I'm not saying I'm particularly smarter than anybody, but I know enough to recognize and respect the diligence involved in mastering a discipline as opposed to reading a book or watching a YouTube documentary then resting on the laurels of having convinced oneself that they know things.
But yet you dismiss the work and conclusions of 3,000 architects and engineers that have mastered a discipline that you haven't?
https://www.ktva.com/story/41015153/fire-did-not-cause-world-trade-center-building-7-collapse-uaf-study-suggests
The initial claims that you made, Torque, that were being criticized by nutildah related to how you were proclaiming that David Portnoy was a wall street plant, or something like that, and so the world trade center conspiracy theories seem to be a bit of a deflection of your original claim(s).
Sure, even I did not really agree with the initial strength of nutildah's criticisms, but instead of perhaps attempting to work with nutildah's criticism and attempt to qualify your initial statements a bit better, you doubled down on some other variation of ridiculousness and thereafter distracted from the original claim with the mostly off-topic world trade center baloney... PS now I see that nutildah is pursuing the WTC angle, so whatever.. it's like a stream of consciousness matter, and who can follow anyhow, even active participants...
Anyhow, some of your claims about Portnoy were not very bad.. until you started doubling down on ridiculous....
#nohomo
