I seriously consider buying more around 20,000 dollar.
Sure, if you had a time machine you could do that.
Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 4493. (Read 26709534 times)
November 10, 2021, 03:12:54 PM
Sure, if you had a time machine you could do that.
November 10, 2021, 03:10:18 PM
Hey Rainforest, how is that DGB working out for you?
Man.... You rly don't want to anger the Gawds when the flippening happens!
*edit(): Btw... I'm back in Sh!ba for a bit.... it will lose probably another Zer0 then I'm back to my dear old friend DGB.
So far that hot garbage is down 8% from when you bought.
I hope BTC keeps going up the rest of the week and month. Not just because it's inevitable, but also to teach these shitcoin holders a hard lesson.
Bought at 0.047$ then sold at 0.057$ ... then bought again at 0.052$ and sold 0.056$ ... now waiting for a dip, while I'm sitting idle in Sh!b that I bought at around the price it is now... maybe I'm a few percentages down, but I just let it sit for a week or two, I don't mind waiting.
Penny Stock Hero.
You could be the mascot if they ever made a videogame out of this nonsense.
November 10, 2021, 03:06:19 PM
All bitcoins that are not moved for a certain period of time (20, 50, or 100 years) should be presumed lost and then recycled through the usual mining process. I'm not sure if that can be achieved through a soft fork.
FUCK YOU WITH A RUSTY PIPE FOR SUGGESTING SUCH GARBAGE.
November 10, 2021, 03:01:24 PM
November 10, 2021, 02:24:39 PM
All bitcoins that are not moved for a certain period of time (20, 50, or 100 years) should be presumed lost and then recycled through the usual mining process. I'm not sure if that can be achieved through a soft fork.
If something like that occurs, the whole idea of BTC will be lost
You can hold BTC for years and years and never move any satoshi, and you'll have access to the coins you have
Some move to recycle BTC can create a breach
Satoshi itself said (like LoyceV pointed above) the lost coins can be a donation to BTC
Knowing human nature by 2075 the move them or lose them movement will be strong 💪 and they will begin to move frozen coins. So any 2009 still in place will have a time period to shift them or lose them.
So a 50 coin address simply need to pull .00000001 to a new address and problem is solved as it prove the coins are not abandoned.
Satoshi mentions lost coins but not abandoned. The powers to be will say those are abandoned and will take them..
To those that think it is wrong or bad or terrible oh well I don’t worry as I figure I will be dead around 2047 if lucky maybe 2057.
November 10, 2021, 02:18:42 PM
As far as burning Satoshi's coins, the topic is highly controversial, as such it'll most definitely cause a fork. It's best to leave such things in incompetent hands of Faketoshi. Let him fork the chain once again unlocking Satoshis coins to himself. That should be his last battle after which he'll become a footnote in bitcoins history.
All bitcoins that are not moved for a certain period of time (20, 50, or 100 years) should be presumed lost and then recycled through the usual mining process. I'm not sure if that can be achieved through a soft fork.
Then don't complain about what CSW is trying to exploit! Like Damocles in the Greek mythology, we are for ever forced to sit beneath a sword suspended by a single hair to emphasize the instability of a king's fortunes.
November 10, 2021, 02:18:30 PM
Hahah, Scarcity? LoL ! There are currently over 17.000 Bitcoin like Cryptos 
Its supply is unlimited.
How do you counter this fact?
Another point... - Coins that got "Lost" are already in circulation. I think you guys still live in 2013 xD
Ik ik science stinks sometimes right ? Hue hue
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2C8Od8j8hNQ
Beep beep
Its supply is unlimited.
How do you counter this fact?
Another point... - Coins that got "Lost" are already in circulation. I think you guys still live in 2013 xD
Ik ik science stinks sometimes right ? Hue hue
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2C8Od8j8hNQ
Beep beep
November 10, 2021, 02:15:32 PM
All bitcoins that are not moved for a certain period of time (20, 50, or 100 years) should be presumed lost and then recycled through the usual mining process. I'm not sure if that can be achieved through a soft fork.
If something like that occurs, the whole idea of BTC will be lost
You can hold BTC for years and years and never move any satoshi, and you'll have access to the coins you have
Some move to recycle BTC can create a breach
Satoshi itself said (like LoyceV pointed above) the lost coins can be a donation to BTC
November 10, 2021, 02:12:38 PM
Hey Rainforest, how is that DGB working out for you?
Man.... You rly don't want to anger the Gawds when the flippening happens!
*edit(): Btw... I'm back in Sh!ba for a bit.... it will lose probably another Zer0 then I'm back to my dear old friend DGB.
So far that hot garbage is down 8% from when you bought.
I hope BTC keeps going up the rest of the week and month. Not just because it's inevitable, but also to teach these shitcoin holders a hard lesson.
Bought at 0.047$ then sold at 0.057$ ... then bought again at 0.052$ and sold 0.056$ ... now waiting for a dip, while I'm sitting idle in Sh!b that I bought at around the price it is now... maybe I'm a few percentages down, but I just let it sit for a week or two, I don't mind waiting.
November 10, 2021, 02:10:44 PM
All bitcoins that are not moved for a certain period of time (20, 50, or 100 years) should be presumed lost and then recycled through the usual mining process. I'm not sure if that can be achieved through a soft fork.
I'll agree with LoyceV, satoshi and bitcoinPsycho, but I have to ask: Why should they? How does this improve the currency in ANY way?
November 10, 2021, 02:01:25 PM
November 10, 2021, 01:48:12 PM
All bitcoins that are not moved for a certain period of time (20, 50, or 100 years) should be presumed lost and then recycled through the usual mining process. I'm not sure if that can be achieved through a soft fork.
That's dumb. Private keys are forever.Value comes from scarcity, not abundance.
To quote someone who might know a thing or 2 about Bitcoin:
Lost coins only make everyone else's coins worth slightly more. Think of it as a donation to everyone.
November 10, 2021, 01:19:38 PM
I seriously consider buying more around 20,000 dollar.
November 10, 2021, 01:04:45 PM
As far as burning Satoshi's coins, the topic is highly controversial, as such it'll most definitely cause a fork. It's best to leave such things in incompetent hands of Faketoshi. Let him fork the chain once again unlocking Satoshis coins to himself. That should be his last battle after which he'll become a footnote in bitcoins history.
All bitcoins that are not moved for a certain period of time (20, 50, or 100 years) should be presumed lost and then recycled through the usual mining process. I'm not sure if that can be achieved through a soft fork.
November 10, 2021, 01:01:32 PM
November 10, 2021, 01:01:14 PM
As far as burning Satoshi's coins, the topic is highly controversial, as such it'll most definitely cause a fork. It's best to leave such things in incompetent hands of Faketoshi. Let him fork the chain once again unlocking Satoshis coins to himself. That should be his last battle after which he'll become a footnote in bitcoins history.
All bitcoins that are not moved for a certain period of time (20, 50, or 100 years) should be presumed lost and then recycled through the usual mining process. I'm not sure if that can be achieved through a soft fork.
November 10, 2021, 12:49:58 PM
"Faketoshi trial day 7 notes...
Has any court ever asked him how he managed to "sign" a message for Gavin from the fourth block's address, but now says he doesn't have the key as it's "held" by a bonded courier?
But why would they? The argument between both sides in this circus is whether Faketoshi is 100% Satoshi or 50% Satoshi. Both sides would gladly attribute 22M BTC to Faketoshi if they could.
BSv's law firm already opened up their cards and showed why they need this 50% or 100% judgement in their formal letters before action sent to all of the devs:
Quote
10. In accordance with their fiduciary duties, each of the Developers is obliged to:
a. Provide access and control to TTL of the BTC in the Addresses, which it owns
but cannot access or control due to the hack/theft.
b. Take all reasonable steps to ensure that TTL has access to and control of the
BTC in the Addresses.
c. Take all reasonable steps to ensure that effect is not given to the fraud, by
ensuring that the BTC in the Addresses cannot be dealt with by anyone other
than TTL (including those who have misappropriated the private keys or
otherwise wrongly have access to the private keys).
https://www.ontier.net/ia/a1letter-before-action-from-ttl.pdfa. Provide access and control to TTL of the BTC in the Addresses, which it owns
but cannot access or control due to the hack/theft.
b. Take all reasonable steps to ensure that TTL has access to and control of the
BTC in the Addresses.
c. Take all reasonable steps to ensure that effect is not given to the fraud, by
ensuring that the BTC in the Addresses cannot be dealt with by anyone other
than TTL (including those who have misappropriated the private keys or
otherwise wrongly have access to the private keys).
If you still have any doubts, here's the statement directly from Faketoshi:
https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1457437100631105536
I found it helpful to stop using my logic while trying to analyze this case, (like why would you even need a supercomputer to mine on a testnet???) and just realize that the true answer to everything in this case is
this threats are most likely the reason why some developers already stopped working on bitcoin. future bitcoin devs must contribute their work completely anonymously.
and he wants to sue bitcoin nodes too? I can't wait to get mail from faketoshi's lawyers.
edit: can we just burn satoshis bitcoin? can someone make a BIP?
Yep i've been preaching for devs to go anonymous for a while. Every aspect of BTC will be tested over and over again. Every link in the chain will be hit many times in an attempt to find the weakest one. You have to be delusional to think that you can work on a new global monetary system in the open without any repercussions. Is there any example in history where people in power welcomed attempts to change the status quo? There's a reason why original dev stayed anonymous, all other devs should follow in those footsteps.
Faketoshi, he's largely irrelevant. If it wasn't him it would've been someone else. If anything, his stories are entertaining more than anything else, it could've been (will be?) worse if there was a more competent person attacking. Bitcoin doesn't fit in the current legal framework, how each country adopts it, was always to be decided at the highest levels, and not in some local kangaroo court.
As far as burning Satoshi's coins, the topic is highly controversial, as such it'll most definitely cause a fork. It's best to leave such things in incompetent hands of Faketoshi. Let him fork the chain once again unlocking Satoshis coins to himself. That should be his last battle after which he'll become a footnote in bitcoins history.
November 10, 2021, 12:01:25 PM
November 10, 2021, 11:36:54 AM
November 10, 2021, 11:17:20 AM
chopper is just warming up
the next higher level is approached
🚁 Jump to: