Don't you know that guys like SwayStar make money no matter what? Even if there was only some kind of small window, they some how figure out how to retroactively disclose how they had made money in order that our confidence is inspired in them.
Delightful, Sway! Posted after I wrote the below sort-of inside joke with Jay, as I was gathering other sundry replies:its just +EV gambling in a sense, its not that dangerous if you know how to manage risk
I have a casino gambling script that is an EXTREME AUTOMATED PROFIT GENERATOR, if
[1] you can predict the outcome of bets only 2% better than random chance!
I offer to sell it to you for only 1.2 BTC. PM me if you want to make money
[2] fast.
1. Focus on the IF!2. For me.
38,250 total acquired BTC / 21,000,000 total supply BTC = .182143 % of total BTC supply
Regarding the math, my favourite is:
38,250/18,479,537.5=0.2069857%
More than 0.2% of total current supply!
Interesting. I myself measure my holdings in proportionate terms of total supply—both maximum and current. I wonder how many people do that—probably not many.
Chaum did go way off the rails with his previous shitcoin, elixir or something. This would need to be whole rafts better, and it's low on my todo list.
Elixxir
(stupid cute spelling, yes) is now part of xx network, according to the porn-blocked website.
I would hope that Chaum learned something about the dangers of centralization from his prior experience. Satoshi solved the problem that killed Chaum’s Digicash; whereas IMO, Bitcoin’s major flaw is its lack of anonymous, unlinkable transactions, which Digicash had a quarter-century ago and Chaum’s eCash design had in the 1970s. (With information-theoretic unlinkability against a computationally unbounded attacker, which even the major “privacy coins” do not have!) Thus my curiosity about this. I have not yet reviewed it—this is not an endorsement.