Whatever point you are making seems like a muddled mess to me. Who gives any shits what you said or may have said in 2018.. but what you are saying now, seems quite muddled.
I wasn't talking about me... See the little quotes in the beginning of the thing, what I wrote? That's the stuff, which was written here in the WO Thread. The same stuff is mentioned yet.
Yes.... I already understood that, and it is hardly worth a comment.
Who gives any shits what posters in this thread said or may have said?
It hardly matters.
This is a place to share ideas, and each person has to come to their own investment decisions and strategies. Sure they can get some ideas from other people in this thread and even share their own ideas.... which is what we have been doing here since 2018 and even earlier than that.
There are very convincing and solid BTC price prediction models in existence including stock to flow, 4 year fractal and exponential s-curve adoption based on metcalfe principles and networking effects. You can give them whatever weight you like or come up with your own models, but seems to me that you are deviating from such models with your doom and gloom nonsense and trying to suggest there is some kind of negative issue (or pattern) in what folks were saying here in 2018 or to give any kind of credit to what appears to be a goofball, namely Alexander_Z.
Yeah of course, it is o.k. to compare the two times and have pretty decent chances of being wrong.
That's good that you are buying the dip.... Not that I was worried about you... we are sharing ideas, so whatever my responses are not just about you.. but responding to some of the seemingly vague doom and gloom, quasi-misleading and seemingly FUD spreading quality ideas that you had shared.
Good that your system is working out for you.
The situations of people are going to vary.. there are not too many people who might get rich off of bitcoin in just one cycle, and some people might take 3-4 cycles before they really start to feel rich or they start to feel that they can slow down on the accumulation phase of making sur that they have enough bitcoin.
I am mot really super surprised by any of the length of time matters, especially when it may have taken 30 - 40 years to get rich in traditional ways of investing and sometimes those traditional ways may not have led to success.. but there can be considerable probability that bitcoin might well allow for a cutting down on those kinds of timelines, maybe even cutting the time line in half or even lower than cutting it in half, perhaps.
Seems like a bad comparison to me, so I wonder what benefits to continue to go on about nonsense comparisons that do not seem to fit this current situation, and likely there are real low ass chances of fitting, something like less than 5%, so it seems to just be a BIG ASS stupid and inappropriate comparison... at least in my thinking.
Thumps Up
https://twitter.com/100trillionUSD/status/1354465936045187078?s=19
We are on a good way...