Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 4827. (Read 26608062 times)

I think the point is that coinbase is insured for USD and not BTC so if they force people to panic they are going to move into the insured asset. This is a classic FUD move.


That was one person that they could verify, do you think coinbase is sharing their customer list with anyone besides the fed? They are fearmongering and whether it was to force a market move or for some other reason I can only speculate.

Afa ARS comments, yeah it seems the campaign to smear bitcoin is still in force in the mainstream, when that dissapears will be the biggest signal the planet has ever seen. Be nice to know how many of the commentors are shills and how many are just morons.

The government knows what you can't control have benefit from them.The time is not too late when government will be conducting awareness camps to tell people that bitcoin is future so decided you best future.Maybe hyperloop journey has already started where bitcoin is governments support.

Explanation

first off...dont call me shirley...   second...elbow?  its a freakin hockey stick...come on...  

As for Ichimuko kinko hyo or one glance equilibrium chart...it is mushin no shin or mind with no mind. One should not have to think about it...it just is.

anyway...thanks I think...    

+1 WOsMerit


---------

Here is a look at local time frames for today with a few notations. Stack your sats...hodl on dearly...because one of these candles is going to light off and not look back imho.

1h


4h

I think Saylor mentioned he worked with Coinbase to do a bunch of buys.

For most retail exchanges, you can see limit orders. For some, you are limited to buying at whatever the rate is (market order basically). You can do it manually, but some exchanges have an api and you can have a bot do it for you all day and all night.

I once had a sell bot on cryptopia before it died, I had it set to sell a particular amount, or rather set a limit sell order just above the spread, so I always get the best price at the time, but it won't actually sell unless someone else buys it. Then the bot would just keep selling every 20 or 30 minutes, and delete any orders older than 3 or 4 hours, so it keeps doing that until all of that particular coin is gone. (ok, I was selling a shitcoin, trading it for bitcoin.)

There are more sophisticated bots now that do all sorts of things, but you can also set them up to just buy.

Also, some of the exchanges I use now have some sort of automatic rebuy / DCA built in, which you can set up.

Jeah... why use bitcoin when you already have Money Transfer??

Well for this reason:

Cutting middlemen fees frees resources for the more important things.

Can't do much more than "indeed" you, Cap'n.


+1 WOsMerit indeed.


Kind of a big deal indeed. Imagine all the remittances to the homeland slowly crossing over to bitcoin -  people working in the USA, EU, Japan sending their hard earned money to their families in South America, Africa, Asia. Of course, the government offering a tasty incentive (30$ for El Salvador) does help to push adoption, as does the promise of no commission. But even if there were small commissions, WU and other fiat mongerers are going to be toast if this thing takes off.

+1 WOsMerit

I like where you put the little elbow.  I surely do not know as much as you about technical things (I still have no idea what the ichimoku clouds are)... but it seems to me that somewhere between 50-56k might be a bit of a fight, but there is a certain point where not that much is holding honeybadger back...

Explanation

I'll call this the supply shock projection.

Next up, Lambo supply shock.

HEY WOers!

I am cleaning out some of my problem channels on my little Raspiblitz node and am going to have some incoming liquidity to aim at new nodes.  I was starting to research what's out there that would likely increase my connectivity, and traffic.  And it's really hard to do... It's hard to see what channels would be USED by the network etc.

Then I had a thought!

Maybe one of you might want some inbound liquidity?  I certainly understand the whole OpSec angle etc... but I personally do not mind if you don't!  Particularly if you are a regular denizen here. 

So let me know...  In about 4 hours I will have as much as 3 million sats to open a channel with maybe more depending on if I close some more weak channels today cooperatively.  But would also be willing to go down to 500k.  My channel size philosophy has changed over the months.  I started out not really caring about size, then I set the min channel size i would accept at 1mm. And it's still there.  But with MPP active there are arguments for smaller channels as well.  But I think I still prefer aiming for 1mm at the lowest.

I am a "BOS" ranked node with a score of 11940298 putting it in the top 200 nodes. I expect that to go up a little bit as I add back the channels. I am well connected.  Well maintained on this little node, and plan to leave it up indefinitely.  I have a much larger node running on server hardware, but I might take that one down as it costs me money.  And if so, I may also migrate sats over to this little one.  But at the moment this little guy has about 2/3rds of a bitcoin liquidity, but heavily skewed to inbound liquidity, so opening a channel to you would help me!

Anyone interested?

PS.  I used to keep my channels fairly balanced.  But this is 1.  A LOT of work and not easy to do, and 2. Futile in my humble opinion.  My node keeps itself fairly well balanced with relatively ample liquidity on both sides.  So I do not care as much if channels get out of "balance" as long as they don't just sit dormant.  in fact some of my most active channels tend to have all the liquidity sitting on one side or the other of the channel and then whoosh over to the other side...

Bitcoin will be legal tender in El Salvador in 7 days.

First TV commercial for Bitcoin:


https://twitter.com/BTC_LN/status/1432622192005550091?s=20

Read together with me:

Who would have ever thought it.

Explanation

Well... That's more than one whole bitcoin!

But it was probably ETH or some other shit tokens.

Actually the comments are the best part.  VERY VERY negative on "crypto".  Funny that many of us here would agree with them to some extent.



Note the upvotes as well as the "Editors Pick" tag.  LOL.

I hope I will live long enough to see the end of "Still Early".

That's still sightly nice quality... maybe next time try some pink.. but otherwise, yesh!

September 22, actually.

EDIT:
VVV Bad quoting mate, I never said that!

Explanation

Explanation

plot twist: proudhon is a mod