didn’t invent the concept:  He fulfilled a widespread need.  He made a dream come true.

It does give me a different perspective.  A view than the meme crowd could not even imagine, much less people who just bought into Bitcoin in search of dollar-profits.  n00bs, get off my lawn!

---

Of course—obviously—in one specific instance.  But I wouldn’t bother with mentioning it, if the statement were not more widely applicable.  It is a general problem.  Unfortunately, types like that are a dime a dozen in “crypto”-land.

And it was a mighty fine year! (What I remember of it anyway)

Fucken' ey...... 

https://youtu.be/R0uWF-37DAM

The talent of Chris, was , off the chart. RIP buddy.

I am not as fond of Cruz, although he is smart.
It was readily visible when he was debating Beto last time.
I like his bitcoin views, though, as dems bitcoin policies were a huge turn-off lately.

As far as politics, Houston and DFW are probably canceling each other rn.

Off-topic but I was rooting for him to beat Trump in 2016, who knows what the world would have looked like..

OK.  I missed my chance.  I was going to point out early this morning that this price action is very likely to be a rally in a bear market, and MAYBE a bear market bottom. 

ALTHOUGH we will need to see uppity (as one wordy man calls it) with VOLUME eventually.  We did NOT see it this time, for example.

But on the flip side this debart also does NOT have the volume that would favor a bear.

That said... if we keep knocking on the floor, eventually we are gonna break it.

Cruz is one of the most intelligent lawyers in congress.  He is my senator, and I have voted for him for years.  He figured out how Bitcoin would be a positive for (green) energy.

In the MIDDLE of the Covid debacle he filmed himself going to businesses that were suffering to support them, like a hair stylist.  This was the make the point that we should let the free market do it's thing and let people take the risks they want to and are comfortable with.

So having known him for a decade I am COMPLETELY NOT surprised that he gets bitcoin on a very deep level.  He also seems to be a bit of a maxi.  He does not talk a lot about "blockchain" or "defi" or whatever.

He is America's version of Bukele, I think.  Even better, in my opinion than Lummis.  Perhaps Lummis gets it on the same level, but Cruz communicates that well.

So all you lefty grumps can kiss my hind.  I am super proud of my Senator and will keep voting for him.  And I am NOT a right winger... I want people in government that want government to have LESS POWER.  He is one of them.  His love for Bitcoin PROVES that in my opinion.  I would vote for any democrat that shared that view.  (Tulsi Gabbard?)

That video was edited by an idiot.