Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 5429. (Read 26609871 times)

legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 13505
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
Nice pump meanwhile...  Cool and yes we need to keep chartbuddy (it's back finally)  Wink

Pump?
legendary
Activity: 2422
Merit: 1191
Privacy Servers. Since 2009.
Nice pump meanwhile...  Cool and yes we need to keep chartbuddy (it's back finally)  Wink
copper member
Activity: 1316
Merit: 715
Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 2267
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
Though I have one complain...   PLEASE let xhomerx10 gear/HAT chartbuddy up and Gogogogo

Before xhomerx10 starts warming up his tablet, I'll just point out that Chartbuddy is overdue for a makeover so anything based on the current avatar will likely be short-lived. Also I'm quite particular that the red/green blue eyes are correctly arrayed.
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 2267
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
I'm too "young" here to have really experienced ChartBuddy's posts, so just a suggestion: can the frequency of ChartBuddy be adjusted based on how active the topic is? There's not really a point of having 20 graphs on a page if nobody else posts.
But if there's a lot of activity in this topic, that usually means there's a lot of activity in the market, which means more frequent ChartBuddy posts would be a good thing!
So: how about one graph every N posts in this topic? I'd be more than happy to create a post counter somewhere on loyce.club so the bot can easily keep track of when to post.

Believe me, I've tried to work out how to implement such a scheme and it just can't work well. Chartbuddy's output is about the market and not based on the volume of this thread. Longer times between posts don't work either since any big moves which are reported three hours later are old news and in any case, compressing three or four hours of data onto a chart makes it useless. So basically, not going to happen. Not because I'm ideologically opposed to it, it's just not a good use of my time. (Edit: a separate thread ain't gonna work either. It's been tried).

I've considered other options such as ON/OFF bitcoin addresses (now made infeasible by high fees), in-comment voting (possibly restricted to legendaries) and other similarly Rube-Goldberg type schemes. My latest is to have on/off posts which are weighted by merit. I think though that the most reasonable option is going to be making Chartbuddy invokable (again, limited to legendaries). I'm sure I'll get around to it sometime.

I just turned Chartbuddy on quick because, y'know big price moves and all but it appears that some people have PTSV from the robot wars.
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 2267
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
The reason I don't like CB is the fact that it's just posting a chart, information that I or anybody else can and do look up ourselves when we need it, it feels like force feeding something I don't want to be fed.

I will point out that Chartbuddy actually aggregates an hour's worth of data into a 3d chart which allows for movements and wall changes to be visualized in a way that's otherwise not intuitive. Which is not to dismiss your annoyance, just to point out that it's not just chart regurgitation.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
So: how about one graph every N posts in this topic? I'd be more than happy to create a post counter somewhere on loyce.club so the bot can easily keep track of when to post.

Maybe it could check the page number and not post until it's higher than bitcoin price more than once on the same page.

But honestly... considering that we're already bitching about it for 2 or 3 pages after the bot stopped, I'm sure we would have no problem to create enough useless drivel to drown once-per-hour bot posts.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 5146
Note the unconventional cAPITALIZATION!


Only a mom could love a bot like that.

Hi mom!!!!... aka cAPS



I can't wait for you to get to my latest JJG imitation post.  It was a pretty good one, I think.
sr. member
Activity: 616
Merit: 292
I don't know where I'm going, but I'm going.
Chart buddy should stay, posting every 4 hours is good enough.

I agree with suchmoon, trolls are tolerated but important information isn't?

Please make a poll.

OH MY GOSH! just every 4 hours? it should be at least every hour.

WHY?

have you ever asked yourself why the Bitcoin price is so low?

look at the page count you jerk. it's just 28819.

EDIT: that Swedish military fan boy should get his own Bot coded with pussy pics every 4 hours if he is not gay.  Roll Eyes

Oh of course, every minute then maybe? Thread count up and we'll see 500k in no time, we can't even plan the 100k properly before we have to start planning for the 500k one.
sr. member
Activity: 616
Merit: 292
I don't know where I'm going, but I'm going.
Chart buddy should stay, posting every 4 hours is good enough.
I'm too "young" here to have really experienced ChartBuddy's posts, so just a suggestion: can the frequency of ChartBuddy be adjusted based on how active the topic is? There's not really a point of having 20 graphs on a page if nobody else posts.
But if there's a lot of activity in this topic, that usually means there's a lot of activity in the market, which means more frequent ChartBuddy posts would be a good thing!
So: how about one graph every N posts in this topic? I'd be more than happy to create a post counter somewhere on loyce.club so the bot can easily keep track of when to post.

That's actually a good idea, maybe Ricky will make it possible? Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 11299
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
Oh come on now don't fib, no one actually reads a Jay post all the way through, I'm not saying he doesn't make points but it's like an email, you skim it.

I wonder if we could get one of those comment summarization bots working.

It could be programmed to recognize only a few basic things...

-Finger wagging section
-Convoluted figuring of how much BTC you might hold
-Sermons on how to average into and out of positions.

(JJG, I love you... just a little homo)

Only a mom could love a bot like that.

Hi mom!!!!... aka cAPS


Looks better with black background.

I will bear it in mind. This was a minimal effort resurrection.

overall, I like how CB looks and it's hourly posting seems largely aligned with past practice - even though I recall from time to time, even in the past, you would sometimes having some technical difficulty periods.. and even upgrade(update) experiments from time to time..

Of course, Phil could be right about a background contrast of black being better or easier to see, but I also like your customized color.. so black does seem a wee bit boring in that regard, even if there are other colors that are close to black but not quite black, so we might thereby know about your personalized touch to the matter..   I surely don't claim to know much about that color contrast or compliment considerations.  

Looks better with black background.

I will bear it in mind. This was a minimal effort resurrection.

Please stop resurrecting and let the idiot die.

What's the fucking point of chart buddy? it doesn't give any information that we don't already have. Everybody in here watches bitcoinity all the time anyway. It's just irritating.
The reason I wasn't active in this thread earlier was actually because of chart buddy, every time you dropped in on this thread you would see that fucking bot in post after post, taking up space and giving no useful information.
I basically stayed in the "Gentlemen..." thread or did not post at all until the idiot poster was gone.

Stop holding back, Arriemoller.

Say how you really feel.

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

My tolerance for whining is zero right now so I shut Chartbuddy off. I notice also that the price dropped after I did so so draw your own conclusions.

Gosh...

You are easy peasy.

I would not mind going on a date with you.

 Wink Wink Wink
legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 4969
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
...

Thank you for that hint. I added it as a source to avoid problems.  Smiley

No problem, ban over something easy to avoid is preferable  Cheesy
Ban? When was the last time anyone got banned for a post in this thread? It's like a backdoor speakeasy, I don't think I've ever seen anyone get banned.

First off this thread still falls under the Global forum rules and there are those that target WO members in other parts of the board so there is zero reason to give them any ammo when a simple referral link complys.

Second refers to the bolded and my question to you is who would want to be the first?

Didn't the cuntonian(s) get banned?
We know they'd have deserved it if not, right?

For begging I think? I don't remember really.
Shit that EXP whatever account is that cuntopian i think.
legendary
Activity: 3304
Merit: 8633
icarus-cards.eu
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 5146
Note the unconventional cAPITALIZATION!
I have to go do some errands, can you please behave while I'm gone.

Of course NOT!
I got a nocoiner story to share, but i'm on the run myself atm.

EDIT:
And Chartbuddy... Can't he open a thread for his bot-posts and further discussion, if complying with tha rulz (or negotiate to be allowed to botpost in his own thread with theymos or board mod of the parent section)?

I'm not really annoyed by the bot-posts, but i can understand Arrie as well.
And yeah: Bring the poll!

answers suggested:
1. yes
2. no, it's spam!
3. idc
4. yes, but not here on WO


With a selection like this interpretation rules must be clear.  That is like a poll with 1 yes and potentially 4 "no"s.  I would suggest something like:

Yes - For it
No - It's spam
Yes - Though I don't really care
No - Though I don't really care
No - Use another thread

And frankly we would not need to have all those options.  In a ways the very best/purest would be:

Yes
No

And people discuss nuance in messages. Either of the other two ways give a bit of an advantage to the "no" vote(s).
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 13505
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
My tolerance for whining is zero right now so I shut Chartbuddy off. I notice also that the price dropped after I did so so draw your own conclusions.

Not searching for a whine either, but just my opinion in very short =

History should be respected, surely history of the biggest thread in BTC history and probably a very famous as important thread...

So please let them come bro

Though I have one complain...   PLEASE let xhomerx10 gear/HAT chartbuddy up and Gogogogo
legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 4969
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
Looks better with black background.

I will bear it in mind. This was a minimal effort resurrection.

Please stop resurrecting and let the idiot die.

What's the fucking point of chart buddy? it doesn't give any information that we don't already have. Everybody in here watches bitcoinity all the time anyway. It's just irritating.
The reason I wasn't active in this thread earlier was actually because of chart buddy, every time you dropped in on this thread you would see that fucking bot in post after post, taking up space and giving no useful information.
I basically stayed in the "Gentlemen..." thread or did not post at all until the idiot poster was gone.

I think your in the minority. You can choose to ignore

I think you are just a loud minority, just like the BLM et al. And he is already on ignore.
I might ignore Ricky as well as a matter of principle.



Edited.

It might be time to put you back on ignore, your going drama queen again.



@Richy_T What about a algorithm that posts based on volume/price change as opposed to time interval?
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Chart buddy should stay, posting every 4 hours is good enough.
I'm too "young" here to have really experienced ChartBuddy's posts, so just a suggestion: can the frequency of ChartBuddy be adjusted based on how active the topic is? There's not really a point of having 20 graphs on a page if nobody else posts.
But if there's a lot of activity in this topic, that usually means there's a lot of activity in the market, which means more frequent ChartBuddy posts would be a good thing!
So: how about one graph every N posts in this topic? I'd be more than happy to create a post counter somewhere on loyce.club so the bot can easily keep track of when to post.
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 3439
Man who stares at charts (and stars, too...)
...

Thank you for that hint. I added it as a source to avoid problems.  Smiley

No problem, ban over something easy to avoid is preferable  Cheesy
Ban? When was the last time anyone got banned for a post in this thread? It's like a backdoor speakeasy, I don't think I've ever seen anyone get banned.

First off this thread still falls under the Global forum rules and there are those that target WO members in other parts of the board so there is zero reason to give them any ammo when a simple referral link complys.

Second refers to the bolded and my question to you is who would want to be the first?

Didn't the cuntonian(s) get banned?
We know they'd have deserved it if not, right?
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 5146
Note the unconventional cAPITALIZATION!

Also, I guess poker is not really poker if it doesn't involve real money (or bitcoin.)


Oh!  I agree with the basic sentiment behind this, but I disagree technically.  I think poker is poker... but put money on the table and the dynamics change quite a bit.  I like playing play money poker just as much as the "real thing" in some aspects.  In fact it is a great exercise in learning to adjust to extreme table dynamics.
legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 4969
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
...

Thank you for that hint. I added it as a source to avoid problems.  Smiley

No problem, ban over something easy to avoid is preferable  Cheesy
Ban? When was the last time anyone got banned for a post in this thread? It's like a backdoor speakeasy, I don't think I've ever seen anyone get banned.

First off this thread still falls under the Global forum rules and there are those that target WO members in other parts of the board so there is zero reason to give them any ammo when a simple referral link complys.

Second refers to the bolded and my question to you is who would want to be the first?
Jump to: