@CryptoJelleNL
Hash Ribbons finally showing capitulation has come to an end.
Historically, when this signal prints after a period of post-halving chop, it means the halving event is about to make a mark on price.
Send it higher.
BTC
https://x.com/cryptojellenl/status/1816004795284467987
Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 714. (Read 26729384 times)
July 24, 2024, 02:58:57 AM
July 24, 2024, 02:55:32 AM
stop your self buddy
July 24, 2024, 02:01:13 AM
July 24, 2024, 01:01:16 AM
July 24, 2024, 12:59:33 AM
Received my Gox coins this morning. Sold off the BCH as is tradition and then sent all of it to cold storage.
What a wild ride that was; long term forced holding
What a wild ride that was; long term forced holding
July 24, 2024, 12:01:14 AM
July 23, 2024, 11:55:59 PM
The legislature passes bills, the president signs them into law (although he can be overridden). And generally he should unless there is overriding cause not to because it is the legislature's job to determine law, the president is (supposedly) head of the executive branch. This was a big bill. If you want to say that bills should be smaller and simpler and focus on fewer issues, I can certainly agree with that.
Is trump too old? He's certainly getting up there. He'd be coming to the end of his second term now if it wasn't for shens. I'm not here to try to get you to love or even like Trump but I *do* understand how we got here.
Though all that's up for discussion. But if you think Liz Cheney is in any way viable, you're delusional. She lost her primary 66.3% to 28.9% and that's just Republicans.
As an aside, I'd just like to say that AI is awful. While researching into this stuff, the search engine was giving me its AI attempts at answers and it was egregiously wrong several times (including, at one point, saying that the law in question did not affect the 1301 stuff at all). Potentially quite dangerous.
Also, journalists are fucking awful. Discussing the consequences of a law without citing the law should be subject to being strung up by your toenails.
In addition, having read some of the bill, politicians are awful as well. And fuck the lawyers and lobbyists responsible too.
Is trump too old? He's certainly getting up there. He'd be coming to the end of his second term now if it wasn't for shens. I'm not here to try to get you to love or even like Trump but I *do* understand how we got here.
Though all that's up for discussion. But if you think Liz Cheney is in any way viable, you're delusional. She lost her primary 66.3% to 28.9% and that's just Republicans.
As an aside, I'd just like to say that AI is awful. While researching into this stuff, the search engine was giving me its AI attempts at answers and it was egregiously wrong several times (including, at one point, saying that the law in question did not affect the 1301 stuff at all). Potentially quite dangerous.
Also, journalists are fucking awful. Discussing the consequences of a law without citing the law should be subject to being strung up by your toenails.
In addition, having read some of the bill, politicians are awful as well. And fuck the lawyers and lobbyists responsible too.
My tax returns are over two hundred pages long due to that law.
The fucking paperwork it created is nuts.
For me personally it is one of the reasons maybe the biggest that he should not get elected.
Now if Harris could get Cheney as a vp it would likely pull 10 percent away from trump as many trump voters just hate biden. (rightfully so).
kind of reminds me of this choice electrified or eaten by a shark. 🦈
My choice is neither.
So far so good we got rid of one choice.
July 23, 2024, 11:11:11 PM
The legislature passes bills, the president signs them into law (although he can be overridden). And generally he should unless there is overriding cause not to because it is the legislature's job to determine law, the president is (supposedly) head of the executive branch. This was a big bill. If you want to say that bills should be smaller and simpler and focus on fewer issues, I can certainly agree with that.
Is trump too old? He's certainly getting up there. He'd be coming to the end of his second term now if it wasn't for shens. I'm not here to try to get you to love or even like Trump but I *do* understand how we got here.
Though all that's up for discussion. But if you think Liz Cheney is in any way viable, you're delusional. She lost her primary 66.3% to 28.9% and that's just Republicans.
As an aside, I'd just like to say that AI is awful. While researching into this stuff, the search engine was giving me its AI attempts at answers and it was egregiously wrong several times (including, at one point, saying that the law in question did not affect the 1301 stuff at all). Potentially quite dangerous.
Also, journalists are fucking awful. Discussing the consequences of a law without citing the law should be subject to being strung up by your toenails.
In addition, having read some of the bill, politicians are awful as well. And fuck the lawyers and lobbyists responsible too.
Is trump too old? He's certainly getting up there. He'd be coming to the end of his second term now if it wasn't for shens. I'm not here to try to get you to love or even like Trump but I *do* understand how we got here.
Though all that's up for discussion. But if you think Liz Cheney is in any way viable, you're delusional. She lost her primary 66.3% to 28.9% and that's just Republicans.
As an aside, I'd just like to say that AI is awful. While researching into this stuff, the search engine was giving me its AI attempts at answers and it was egregiously wrong several times (including, at one point, saying that the law in question did not affect the 1301 stuff at all). Potentially quite dangerous.
Also, journalists are fucking awful. Discussing the consequences of a law without citing the law should be subject to being strung up by your toenails.
In addition, having read some of the bill, politicians are awful as well. And fuck the lawyers and lobbyists responsible too.
July 23, 2024, 11:01:13 PM
July 23, 2024, 10:01:16 PM
July 23, 2024, 09:43:41 PM
Mtgox coins have started hitting the market. The first users are beginning to confirm having received their coins. Market only down $2,300 so far today and holding up well. I imagine the losses will accelerate as people get off work or start seeing their nest egg declining as well as more users receiving their coins. Still hoping we see some billionaires taking advantage of the liquidity to do some stacking so things don’t set off a panic.
Nest eggs which in valid claims range between fractions of a Bitcoin up to 200 000 BTC per creditor out of which 15% - 20% are paid out.
July 23, 2024, 09:01:14 PM
July 23, 2024, 08:09:23 PM
Vance is a bit to right but picking Liz Cheney as VP centers the Republicans and I could tolerate that.
But it would mean Trump drops out.
I am not anti Harris but would love for her to pick a centrist candidate for Vp
I am still not thrilled since Trump is still running and he is pretty much not qualified to run the country because he is simply too old.
But it would mean Trump drops out.
I am not anti Harris but would love for her to pick a centrist candidate for Vp
I am still not thrilled since Trump is still running and he is pretty much not qualified to run the country because he is simply too old.
July 23, 2024, 08:01:13 PM
July 23, 2024, 07:56:40 PM
I don't remember this happening as you describe it.
Do you mean TCJA (tax cuts and jobs act)?
That one had some positives as well as negatives.
Negative was that you could basically deduct only the standard deduction and you can put in only $10k in RE tax.
charity for middle class became mostly meaningless since you still just get a standard deduction.
Another negative-you could not recharacterize the Roth conversion (from IRA) back to IRA-that one hurt as it was very useful if a stock price declined.
Positive-20% deduction on a pass through income for businesses, immediate expensing in section 179.
All and all-for me, personally, taxes did not change much.
Additionally, presidents do not pass laws, that's the job of the legislative branch. Though it would be interesting to know which lobbyist group wrote it.
The text in question appears to be section 13303 (3303 in the original).
Quote
SEC. 13303. LIKE-KIND EXCHANGES OF REAL PROPERTY.
(a) In General.--Section 1031(a)(1) is amended by striking
``property'' each place it appears and inserting ``real property''.
(a) In General.--Section 1031(a)(1) is amended by striking
``property'' each place it appears and inserting ``real property''.
And a bunch of other stuff I won't clutter this thread with. It's interesting as it's almost as if it was written to target cryptos without looking like it was targeting cryptos.
presidents pass the law when they sign off.
the only time a law is not passed by the president is when the legislative branch over rides a veto.
trump did not veto that law which specifically favored real estate trades only.
it is one of the worst things done by the U.S.A. to crypto. I was not a fan of Biden and I am not a fan of Trump.
They are no longer good for America and at least one of them is not running.
I get why you favor trump but I am simply explaining to you he fucked crypto bigly with that law.
If Trump were to drop out and Vance were running AND HE PICKED Liz Cheney for Vp I would likely vote for him.
And not vote Harris. I won’t vote for someone that 11 years older than me. At 67 I know enough about old to tell you Trump is shot and won’t last 4 years.
July 23, 2024, 07:01:17 PM
July 23, 2024, 06:24:33 PM
I don't remember this happening as you describe it.
Do you mean TCJA (tax cuts and jobs act)?
That one had some positives as well as negatives.
Negative was that you could basically deduct only the standard deduction and you can put in only $10k in RE tax.
charity for middle class became mostly meaningless since you still just get a standard deduction.
Another negative-you could not recharacterize the Roth conversion (from IRA) back to IRA-that one hurt as it was very useful if a stock price declined.
Positive-20% deduction on a pass through income for businesses, immediate expensing in section 179.
All and all-for me, personally, taxes did not change much.
Additionally, presidents do not pass laws, that's the job of the legislative branch. Though it would be interesting to know which lobbyist group wrote it.
The text in question appears to be section 13303 (3303 in the original).
Quote
SEC. 13303. LIKE-KIND EXCHANGES OF REAL PROPERTY.
(a) In General.--Section 1031(a)(1) is amended by striking
``property'' each place it appears and inserting ``real property''.
(a) In General.--Section 1031(a)(1) is amended by striking
``property'' each place it appears and inserting ``real property''.
And a bunch of other stuff I won't clutter this thread with. It's interesting as it's almost as if it was written to target cryptos without looking like it was targeting cryptos.
July 23, 2024, 06:13:04 PM
$94K by Friday.
/insert delusional bunny meme/gif
Here.
Weeeeeeeeeeeee!!!
Oops not you gembitz
July 23, 2024, 06:07:59 PM
Mtgox coins have started hitting the market. The first users are beginning to confirm having received their coins. Market only down $2,300 so far today and holding up well. I imagine the losses will accelerate as people get off work or start seeing their nest egg declining as well as more users receiving their coins. Still hoping we see some billionaires taking advantage of the liquidity to do some stacking so things don’t set off a panic.
Did all those people also getting some alts back??
And selling them at the same time?
Btw not saying that you got some price actions wrong lately… though I just not following the pad all the way…
If it were me, I'd be selling bcash like mad to buy me...
Do I want a car?
I sure would like a villa
I'd buy more bitcoin
#haiku
July 23, 2024, 06:01:13 PM
Jump to: