Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 4896. (Read 26609200 times)

the noon wall report



dyor

1h



4h

stronghands

@jayjuangee, I love your personnal memo: "ESG, KYC & AML are attack vectors on Bitcoin"

however it doesn't mean that those vectors will work, we just have to outsmart them, and frankly they are in the process of self destruction... so what ever they say, don't trust them, what ever they do, know it's a trick, do your own research and  as always : question more.

Tether is NOT Bitcoin. So we're not affected by this tether shit (or less affected than some peeps here would love to think).

Meanwhile, we're witnessing some nice pump. $50k by the end of the week. Would love to hear some comments from our beloved proud honey on this? Let me guess: Bitcoin is not going higher than $50k and if it will it's just another dead cat bounce and won't last long... 

Explanation

"We spent $2.26 trillion over 20 years in Afghanistan which has a population of 37.5 million which is $60,267 per capita. Afghan per capita GDP is about $500 by exchange rates and $2,000 by PPP (purchasing power parity). If we use the higher latter number, we could have provided 30 years worth of income for every single person living in Afghanistan instead of 20 years of war, or more than doubled living standards by 150% for 20 years.  Another perspective, at 4 persons per family, we could have built each family in Afghanistan a $241,000 manson (a new apt in Kabul costs say $25k).  The irony too is that the CIA started the Taliban to fight the soviets.  Anyways, what an immense waste, normal whenever gov. touches anything."

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/taliban-official-confirms-no-democracy-afghanistan-council-will-likely-rule?commentId=27fdc2c6-0b3e-4f01-a91e-59357831d0e1

almost the entire cryptos market cap

If some of these kinds of entities are largely shut out of dollar systems then they better fucking be making some money on whatever they are trying to hold.. in other words, some assets go up and some go down, and hopefully they are at least holding the equivalent value of the dollar and perhaps even having some cushion profit in there.. because volatility can be a bitch if there is not some attempts at managing that they do not lose money when they are presumptively trying to stay safe along the way and able to cover any withdrawals that might happen in the process of keeping tether or dollars available for those who may want to convert to dollars rather than tether.


Of course, markets are dynamic, and people use the various stable coins to get in and out of bitcoin, and surely tether has been amongst the leaders (at least one of the first to take up the mantel) and the least regulated and the most attacked.. but surely does not even mean that their situation has been static or is going to carry out the same into the future, either.. 

In the end, you are the one spreading a kind of exaggerated speculative nonsense to make it sound as if you are raising some kinds of novel points regarding how bad of a weakness (or attack vector, or scam) or whatever you are vaguely claiming regarding it's supposed lack of solvency (emphasis on "supposed"), so you likely deserve at least as much blow back that you are getting, and likely more than what you have gotten, so far.. especially seeming to largely be raising old already rebutted tether-FUD talking-points.. to rival up those already inclined towards bitcoin naysaying and other easy distractions away from the actual and real power of our king savior, aka daddy badger.

This complaint is not really all that valid...plenty of money market funds with all kind of 'strange' collateral.
Nobody says peep squeak about them, however, I never buy those, only Treasure money market (losing a bit on the yield, of course).
There is NO collateral quality difference between USDT and USDC, imho. I have much less USDT than USDC though, so, I guess, I was affected by FUD.

buy the top..bee the top!! ;-D gogogogogog

Did the loony bin give you internet privileges after 6 months or something?
Piss off and take you deluded garbage back to the p+s section.

as he wants to see mine to travel interstate, and maybe even one day shit in my own toilets, I think it's only fair that transparency works both ways, unless of course our neo feudal lords deserve total privacy, afterall aren't they so sophisticated that they only deserve privacy, and determine the truth, for our own good of course...

imho, his family are part of the mortals enemies of mankind...   , like the one of Mike Pence .

Up and up she goes
OGs looking at the moon
does this pump have legs




#haiku

Explanation

Not even half as entertaining as r0ach.

Goin' up y'all

Who is this guy? Roach-Lite?

GTFO our thread.

Several of those expectations are not bad, elliottflz65; however, I have some conceptual difficulties plugging in too many assumptions in regards to either the level of adoption or the magnitude of thew direction (outcomes of various battles that may play out)..

I am pretty sure that you are correct directionally in regards to less and less cyclical volatility, but that would not necessarily suggest that there would not be other kinds of volatility that is just not tied to previous cycles of volatility that have so far been programmed in, and really seems logical that such lessening of rewards takes away that specific kind of cyclical volatility..

And maybe it is not even too much of a stretch to presume that various kins of bitcoin adoption from individuals, institutions and governments is going to continue to increase at decently high levels and then cause bitcoin's market cap to go up and both cause less volatility but also make it much harder for anyone, even the then BIGboys, to manipulate bitcoin's price..

....but if we are presuming about magnitude, then still too many assumptions in there for me, even if some of the outlining of various UPpity scenarios are relatively fair presumptions in regards to likely ways that future bitcoin battles will play out in bitcoin's favor.....but still how much..

Is it really inevitable for Bitcoin to follow a kind of mathematical trajectory when we have human behavior in the mix, too.. including that there could be both set backs and advances that go on within short periods of time, but I am hardly convinced that the adding up of all the plusses and minuses of what could happen inevitably leads to some kind of realistic quantification of where the trajectory is going to be in terms of magnitude expectations, even if the odds seem quite great that you are directionally correct..

I would speculate that getting magnitude of bitcoin's adoption, advances and lessening of volatility correct would be more a matter than luck than something that could be predicted with any kind of high level of confidence.   

  His family shouldn't concern us.  They're not public figures.
 If you really want to know about their medical status though, all you have to do is employ them and then apparently you get to demand they get vaccinated and prove it to you so you would know it all.

It will eventually get to those absurd numbers, and by then, it won't seem as absurd anyone once it is the present and reality. And by absurd, I'm talking about the Hal Finney numbers of $10m, to the other projections that I have seen going up as high as $50m to $100m per whole coin.

We just need to live long enough to see our BTC pay for everything we would ever need (assuming we have say 1 BTC, and we don't need anything more than $50m to $100m in our lives.)

We see the matter differently... richie.. and not that we can exactly consider that you have any kind of persuasively credible perspective when it comes to something like the role of tether or its potential solvency. since you had been so easily lured into thinking that there was actual legitimacy in those fairly obvious bcash scam variants.


I stand by my earlier digg.. and sure, your further explanation puts your position into some better context.. so thanks for that.