Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 5719. (Read 26610741 times)

Not sure if it's been posted yet but...

https://blog.coinbase.com/coinbase-announces-effectiveness-of-registration-statement-and-anticipated-listing-date-of-its-1509b281f760?gi=4c77392f1de4

TL;DR: No love from communists. Even for communists.

lol, I just got banned from r/communism for posting:

I love you guys!

This is the best subreddit ever.

I feel that I surely did not game this very well, unless there happens to be a run on NFCs in the final hours that causes me some abilities to  sell some of my NFT bags and get some real value with actual BTC.

YEEESSsss!  I just got myself a  JimboToronto-VI  ƒNFT!  I am going to be so rich.

It adds an interesting, random effect to the valuations of fNFTs.

The numbers have to do with account age + activity, I would imagine... Hard to say for sure. But its fun and I'm not stopping until I reach 10,000 BTC, then I'll retire.

Buy my Charlie Lee, its on sale at a steal. Theymos owns the only other one I've seen.

... it has applications in number theory (maybe breaking some crypto?), I like how you've taken a shine to it!

... now if you could just expand as an infinite sum and let me know if you find a close-formed expression for the 3rd term (or higher) coefficients, that would be great, thanx. I'll likely offer a btc bounty for the correct solution for this someday but will definitely make you co-author on a paper to make you famous anyway.

Oh... that explanation regarding the use of the "random" purchase of an NFT makes sense in terms of some of the double-issued fNFTs that end up showing up on the fNFT sales page.

CSW invented math and science. Proudhon invented "blockchain technology", which powers the NFT revolution.

You made a comment that sufficiently suggested worry about DOWNity, so likely no one here is going to give a ratt's ass if you technically did not use the word, "correction."

In other words, I stand by the comments of my earlier post.


Who knows what "resulted" in what?  Sure it is way more accurate to state or describe that something happened rather than suggesting that something caused ("resulted," your word) something else.

If you remember 2018.. there were about 6 times that BTC prices dipped into the $6ks and really failed/refused to break below $6k in any kind of meaningful and substantial way - until it did.

Same thing can happen here in either direction... so suggesting that one direction has more likely than any other (especially when you are talking about DOWNity in a bull market) seems to be grounded more in wishenings rather than based on any kinds of predictive value (whether you are referring to Elliot waves or any kind of other bullshit that is suggesting one direction before the other.. such as you seem to be suggesting down before up.. and yeah, it may happen, an yeah it may not.).



It was already breached a few weeks ago.. remember March 13?

Oh you mean that there is some kind of significance to $60k not being breached at this particular moment.. and sure I agree that it has not been breached, but what the fuck does that have to do with your seemingly lame-ass prediction of "cannot" which it may or may not get breached, and your baloney assertion of some kind of certainty seems to be overstating the predictive value of where we are at determining where we might well be going.. which happens to be either direction.. but slightly in favor of Uppity because we happen to have pretty damned strong indications that we are in a bull market rather than a bear market.. take that wee bit of information for whatever value that you will..

sure we may go down to the low $50ks?  But we might not also.  So asserting that it "may" go down to los $50ks remains a BIG so fucking what, and even seems to be a bit of a weaker assertion than you had been making in your earlier post - that I responded to.


Well it is what it is, I suppose, and maybe you are reading too much into my comments.

I doubt that I need to repeat more than I have already said in response to your various assertions.


Could we just do a battle rather than a war, por favor?

Pretty please (I don't usually beg, but desperate times call for desperate measures).

https://twitter.com/DocumentingBTC/status/1377678653681758215?s=20

Never saw or hear of the names, thx for the info  

Actually I have always suspected that. If you own a shitload of BTC and want to remain anonymous and keep high level of opsec you could pretend to be someone least similar to yourself, like a person of opposite sex, race, another age, nationality etc... so using this method we can easily find out Bawb is in fact a white woman, probably heterosexual, living in China or Russia? OMG!  

proudhon = ‘math & science’ troll. ‘Bitcoin is going to 0’ with a llama as a profile pic.

CSW = Craig Wright (Bitcoin SV asshole)

Just spunked all my fnft btc on randoms... now I just gotta wait and let the coin roll in. Can't wait!

I even don't know who they are.... Do they matter for any reason ?? Anything worth mentioning ??

Screw both of you guys.

I'm Proudhon and CSW.

Even if you are not selling it seems someone got one of your fNFTs at random and now is selling it for 5000 fBTC.

Right now I am torn I would like to get some fNFTs which are available for sell or I could try my luck and try to get one at random for a chance of a satoshi, so far it seems only one person got it.

Sub 30k for 1 week and then my attention will be grabbed.

Today makes 3 months and 1 day the entire year of 2021 above every all-time high from any other year.

So until we dip back to 2020 levels much like honey badger philipma1957 don't care.

In fact I just set up a weekly buy with my coinbase account that gives me free btc every 4th week.

2021 is the year of my dreams.