I find it funny when I read Bounty/Signature campaigns proudly highlight
Posts on the Wall Observer won’t be counted. I mean why? Why??
Because we're harder to shill here.
No. Don’t fool yourself with such conceit.
The stupendously obvious reasons:
- The Wall Observer does not display signatures. Why do you suppose that signature ad campaigns would pay people to make posts that do not display, um, signatures?
- There is no rule against consecutive multi-posting here; and many other rules are relaxed. If CMs counted WO posts, then regardless of whether signatures are displayed here, sigspammers would bury infofront in so much spam that he would be crushed to death. The CMs want to avoid being charged with murder.
hahahahaha
Sigs were allowed here before infofront took over and there was a petition and a vote and all that after admins shut down the thread.
I personally believe that they could have continued to allow sigs here.. but whatever.. I stated the case several times, and admins have their discretion in regards to such matters.
However, there are other problems that may affect the price in a negative way. The first problem is how exactly the 650K BTC's held by Grayscale will be managed if the premium continues to be negative. Will they apply for an ETF and somehow transfer the BTC's in the ETF market? There is a chance that the things may go wrong for awhile and thus causing some panic in the spot market. The other big problem is that the high expectations may lead to another Dec. 2017 buble like increase that may end just as badly. People thought that the cash settled futures will have a positive impact on the price. Then the great dissapointment came. A similar thing happened when Bakkt started. So there may be some drawbacks after all. Hopefully they will not bring another 2-year bear winter. But once the ETF market becomes fully operational, we can expect at least several trillions $ invested in BTC for a short time of 1-2 years perhaps. And the best scenario is everything to go smoothly with an extended multi year bull market. I think the odds for that are much greater because of the new big players, who don't seek a quick profit.
It wasn't popular but it was pointed out.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/cme-group-targets-bitcoin-if-you-saw-this-guy-would-you-punch-him-in-the-face-2730822One thing is having goals to "tame it" and another thing is actually achieving such aspirations.
None of us are actually conceding that they are going to be successful in "taming" bitcoin are we? I think that many of us are proclaiming that they are going to try hard as fuck, and some of them might end up getting reckt along the way, no?
Hahahahaha
You will never learn, you dumb fuck.
Sure if you keep repeating your dumb ass sales, sooner or later you will be correct (if you have any money left), but surely, it seems a much prudent and practical move to accumulate BTC.. but instead, you are smarter than everyone else.. so may as well continue to play Russian roulette..
or is it called martingale?.. you dumb fuck
Might not be good, Richy... On the one side such an alarm might cause panic or alternatively premature ejection from bed.
I haven't flexed my Android programming muscles in a while. I might give it a go anyway.
Good luck..
The world needs experimenters, inventors
and guinea pigs....
O/T (but nice!)
Ahh, the good things one can learn here this forum...
I had wondered what might happen to my passphrase-protected ("13th Word") Trezor wallet were their servers ever to go down. Turns out that Wasabi Wallet can back up Trezor wallets even when they use the "13th Word" (passphrase), which I did not know until kindly explained to me over there in the Wallets threads.
You have to jump through some hoops (install Trezor Suite which allows bech32 addresses (bc1q.....) so Wasabi & Trezor can exchange info), but it all works. I set-up a dummy account, and it works.
Nice tool for backing up a Trezor if/when it comes to that. Recommended!
* * *
So, when do we leave these boring $57,xxx numbers?
Link or it did not happen, OROBTC!!!!
Or
maybe the more important/accurate answer was provided by AlcoHoDL, anyhow. Perhaps? Perhaps?