They will surely missed it and they're the one who's been fooled. Who's next?
lol funny. All they've done for the past decade is spam B's search results with "I wouldn't buy Bitcoin, I'd buy such and such shitty stock instead".
They still mentioned bitcoin as a long term HODL.. and maybe paralleling the rational that Michael Saylor has been providing to the space in terms of his intended BTC investment timeline and purpose for investing/hedging in bitcoin to preserve value.
i actually just put in sell orders that are over $100,000/coin. felt odd kinda - almost surreal - thats like something i didnt expect to do for long time yet (least year or maybe two i figured soonest).
Haven't done my sell orders above $100k, yet... but surely feeling like I need to do them soon... I might wait until we get into the $70ks.. even though I appreciate that UPpity BTC price moves could well happen quite quickly, I am still also considering some varying other matters that could affect my choices regarding both the increments and quantities of such supra-$100k sell orders, and I frequently prefer to not have to redo my orders (in either direction) once I set them.. absent some kind of surprise happening that might cause me to feel like I need to engage in such redoings.
By the way, I may have to reconsider my BTC buy orders, too... currently they are set at $1,000-ish increments, and it may well service my psychology and finances better to put them at $1.5k-ish increments in the near future.. got that floating around in my head, too.
Bill Gates = neutral on bitcoin. Still doesn't like it, but he is on record saying he is not short on bitcoin, nor does he have any (and Microsoft too, does not want to invest at this time.) Gates is no longer on the board of MS.
In recent times, there have been a decent number of bitcoiners who have been arguing that anyone who fails refuses to take an adequate stake in bitcoin proportionate to their wealth are effectively short on bitcoin, so sure those kinds of assertions are quite provocative, not only in the sense of the concept of "what is being short" but also the concept of what is a reasonable stake. I personally continue to assert that from a starting point, 1% to 10% would be a reasonable stake, and surely such stake could be adjusted upon studying the space and studying one's own personal circumstances - and surely, I have also asserted that anyone with a less than 4-year investment timeline should end up either skewing in the low end of my recommended starting range and may well be the ONLY peeps who might be justified in NOT investing in bitcoin - even if lower ends of the investment range could still be justifiable and prudent, even for someone with a shorter than 4-year investment time horizon.