A wild guess: today is the last day to get bitcoin below $3900.
Yes. The odds of the truth of that assertion are in the less than 25% arena.
So far so good:
Maybe the odds of going below $3,900 again became slightly better than what they were on March 25, but they have not changed by a lot.. I would not even put them above 45% and that 45% is a bit charitable. You may end up being correct, regarding your guess, but I am not sure what that would be saying, besides you having had gotten lucky in your guess. Do you find that valuable in how you live your life? I certainly try to minimize gambling and guessing in how I live my life, but surely once in a while it is fun.. but that is it.. merely fun rather than something to attach much if any significance.
What are the odds of going below $3900 (again) now, @JJG?
Well, let's just hope that it does come true!
Hey @JJG! Just wondering, what are the odds of going below $3900 (again) now?
P.S:
A wild guess: today is the last day to get bitcoin below $3900.
I follow Gemini, and I'm still good:
How come I was getting you mixed up with my double, JSRAW? I thought that JSRAW made that March/April 2019 prediction about never going below $3,900 and then it is correct that we did not go back below $3,900 until March 2020, and we ONLY went below for a very short time and for only a few dollars.. like the bottom was $3,850 - very difficult to buy that sub $3,900 dip, unless having buy orders already set.
Of course, you are trolling me, yet I will take the bait in part to say that the odds must be less than .5%.. that is less than half of a percent... and let's just call that in the next 10 years. I would not consider it being fruitful for me to attempt to estimate with any further particulars than less than half of a percent... and really my opinion is just that, the opinion of one random dude on the interwebs
(even though my name is not dude).
I decided to send you an smerit Raja_MBZ, mostly because you corrected something in my memory in which I had attributed your various posts to JSRAW, for some strange reason..... rather than rewarding the fact that you seem to be trolling me
about a point that many of us would concede to be a pretty damned low probabilities event.. even though it is a non-zero probability event, at the same time.
More realistic extremes would be discussing bottoms in which the 208-week moving average might end up getting challenged or revisited, and currently such 208-week moving average is at about $9,300 and it seems to be moving up in the vicinity of about $200 per week in current times.
Calling him dangerously insane because he argues for synthetic beef isn't a great starter. Producing beef is incredibly wasteful, not to mention you have to butcher an animal.
I guess one could argue that it's dangerous because it's unnatural - but then look around you, your entire world is unnatural. Microplastics in your tap water, VOCs from your home's building materials, what's a little a synthetic meat in the mix?
Oh gawd.. yefi...
you are not going to stand up for synthetic meat, are you?
Calling him dangerously insane because he argues for synthetic beef isn't a great starter. Producing beef is incredibly wasteful, not to mention you have to butcher an animal.
I'm a proud carnivore, yet I would gladly switch to synthetic meat when it is similar in taste and cost. There's simply no reason not to.
You don't take nutritiousness into account, or are you merely assuming that if it has a label that says "healthy" then it must be nutritious?
Calling him dangerously insane because he argues for synthetic beef isn't a great starter. Producing beef is incredibly wasteful, not to mention you have to butcher an animal.
I'm a proud carnivore, yet I would gladly switch to synthetic meat when it is similar in taste and cost. There's simply no reason not to.
Agreed. I see no extra value in the death and suffering of an animal, and would appreciate synth meat if it tasted like the real thing.
Apparently your own health is of less importance. Go figure? Actually, you might consider yourself as kind of resilient until you start becoming older and you start to realize that you are more sensitive to eating bad foods than you had been when you were younger and growing up... So for example when I was a kid and even into my 30s.. I ate almost anything.. and I always had a ton of energy during that period.. needless to say, things changed after 30s, and cannot always be sure if diet might have ended up being a negative factor years later after having had partook in some pretty unhealthy eating in earlier years, too. By the way, pretty athletically active through my 30s, too.. so it's not like I looked out of shape or unhealthy from my dietary choices.
Calling him dangerously insane because he argues for synthetic beef isn't a great starter. Producing beef is incredibly wasteful, not to mention you have to butcher an animal.
I'm a proud carnivore, yet I would gladly switch to synthetic meat when it is similar in taste and cost. There's simply no reason not to.
Agreed. I see no extra value in the death and suffering of an animal, and would appreciate synth meat if it tasted like the real thing.
I have zero issue eating correctly replicated meats.
How do you correctly replicate a meat, exactly?
You mean put it in a petrie dish and let it grow to "correctly replicated" proportions... ?
yeah, right.