Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 6068. (Read 26713256 times)

legendary
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
JSRAW, Btway, thanks to you, I came across this idea, ("a year ago, 4 cents could buy 606 satoshis, and it's a pity that we don't use "sats" as a standard, continue to say 0.01 bitcoin, etc") In case there are lightning network fans here, here's a quick LightningATM tutorial written by @21. Overall a very cool concept ...



thanks, man!

it is time for a well established Layer2 solution because on-chain fees are high and to expensive for txs < 100 USD.

https://ycharts.com/indicators/bitcoin_average_transaction_fee

Of course, if everyone just switched over to native segwit addresses they could save 50% on their fees. This would also have the added benefit of allowing more transactions per block too. Anyone out there who complains of fees and are still using legacy addresses deserve it.

old cold stores with legacy addresses will exist nearly the whole time of the Bitcoin life-cycle. even with just the Segwit addresses a Layer2 solution is needed because sometime in the future the fees should replace the block reward nearly completely. (did you not understand the economical base concept of Bitcoin Huh)

either Bitcoin will be become super expensive or at least one reliable Layer2 solution will be established. BTW, it was Satoshi's intention too to get Bitcoin layer2 ready.

Of course I understand that, it would just help in the meantime. Layer 2 is coming and it is a good thing, but obviously still needs more time.

I do agree.  Cool
legendary
Activity: 2050
Merit: 1184
Never selling
JSRAW, Btway, thanks to you, I came across this idea, ("a year ago, 4 cents could buy 606 satoshis, and it's a pity that we don't use "sats" as a standard, continue to say 0.01 bitcoin, etc") In case there are lightning network fans here, here's a quick LightningATM tutorial written by @21. Overall a very cool concept ...



thanks, man!

it is time for a well established Layer2 solution because on-chain fees are high and to expensive for txs < 100 USD.

https://ycharts.com/indicators/bitcoin_average_transaction_fee

Of course, if everyone just switched over to native segwit addresses they could save 50% on their fees. This would also have the added benefit of allowing more transactions per block too. Anyone out there who complains of fees and are still using legacy addresses deserve it.

old cold stores with legacy addresses will exist nearly the whole time of the Bitcoin life-cycle. even with just the Segwit addresses a Layer2 solution is needed because sometime in the future the fees should replace the block reward nearly completely. (did you not understand the economical base concept of Bitcoin Huh)

either Bitcoin will be become super expensive or at least one reliable Layer2 solution will be established. BTW, it was Satoshi's intention too to get Bitcoin layer2 ready.

Of course I understand that, it would just help in the meantime is all I mean. Layer 2 is coming and it is a good thing, but obviously still needs more time.
hv_
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
JSRAW, Btway, thanks to you, I came across this idea, ("a year ago, 4 cents could buy 606 satoshis, and it's a pity that we don't use "sats" as a standard, continue to say 0.01 bitcoin, etc") In case there are lightning network fans here, here's a quick LightningATM tutorial written by @21. Overall a very cool concept ...



thanks, man!

it is time for a well established Layer2 solution because on-chain fees are high and to expensive for txs < 100 USD.

https://ycharts.com/indicators/bitcoin_average_transaction_fee

Of course, if everyone just switched over to native segwit addresses they could save 50% on their fees. This would also have the added benefit of allowing more transactions per block too. Anyone out there who complains of fees and are still using legacy addresses deserve it.

Segwit intentionally kills accountability - so check for what asking the big guys having audits

Do you mind explaining your comment a bit clearer?

dropping signatures - dropping the sign of a contract / payment - drops accounting
legendary
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
JSRAW, Btway, thanks to you, I came across this idea, ("a year ago, 4 cents could buy 606 satoshis, and it's a pity that we don't use "sats" as a standard, continue to say 0.01 bitcoin, etc") In case there are lightning network fans here, here's a quick LightningATM tutorial written by @21. Overall a very cool concept ...



thanks, man!

it is time for a well established Layer2 solution because on-chain fees are high and to expensive for txs < 100 USD.

https://ycharts.com/indicators/bitcoin_average_transaction_fee

Of course, if everyone just switched over to native segwit addresses they could save 50% on their fees. This would also have the added benefit of allowing more transactions per block too. Anyone out there who complains of fees and are still using legacy addresses deserve it.

old cold stores with legacy addresses will exist nearly the whole time of the Bitcoin life-cycle. even with just the Segwit addresses a Layer2 solution is needed because sometime in the future the fees should replace the block reward nearly completely. (did you not understand the economical base concept of Bitcoin Huh)

either Bitcoin will be become super expensive or at least one reliable Layer2 solution will be established. BTW, it was Satoshi's intention too to get Bitcoin layer2 ready.
legendary
Activity: 2050
Merit: 1184
Never selling
JSRAW, Btway, thanks to you, I came across this idea, ("a year ago, 4 cents could buy 606 satoshis, and it's a pity that we don't use "sats" as a standard, continue to say 0.01 bitcoin, etc") In case there are lightning network fans here, here's a quick LightningATM tutorial written by @21. Overall a very cool concept ...



thanks, man!

it is time for a well established Layer2 solution because on-chain fees are high and to expensive for txs < 100 USD.

https://ycharts.com/indicators/bitcoin_average_transaction_fee

Of course, if everyone just switched over to native segwit addresses they could save 50% on their fees. This would also have the added benefit of allowing more transactions per block too. Anyone out there who complains of fees and are still using legacy addresses deserve it.

Segwit intentionally kills accountability - so check for what asking the big guys having audits

Do you mind explaining your comment a bit clearer?
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1059
nutildah-III / NFT2021-04-01

They will surely missed it and they're the one who's been fooled. Who's next?

They want to impress people with $5million transaction? How cute.

Also, buying $5 mio of ATH. They're clearly the Einsteins of the investment world.
hv_
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
JSRAW, Btway, thanks to you, I came across this idea, ("a year ago, 4 cents could buy 606 satoshis, and it's a pity that we don't use "sats" as a standard, continue to say 0.01 bitcoin, etc") In case there are lightning network fans here, here's a quick LightningATM tutorial written by @21. Overall a very cool concept ...



thanks, man!

it is time for a well established Layer2 solution because on-chain fees are high and to expensive for txs < 100 USD.

https://ycharts.com/indicators/bitcoin_average_transaction_fee

Of course, if everyone just switched over to native segwit addresses they could save 50% on their fees. This would also have the added benefit of allowing more transactions per block too. Anyone out there who complains of fees and are still using legacy addresses deserve it.

Segwit intentionally kills accountability - so check for what asking the big guys having audits
legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
Now everyone wants to embed in Bitcoin, I knew this day would come, little by little those who never believed begin to accept Bitcoin.

Bitcoin soars to new high above $52,000; sustainability concerns rise



Quote
Anthony Scaramucci, founder and managing partner of hedge fund SkyBridge Capital and former communications director under the Donald Trump administration, also told CNBC in Wednesday he sees bitcoin hitting $100,000 per unit before the year ends, citing supply and demand. SkyBridge is also invested in bitcoin.

Source: https://www.livemint.com/market/cryptocurrency/bitcoin-soars-to-new-high-above-52-000-sustainability-concerns-rise-11613617486410.html

BlackRock manages $8.7 Trillion,  that's one company having 9market caps of BTC, they can single handedly add another 0 to the current price

1% of 8.7trillion is 87billion
legendary
Activity: 2050
Merit: 1184
Never selling
JSRAW, Btway, thanks to you, I came across this idea, ("a year ago, 4 cents could buy 606 satoshis, and it's a pity that we don't use "sats" as a standard, continue to say 0.01 bitcoin, etc") In case there are lightning network fans here, here's a quick LightningATM tutorial written by @21. Overall a very cool concept ...



thanks, man!

it is time for a well established Layer2 solution because on-chain fees are high and to expensive for txs < 100 USD.

https://ycharts.com/indicators/bitcoin_average_transaction_fee

Of course, if everyone just switched over to native segwit addresses they could save 50% on their fees. This would also have the added benefit of allowing more transactions per block too. Anyone out there who complains of fees and are still using legacy addresses deserve it.
member
Activity: 119
Merit: 19
Why do you write dates "month/day/year", it's counterintuitive  Undecided
day/month/year is the way to go, from the smaller unit to the biggest  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 3439
Man who stares at charts (and stars, too...)
Good morning  Grin
Anybody want some EspressoCool

Spoiler: Newsletter article about upcoming bitcoin liquidity crisis *rocketgifs*
hero member
Activity: 1876
Merit: 612
Plant 1xTree for each Satoshi earned!
All bitcoins are welcome in my wallet and my nodes. I guess you could run a hacked node to block specific addresses, but man that would have to be picked up by a very large percentage of the network.



You can just have it do a 1 hour routine "grid-search"  on a weekly bases of just the addresses that are manually being added to the protocols to be tracking and spy-banning the child-parent addresses. Smiley  Roll Eyes

And it just updates the new addresses that got spawned from the Devil Mother addresses that spawned them, and it will be easy to get a track of them and blacklisting-blocking specific addresses. Smiley Cheesy   Cry
Good luck hiding those 'banned' addresses from all the other miners. Or maybe I'm misunderstanding your idea?

It's a separate individual chain that spies on the other chain.  Huh  Roll Eyes  Tongue  Cool  Grin  Cheesy ... like some sort of IRS accounting/tracking. Smiley  Cry
legendary
Activity: 2842
Merit: 1511

They will surely missed it and they're the one who's been fooled. Who's next?

lol funny. All they've done for the past decade is spam B's search results with "I wouldn't buy Bitcoin, I'd buy such and such shitty stock instead".
legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 3514
born once atheist


This is to show that I'm not a (complete) curmudgeon and because it *is* kinda cool but I'm not a joiner so don't expect it to stick around for long  Tongue

 I don't believe many in the WO are followers except when it comes to Bitcoin.
 If you decide to give up on it, Erisdiscordia might be interested.


Speaking of hats (great job homer... btw)
Here's a fun fact ....my older brothers name is Marcus and the
only other legendary wo bro I can find in recent thread history (other than myself) that doesn't sport a hat or a campaign sig is......

wait for it....





Marcus_of_..... etc



(still can't figure out that weird equation tho.... but whatever)


legendary
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
JSRAW, Btway, thanks to you, I came across this idea, ("a year ago, 4 cents could buy 606 satoshis, and it's a pity that we don't use "sats" as a standard, continue to say 0.01 bitcoin, etc") In case there are lightning network fans here, here's a quick LightningATM tutorial written by @21. Overall a very cool concept ...



thanks, man!

it is time for a well established Layer2 solution because on-chain fees are high and to expensive for txs < 100 USD.

https://ycharts.com/indicators/bitcoin_average_transaction_fee
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 2106

They will surely missed it and they're the one who's been fooled. Who's next?


but hats off for publicly admitting it. it will give their followers something to think about.  this is a weird phenomenon: individuals or entities with lots of followers that repeat for years that bitcoin is tulip mania have been a great disservice for their followers: kept them from buying bitcoin. i wonder if some of them "feel" some kind of sense of responsibility and give it a second thought. maybe mfool is an example of that.
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 7912


This is to show that I'm not a (complete) curmudgeon and because it *is* kinda cool but I'm not a joiner so don't expect it to stick around for long  Tongue

 I don't believe many in the WO are followers except when it comes to Bitcoin.
 If you decide to give up on it, Erisdiscordia might be interested.


legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2373
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
Now I need a big ole chunk of silver to carve it out...
 (I might have to for settle for brass, or some such, but no Inconel....that shit blows up cutters like nobody's business!)

Maybe cast in pewter?
sr. member
Activity: 546
Merit: 290
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/17/bitcoins-next-resistance-level-isnt-until-170k-says-trader.html

Wait ... next "resistence" is at 170k ?! That would be huge...

EDit: I see only an empty page with some ads on it ?! maybe an embedded video what I don't see...

Edit 2: aaaah adblocker!
legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 3514
born once atheist
                                         

                                  


 I love the smell of freshly-milled Inconel in the morning!  Gentlemen, this is!



So that original pic was made in a hurry at end of shift. I decided it needed some edits....



Now I need a big ole chunk of silver to carve it out...
 (I might have to for settle for brass, or some such, but no Inconel....that shit blows up cutters like nobody's business!)



^This one just for shitz and giggles cuz I was bored , though I doubt I can mill it out....


GO BITCOIN
Jump to: