Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 5721. (Read 26610738 times)

MEET ME SOMEWHERE :-D LOL!!

Too many lulz, too few smeritz 
I'm not even bothering with WOsMeriting ATM. That fucker theymos already introduced much too much emission inflation with this devilish craze.

Too late. You're losing out already.
BTW I wouldn't mind a Dude fNFT. I'll pay 500 BTC for it. Anyone?

Still gotta see what the Aprils joke is all about....

Later when i'm home

That Wanka post should be turned into .... an NFT 

I smell a classic in a few years.

My guess? As part of his fNFT lesson, theymos decided to fuck up with emission.

Yeah..

So it seems to me that if Bossian fNFTs are for sale, then it shows that he is still active in the sense that he has to put his forum issued NFT(s) up for sale.. so after you purchase it, you can decide whether or not to put it up for sale or try to flip it.

I will say that in respect to my own forum issued NFTs, mistakes were made in terms of what I did with that information... and how I acted upon it.. but whatevers, it is just for funzies anyhow..

One curiosity that I have regards a couple of my previously owned NFTs (of me) that are currently listed "for sale," and I was pretty sure that I was only issued 7 NFTs, and they were numbered/labelled I to VII.., so currently, as I type this post, why are there two NFT's that are for sale with my name that are numbered/labelled VII? (you can see the ones for sale, here) Seems strange to me.

it has the property

f(x) f(-x) = \frac{\sin x}{x}

I am selling all of my fNFTs on the ETH blockchain as wrapped fNFTs (wfNFT) which I have then put on Binance as Binance wrapped ETH fNFTs (BwfNFT).

Minimum bid: 1 BwfBSV

This fNFT is distracting, but fun... lookie, I got a few more.

Fair enough, shahzadafzal-daffodil.  

 

Frequently, there are "stupid-ass" proposals coming from all kinds of member angles, not limited to and including yours truly.

So, I am glad that you did not get too worked up about my response to your brainstormenings about such lengthenings of posts.

Surely in regards to length and quantity of posts, you have ultimate discretion regarding the extent to which you might skim or skip them including deciding which members to read and which ones to skip or skim in terms of your perception of their babbling tendencies, and I have even mentioned on numerous occasions, when I fall behind, I might ONLY look at the posts that have interesting pictures, and likely other guys have their own ways and methods of involving their lil selfies in the thread including skipping pages completely....

If any one peep falls behind 30, 50, 100 or even 500 or more pages (which may be around a couple of months of posts), it can become quite a daunting task to trying to get through some of those backlog of pages in any kind of substantive way.

Some folks here might recall a couple of years Friends1980 made a pie in the sky assertion that he had planned to read the whole thread from the beginning.. blah blah blah.., and sure he might have read the first 100 to 1000 and maybe even skimmed through several pages before he completely abandoned such project with reluctances to ever mention his "stupid-ass" proposal that ONLY involved his own conduct rather than asserting how the thread should be carried out in the future, blah blah blah...  

Yes, many things can be traded. The question is whether the trade creates or destroys value. For NFTs, I'd suggest the latter. Though I suppose some might get short-term entertainment value from these things, many believe they are the "next big thing". Just look at how many believe that $68M for an NFT is real and not bullshit.

Not exactly. I don't remember the details (and I can't be arsed to check honestly), but the TeXbook says something to the effect that default auto sizes for delimiters tend to be a bit too large, and spaced a bit too widely. I doubt LaTeX improves on that, as the low-level formatting is mostly left as it is in Plain TeX.


How about posting a larger version? I might be able to make out something beyond the bracket size.

EDIT
Wow, AlcoHoDL managed to not only read it, but also make an informed guess at it. I'm in awe.

Why not take care of both style and content?

As for your equation, just by looking at it I'm guessing that it's an infinite product approximation of something that roughly behaves like sinc(x) = sin(x)/x, and is also shifted by Pi/2 on the x-axis.

Am I close? Can you enlighten us? Or is it top-secret?  

Edit: Fixed typo.

Without a legal link into physical objects, NFT are mostly useless IMO. Which doesn't mean they can't be traded, as anyone who's been following shitcoins understands.

I think theymos designed just the right new site layout in this particular day. A lesson, a sign of the thymes.

For that I will suggest always set the height parameter of the image only, width will adjust automatically.

Can't have price movement discussion when there's no price movement.

... it's ok to critique on style when your intellect doesnt allow for critiquing on content

... but I'm quite happy with bracket asymmetry thanx, taking creative licence on this point

... So if you want to choose your own bracket geometries that's fine but you'll have to start by discovering your own fucking equations