Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 3641. (Read 26608013 times)

Explanation

Explanation

Whoaza......  

I had to do a double take to make sure that I was in the correct thread.





hahahahaha

suchmoon - gets it.

 


You are going to go far in this thread by ridiculing the concept of bitcoin maximalism.  

Fame and fortune anticipated...


not.



That is be called Koreck.

Why would we listen to you, punk?


 




#nohomo




Even if true.. and even if you might be delicate or pregnant.. you are not going to get any special treatment around here, even if you happen to be a girl...   think about it.

And furthermore.... , haven't you heard that >>>>>>on the internet, no one knows that you are a cat/dog (or whatever).<<<<<<

Explanation

Oh gawd... you truly have proven your "stalker" credentials.  #nohomo


When the facts are put to my face, I can see what a distracted person I happen to be.  Really sucks having A.D.D... if that might be my excuse.



Try to do this to Bawb...

hahahahahaha


I don't delete any posts, so really I do not mind letting the chips fall where they will, even though there can be some scariness in terms of what you had shown can be done within a relatively short period of time.... and I am assuming that you do not even work for any kind of chain analytics firm.  

Just imagine if there are companies or individuals who are spending 24/7 for months and months digging up dirt and striving to put together some kind of a case..... No wonder members delete some of their posts.... Has not been my practice to delete posts (and I do not plan to change), but you can see how some of the analysis can get scary, and probably one of the reasons that Theymos had disabled the member statistics functions within the forum...

I am almost ready to make a joke with a certain question, but I have decided to refrain.. which my thinking of the joke had caused me to consider another joke.  

Do you think that your analysis can either figure out what I am thinking at the various times of my forum posts or diagnose me with some kind of a condition?  In part, I am asking because over the years, there have been a few occasions in which forum members had claimed that they know what condition I have (assuming that I have some kind of a condition), which presumably they have figure out through my forum posts... hahahahaha..

In response to those kinds of situations (accusations), frequently I will tell such member(s) to go fuck themselves (even though I might not use those exact words).. or I might just avoid the topic or change the subject, which I consider to be similarly effective towards telling a member to go fuck themselves, but saying it in a silent - and more passive-aggressive way.

Explanation

Explanation

the evening wall report

improving across timeframes right now..look same'ish...not bad

support continuing to improve...$42.9k seems to be next resistance of note
make bells for all ahead half...watch the swell


dyor


4h


D

stronghands

Of course, I find the whole matter a bit surprising.  

In my own defense, I will assert that I believe that I have a pretty strong tendency to either quote the actual text of other members (when I am responding)... but I am surprised that the estimated number of words adds up to nearly 5x my ballpark estimated words per post.   So I estimated myself to have around 50 - 100 words per post, but your analysis shows that I had around 353 words per post (of course, including whatever text I had chosen to quote within my posts).


I will admit that there are some days that I get pissed off at myself for having had spent more time online and typing than I would have preferred, but in the end, I am not being coerced in regards to how I choose to spend my time.. so in that respect, through the years, my typing of posts has been a voluntary activity - and of course, I would prefer that activity to have had been more beneficial (whether merely to me or to some others) than burdensome.

I am not really measuring how long it takes me to type my posts, but for sure, if research has to be done or information compiled that is not already within my database, then some of the posts could end up taking a considerable amount of time.. not like some of the posts of some other members.... for sure, we have members who set forth posts that are like pieces of art...... and so sometimes such posts can inspire a lot of thinking from myself, and surely members here are on all kinds of levels - so some posts might be tailored to members who are different from myself in terms of their newness (or lack thereof) to bitcoin or their technical knowledge about bitcoin (or whatever the topic of the post/thread).

Probably, there have ONLY been a few instances in which I have really gotten irritated about how much time I was spending to respond to one or more posts, and probably the most frustrating of times had come when I had typed out a post, and for some reason the post ends up getting lost (power failure, posting error, user error, or some other mistake).**  Losing the contents of an already drafted post can be very frustrating, sometimes... I am glad that it has not happened to me too many times.  

**I believe on more than one occasion, I had accidentally clicked on the refresh page button while in the middle of drafting a post, and that does not go over very well in terms of being able to recover the draft of the post.  On the other hand, in my experience, accidentally closing the page while in the middle of drafting a post usually has not resulted in losing much if any of the drafted text by just reopening the draft post from the browser's history.

Explanation

The biggest irony is that it is a complete myth (lie) that high cholesterol is caused by any of those things on that list.

The myth is perpetuated by garbage studies, paid for by the corrupt health associations, that don't do proper controls. The survey subjects that they find that have high cholesterol primarily eat diets high in sugars, carbohydrates, processed foods, and processed seed oils... and also so happen to eat eggs, cheese, cream, butter, and meat. So those studies falsely associate the latter foods with high cholesterol. (As a side note, these high cholesterol subjects also show highly elevated levels of triglycerides, which are typically associated with chronic consumption of large amounts of alcohol as well. Interesting, right?)

They NEVER do a controlled study on people who have diets primary of the latter (meat, cheese, diary, eggs, butter) but not the former (sugar, carbs, processed foods, seed oils). This is by design. They actually WANT that misassociation so they can then sell it to the public.

You want to reduce your cholesterol? Stop eating sugar, carbs, and junk that's not real food. Keep the meat, cheese, whole milk, eggs, butter. Eat clean, healthy vegetables. Cook with ghee, real butter, and/or a high quality olive oil. Stay away from seed oils.

I would also say, stay away from alcohol. It's basically high-test liquid sugar but with worse effects on the endocrine system, internal organs, liver, etc. But I know very few will do that, lol.

https://news.bitcoin.com/blockchain-com-inks-sponsorship-deal-with-the-nfls-dallas-cowboys/

I personally believe that providing links is the better practice, even if the source may be shown in the chart.

Makes it easy for members here to verify the source, and potentially look into the context of the chart.

I also believe that it is better to explain links and charts.. but of course, opinions are going to vary regarding how much explanation to provide or whether to provide links (to help make it easy to show source).

Of course, sometimes members will provide charts that they have themselves made... and many times it is better to provide some kind of a title or explanation for what the chart means, and of course, to assert who is the author (creator) of the chart (in this example it is the member himself/herself).  Surely some members are more clear regarding their explanations than others, and some members are likely more inclined to want to engage in brainstorming about the information that they provide (receptive to potential criticisms) than others.   

I personally have more respect for the members who are able to accept comments and criticisms without getting too defensive about the matter, but I also recognize that some of us can be a bit annoying with our interactions and our commentary (I am not excluding yours truly from that potentially "annoying" category.)... 

All the cool kids are doing it. Guess I'd better light up too.

Haha, I appreciate your support man. I edited it, looks good right?
Thank you philipma1957 and cAPSLOCK 

Your "arguing" is at or below the level of other rainforest shitcointourists here, which is basically a stream of loosely connected fallacies and random insults.

It's puzzling to me why you all come here of all places with the "more than one blockchain" stick up your collective ass but whatever floats your boat.

oh well you ruined it.

am I nuts I thought he was at 645

 I gave him 21 to do 666

and he is still at 647 not 668

Never mind

Oops

do not post no one merit him please wait a minute