Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 742. (Read 26469512 times)

legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 4141
Quiet at The Wall...
What could it possibly mean?
Calm before the storm?

Glass vs. plastic...
Container ain't the problem,
When drinking poison!

Sam Bankman-Fried jailed.
He looks sexy in those pants.
Careful with that soap...

ECB gone nuts,
Claiming that Bitcoin has failed.
How low can they stoop?

Craig Wright on trial.
His White Paper forgery,
Out, animated!

Bored CAM programmer.
Tool paths turned to shurikens!
Katanas are next.

Did you say "crypto"?
Take your Batslap like a man,
Or be gone, you fool!

#7wodigestsundayhaikus


you are getting really good at this...thanks

+7 WOsMerits


---------



~snipped~

... who the fuck got into bitcoin in order to put it all into dollars?

Just saying...


+1 WOsMerit


---------






 I guess it does look a little more relevant to the thread this way but if it were Thursday, I would have made it even more relevant with some choice words on the now-empty axis.

#no homo


+1 WOsMerit


is this the complaint department?  if so do i have to pick a number?   anyway....since 2013 was a UP year....and while we dont know what all of 2024 has yet to bring...it is UP right now...
so i was thinking maybe the GREEN and red should be reversed?  with GREEN highlighting the years instead of red
additionally...the lower left to upper right trend would also be represented 


ok ill shut up now 

-----------

the noon wall report


dyor


D



W

stronghands
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 7912
~snip
Ouch!!!!  That would hurt to have something like that.  Thank god it's not Thursday.

 Sorry JJG.
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1801
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 10832
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
[edited out]
200 wma is useful from a trend observation perspective, but absolutely meaningless as a measure of your current liquid wealth.

It is not meaningless.  It is a way to measure the bottom, so that you may well be able to attempt to make plans about it.

Yes, you can also use BTC spot price, yet do we need to argue about how crazy it fluctuates?

In the end, there are likely a variety of ways to establish a cushion, and if you want to put your default entry-level fuck you status at a higher level, then that might be your way of dealing with such volatility, to the extent that you might be keeping most of your value in BTC rather than cashing out when you reach such perceived status.

Say, tomorrow, something incredibly bad or good happens and bitcoin is at 20K or 100K.
Would you still think that your "wealth" in bitcoin is at 31K(200wma)X(your number of bitcoins)?

I already have a system to deal with it, and so there is an expectation that BTC prices will generally average above the 200 WMA by around 25% or more, and so yeah every once in a while the BTC price goes below the 200-WMA, but there are still presumptions about that not holdings.. unless something changes, and the incredibly good news has already happened so the BTC price is already expected to go up to $100k, it is just a matter of when rather than placing much if any weight on a timeline.. especially a short timeline...

so yeah, if I don't fight too much with your hypothetical it would be a bit surprising to go up 2x in one day, but not totally outside of expectations and/or BTC historical happenings.. and sometimes going a bit beyond extreme.. and even getting 3.5x in a few months could end up happening, so that takes BTC prices to right around $180k... and I am not even sure if that is outside of possibilities, even though it would likely be quite shocking and cause some extra reactions, but guys like me already have some preparations for those kinds of scenarios.. sure admittedly my sell orders currently ONLY go up to $150k, but I would be able to fairly easily place additional sell orders between $150k and $500k.

Same with going down to $20k, I have buy orders going down to $20k, but I would probably get nervious if the BTC price got down to $30k within a few hours, and I would probably pull my buy orders between $20k and $30k, even though I am ready to let them ride down to $30k without making any adjustments.

So surely there could be a lot of depression if the BTC price goes down and refuses to come back up or goes to zero, and those are not non-zero possibilities, but they are pretty damned close to zero. and so we likely are going to be making our base case plans around more likely scenarios rather than making them around outlier scenarios... so if something is expected to have 1% or 2% odds, then we plan 1% to 2% for those things to happen, and yeah, we are not always going to be right, and there are ways to plan for outside scenarios while still mostly be preparing for the more likely base case scenarios.. and so there are some ways to hedge bets, if you had not realized that.

Of course not, I hope, as you should mark to market and not some imaginary lagging number.

I don't see what purpose your advice is having here?   except maybe an attempt to patronize... since it seems that you should sufficiently understand why a lagging indicator might be preferable  to spot price when it comes to long term investing, but instead you seem to be wanting to argue for the mere sake of it... you can look at both spot price and various kinds of moving averages at the same time, and you can compare those moving averages, and my own system of sustainable withdraw looks at both spot price and 200-WMA in order to make various kinds of assessments for sustainable withdrawal, and any one who is willing to use such tool is free to incorporate those kinds of principles, and it is just a tool that can be considered as an option.. and it might be supplemented by raking tools and other tools, so everyone is responsible for their own valuation ideas and how to act upon such ideas in regards to managing their BTC holdings.

~snip
Since you made an artsy-fartsy-feedback statement, I feel inclined to do the same.

I would like both green and red, and I would also like less redundancy.  In other words I do not like the repetition of 2013 and 2024, so if there are going to be 4 edges to the star, then 2013 and 2024 on two of the edges seems appropriate... but then what could go on the other edges?  maybe just blank green?.. or alternating green and red...

but the text cannot be the same. unless there is a green 2013 and a red 2013 and the same would be true for the 2024.. but that still seems redundant in terms of substantive content. .. every 4 years, would be 2013, 2017, 2021 and 2025, but then it would be a future star that anticipates the what's going to come.. something about wannabe sorcerer.
~snip

~snip
It looks like, in part, you already anticipated some aspect of my thinking about the colors. but they probably still would be good to incorporate just the green and the red.. .. yet I am no where near to a "real" artist.

 I guess it does look a little more relevant to the thread this way but if it were Thursday, I would have made it even more relevant with some choice words on the now-empty axis.
#no homo

Ouch!!!!  That would hurt to have something like that.  Thank god it's not Thursday.
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 7912
~snip
Since you made an artsy-fartsy-feedback statement, I feel inclined to do the same.

I would like both green and red, and I would also like less redundancy.  In other words I do not like the repetition of 2013 and 2024, so if there are going to be 4 edges to the star, then 2013 and 2024 on two of the edges seems appropriate... but then what could go on the other edges?  maybe just blank green?.. or alternating green and red...

but the text cannot be the same. unless there is a green 2013 and a red 2013 and the same would be true for the 2024.. but that still seems redundant in terms of substantive content. .. every 4 years, would be 2013, 2017, 2021 and 2025, but then it would be a future star that anticipates the what's going to come.. something about wannabe sorcerer.

~snip


~snip

It looks like, in part, you already anticipated some aspect of my thinking about the colors. but they probably still would be good to incorporate just the green and the red.. .. yet I am no where near to a "real" artist.




 I guess it does look a little more relevant to the thread this way but if it were Thursday, I would have made it even more relevant with some choice words on the now-empty axis.

#no homo
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 4331
^ You guys over complicate things.
A simpler math (for US only):

FU status=$2mil in cash. Long term cap gains are 23.8 % in US, maximum, so you would need to produce about $2.56 mil in profit from a sale (I tried to account for 0-89.25K 0% tax, 89.25-250K 15% tax no NIIT, 250K-553.8K 15% tax+3.8% NIIT and above 553.8K-20% tax+3.8% NIIT; all for married, filed jointly).

Who is calling the kettle black?

I have no problem with the idea of having an extra tax cushion, but you are still not getting to the essential question regarding any kind of BTC valuation plan that presumes mostly holding the BTC rather than selling it all.

We are not selling all of our BTC, even though we are using our BTC to figure out when we reach entry-level fuck you status.

Sure another thing is that we likely have other assets, but if the only thing that we have is bitcoin and cash then surely we can add in some extra for taxes or other expenses, but if we might be considering withdrawing from $2million at the traditional rates of 4% per year which would be $6,666 per month, then yeah we would have to figure out our tax consequences in the event that might be gross rather than net withdrawal.. I think that many of my presumptions is that we are referring to gross rather than net... but I also think that if you are using 4% as your withdrawal rate then you are likely in a very conservative withdrawal mode and either your BTC can grow a lot more or you could actually withdraw way more than your what you perceive to be your budget since you would only be withdrawing 4%, but the dollar value is much more, even right now it would be close to $11k per month rather than $6,666, since the BTC spot price is 63% above the 200-WMA (using 64 BTC as the current default entry-level fuck you status).

You can see it your lil selfie right here by plugging in the numbers.  

If, for an argument's sake, your cost is very low, then you'll need about 50 BTC to sell in order to achieve the FU status in about an hour using bitcoin alone (with taxes all accounted for).

You are not following.

You are using spot price rather than 200-WMA, like me

And alternatively, you are not using AlcoHoDL's 5x spot price system.. which seems to currently be right around 145 BTC based on the last ATH price of $69k and using $10million as entry-level fuck you status.

Neither of us were suggesting to use BTC spot price to figure out entry-level fuck you status or even to be planning to sell very large portions of our cornz.. as you seem to be suggesting to cash it all out. and then what? suffer with $2million dollars... who the fuck got into bitcoin in order to put it all into dollars?  Yeah, sure there are guys out there who are wanting to do that, but that's not what either AlcoHoDL or I had been getting at..and maybe that's why it is seeming to be overly complicated from your spot price focused perspective.

Adjust 50btc to a higher number if your cost is much higher, like above 5K (every 5K increase in your cost= about 10% increase in the number over 50BTC to achieve bitcoin- only fu status; example-if your cost was 20K, then you'll "need" to sell about 81 btc right now to almost insta-achieve fu status by bitcoin alone).

I am not sure what you are getting at, but yeah selling 81 BTC would get you right around $4.15 million in dollars (gross before taxes), but who is wanting to do that? even if any of us were to have 81 BTC.

Just look at the spot, where you can sell right now, not some fancy 200WMA.

I am not sure how looking at spot fixes anything, especially if we are not cashing out of our BTC from here.  But, hey do what you like.

The spot is where you would be selling in case of a need to cash out to achieve fu or to buy something substantial, like a nice house, a small ranch or a lake  Cheesy.

Of course we sell at spot, and so that could be put in our budget if we might aim for selling a certain amount of bitcoin at certain prices, and that may well be a different strategy to pull out some BTC at various prices versus if we were going to do it in a regular and sustainable way, and I am not even saying that one is better than the other, but they have differing frameworks in terms of how to treat your holdings.

If we were going to do the lump sum sale, then yeah, we could do that as a kind of raking technique (something like this) rather than a monthly way of thinking about BTC withdrawals.


200 wma is useful from a trend observation perspective, but absolutely meaningless as a measure of your current liquid wealth.
Say, tomorrow, something incredibly bad or good happens and bitcoin is at 20K or 100K.
Would you still think that your "wealth" in bitcoin is at 31K(200wma)X(your number of bitcoins)?
Of course not, I hope, as you should mark to market and not some imaginary lagging number.
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1801
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 4331
^ You guys over complicate things.
A simpler math (for US only):

FU status=$2mil in cash. Long term cap gains are 23.8 % in US, maximum, so you would need to produce about $2.56 mil in profit from a sale (I tried to account for 0-89.25K 0% tax, 89.25-250K 15% tax no NIIT, 250K-553.8K 15% tax+3.8% NIIT and above 553.8K-20% tax+3.8% NIIT; all for married, filed jointly).

If, for an argument's sake, your cost is very low, then you'll need about 50 BTC to sell in order to achieve the FU status in about an hour using bitcoin alone (with taxes all accounted for). Adjust 50btc to a higher number if your cost is much higher, like above 5K (every 5K increase in your cost= about 10% increase in the number over 50BTC to achieve bitcoin- only fu status; example-if your cost was 20K, then you'll "need" to sell about 81 btc right now to almost insta-achieve fu status by bitcoin alone).

Just look at the spot, where you can sell right now, not some fancy 200WMA.
The spot is where you would be selling in case of a need to cash out to achieve fu or to buy something substantial, like a nice house, a small ranch or a lake  Cheesy.

Well, each one is different. In the end, whatever suits each one of us is the best strategy.

As for selling, are you sure you want to park $2M of fiat in a bank account in one sell? Don't you want to shave off small amounts from your stash as and when required?

A "buy when you can, sell when you must" approach.

Unless you intend to buy something big, like a million-dollar house, etc. In that case, are $2M enough for f.u. status for you? This is not meant to be a "per year" amount, but a "lifetime" amount.

Just saying...

Well, according to the canon, and by that I mean this
video clip from The "Gambler"
....you need a roof over your head (preferably a new one) and 2 mil in the bank, but "in the bank" could be a money market fund, of course.

2 mil is now on the low side, though, I might say. The "new" number is probably around 5 mil (about 100btc, currently).
legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 10832
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
^ You guys over complicate things.
A simpler math (for US only):

FU status=$2mil in cash. Long term cap gains are 23.8 % in US, maximum, so you would need to produce about $2.56 mil in profit from a sale (I tried to account for 0-89.25K 0% tax, 89.25-250K 15% tax no NIIT, 250K-553.8K 15% tax+3.8% NIIT and above 553.8K-20% tax+3.8% NIIT; all for married, filed jointly).

Who is calling the kettle black?

I have no problem with the idea of having an extra tax cushion, but you are still not getting to the essential question regarding any kind of BTC valuation plan that presumes mostly holding the BTC rather than selling it all.

We are not selling all of our BTC, even though we are using our BTC to figure out when we reach entry-level fuck you status.

Sure another thing is that we likely have other assets, but if the only thing that we have is bitcoin and cash then surely we can add in some extra for taxes or other expenses, but if we might be considering withdrawing from $2million at the traditional rates of 4% per year which would be $6,666 per month, then yeah we would have to figure out our tax consequences in the event that might be gross rather than net withdrawal.. I think that many of my presumptions is that we are referring to gross rather than net... but I also think that if you are using 4% as your withdrawal rate then you are likely in a very conservative withdrawal mode and either your BTC can grow a lot more or you could actually withdraw way more than your what you perceive to be your budget since you would only be withdrawing 4%, but the dollar value is much more, even right now it would be close to $11k per month rather than $6,666, since the BTC spot price is 63% above the 200-WMA (using 64 BTC as the current default entry-level fuck you status).

You can see it your lil selfie right here by plugging in the numbers. 

If, for an argument's sake, your cost is very low, then you'll need about 50 BTC to sell in order to achieve the FU status in about an hour using bitcoin alone (with taxes all accounted for).

You are not following.

You are using spot price rather than 200-WMA, like me

And alternatively, you are not using AlcoHoDL's 5x spot price system.. which seems to currently be right around 145 BTC based on the last ATH price of $69k and using $10million as entry-level fuck you status.

Neither of us were suggesting to use BTC spot price to figure out entry-level fuck you status or even to be planning to sell very large portions of our cornz.. as you seem to be suggesting to cash it all out. and then what? suffer with $2million dollars... who the fuck got into bitcoin in order to put it all into dollars?  Yeah, sure there are guys out there who are wanting to do that, but that's not what either AlcoHoDL or I had been getting at..and maybe that's why it is seeming to be overly complicated from your spot price focused perspective.

Adjust 50btc to a higher number if your cost is much higher, like above 5K (every 5K increase in your cost= about 10% increase in the number over 50BTC to achieve bitcoin- only fu status; example-if your cost was 20K, then you'll "need" to sell about 81 btc right now to almost insta-achieve fu status by bitcoin alone).

I am not sure what you are getting at, but yeah selling 81 BTC would get you right around $4.15 million in dollars (gross before taxes), but who is wanting to do that? even if any of us were to have 81 BTC.

Just look at the spot, where you can sell right now, not some fancy 200WMA.

I am not sure how looking at spot fixes anything, especially if we are not cashing out of our BTC from here.  But, hey do what you like.

The spot is where you would be selling in case of a need to cash out to achieve fu or to buy something substantial, like a nice house, a small ranch or a lake  Cheesy.

Of course we sell at spot, and so that could be put in our budget if we might aim for selling a certain amount of bitcoin at certain prices, and that may well be a different strategy to pull out some BTC at various prices versus if we were going to do it in a regular and sustainable way, and I am not even saying that one is better than the other, but they have differing frameworks in terms of how to treat your holdings.

If we were going to do the lump sum sale, then yeah, we could do that as a kind of raking technique (something like this) rather than a monthly way of thinking about BTC withdrawals.

[edited out]
In some sense, all our efforts to predict Bitcoin's value and future status could be moot,

Well one thing could be deciding when to pull the fuck you lever..

And, then the other thing is continuing to make it work while you are in it, and I would hope that we have assets or income sources other than BTC, but that could be part of the reason that we might want to have something like $10 million to serve as our entry-level fuck you status rather than $2 million, even though we might consider $2 million as enough to maintain our standard of living....

Anyone is going to have this as a bit of a dilemma.. because no one is really going to want to end up having to go back to work because he pulled the fuck you status too soon, and then if he is out of work for a few years, he might have trouble getting back into his previous field.. without taking a large pay cut or having to endure a lot more training or whatever.

when we consider the possibility of Bitcoin eventually dominating the entire world monetary system, thus confirming the "0.21 BTC is enough" YouTube video recommendations, which used to be "2.1 BTC is enough", or "21 BTC is enough", a.k.a. One in a Million, if you go way back. Notice how the "sufficient" BTC amount is divided by 10 (an order of magnitude) as we move into the future.

As many WOers would say: 1 BTC = 1 BTC. Just make sure you own some.

Of course, we know that the number of BTC required to reach fuck you status has been ongoingly dropping, and there is nothing really indicating that the trend is going to stop.. so if we have enough of a cushion then we should be good... but at the same time in terms of this thread, there are going to be guys working up to the levels in which they measure their entrance to fuck you status.. and so the same questions regarding how many is enough.. and even though I am saying that 64 is enough right now for the default entry level fuck you status, it is going to take a few years before 21 is going to be enough... right around late 2028, the way it is looking from the fuck you status chart.. that is also very much an estimate that may or may not be accurate.. but we see the trend, I think that there is some reason to have some kind of quasi- (or semi- as you say).. reliance on some of these kinds of formulas, absent some on the ground changes in facts and/or theory that would end up changing our wannabe sorcerer attempts at predictions.

[edited out]
Unless you intend to buy something big, like a million-dollar house, etc. In that case, are $2M enough for f.u. status for you? This is not meant to be a "per year" amount, but a "lifetime" amount.

Just saying...

I also think that once you get to the amount, you may well be able to structure it so that it is still growing with inflation, as long as you have a solid cushion and/or plan which it seems that both you (AlcoHoDL) and I have attempted to account for ongoing BTC volatility so our entry level fuck you status numbers have a lot of cushion and are likely to continue to grow our pots  in order to account for worldly uncertainties... and sometimes we might even figure out that we are too conservative, but that's o.k. as long as we don't end up dying with too much of our wealth (more than we want to have at that point).
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 4576
Addicted to HoDLing!
Quiet at The Wall...
What could it possibly mean?
Calm before the storm?

Glass vs. plastic...
Container ain't the problem,
When drinking poison!

Sam Bankman-Fried jailed.
He looks sexy in those pants.
Careful with that soap...

ECB gone nuts,
Claiming that Bitcoin has failed.
How low can they stoop?

Craig Wright on trial.
His White Paper forgery,
Out, animated!

Bored CAM programmer.
Tool paths turned to shurikens!
Katanas are next.

Did you say "crypto"?
Take your Batslap like a man,
Or be gone, you fool!

#7wodigestsundayhaikus
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1801
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 10832
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"

A beautiful take on as a shuriken I might not be a lover of green but wouldn't Green be better in place of the red.
Since we like interested in shooting greens.

Since you made an artsy-fartsy-feedback statement, I feel inclined to do the same.

I would like both green and red, and I would also like less redundancy.  In other words I do not like the repetition of 2013 and 2024, so if there are going to be 4 edges to the star, then 2013 and 2024 on two of the edges seems appropriate... but then what could go on the other edges?  maybe just blank green?.. or alternating green and red...

but the text cannot be the same. unless there is a green 2013 and a red 2013 and the same would be true for the 2024.. but that still seems redundant in terms of substantive content. .. every 4 years, would be 2013, 2017, 2021 and 2025, but then it would be a future star that anticipates the what's going to come.. something about wannabe sorcerer.

Funny that Bitcoin is also a cryptocurrency.

You must be new here.


 The one on the left is an APNG file.  If you can't see the animation, you're probably using any browser but Brave and Firefox.  That's too bad because you get real transparencies and more colours than you can shake a stick at.  GIF is on the right... but the dithered shadows looked terrible and the text became illegible so I removed both... of course the GIF version I've used has been around for 35 years now.  Wonder what Bitcoin will look like in another 20 years?

It looks like, in part, you already anticipated some aspect of my thinking about the colors. but they probably still would be good to incorporate just the green and the red.. .. yet I am no where near to a "real" artist.

That $150k is pretty damned whimpy...
I hope so man. I think we will see a top of $180,000 to $250,000 some time in 2025.

I don’t think my mind is currently able to compute what I could do with the price any higher than that with my current bitcoin stash.

I think that a lot of us longer timers are not necessarily considering BIG lump sum withdrawals, even though you seem more inclined to some level of lump sum withdrawals.. but if you are already getting to a stage of not knowing what to do with that, then maybe you might need to start some kind of sustainable withdrawal.. I don't consider it to be unreasonable, yet you still seem to be inclined towards some kind of chunking out.. which sure that is all fine and dandy I suppose.. but you are still trying to figure out where to put it..

and yeah, you can hold onto dollars.. let's say that you cash out 20% or 25% or some variation of that.. and so if the price corrects, you just get more bitcoin, but you already feel that you have enough BTC, but then if the price keeps going up, will you have regrets about having had cashed out that many BTC?  ONLY you can answer those kinds of questions.

but yeah, each of us has to probably figure out additional ways to spend, which is maybe a bit outside of what it took for us to get to where we are at.... but if you have good ways to assess your BTC value, then maybe it does not hurt to just put your self on a budget in which you have an extra several thousand a month.. or whatever might be your amount.. and maybe you just put part of your bitcoin holdings into some kind of sustainable withdrawal and the rest just sits there or maybe you play around with that other part by trying to sell and then buy back.. so maybe that would make 3 parts: 1) just hold, 2) sustainable withdrawal and 3) play around.. and you can pick your ratios, so that it is not all or nothing or that you are not too emotionally attached to any portion of what you are doing.. .and personally, I would not want to play around with more than 10%, but some folks might be wiling to allocate 25% or even 33.3% for playing around.

another sunday
nice and flat at 50k
how long will we stay
Not long enough we should be expecting 60k this next weekend. Those 100 pushups really gonna pump the price 😁
$60k is another price target for next month, feel very confident btc will hit that price

$60k is in no man's land, so I have my doubts that it is very accurate to be suggesting that bitcoin is hanging around anywhere between $55k and $82k, even though sure there could end up being some sticking points, yet even if there are some sticking points, it is not a very hanging out place.. . #justsaying #a little friend told me this
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1801
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1891
bitcoin retard
Halving in 51 days, little over 7 weeks.  Shocked

Stop your flatlining sideways, buddy.
...

I must say I'm quite happy with flatlining at 50k+ .... as long as we don't dip around halving like every other cycle

Flatlining after an increase like we just had is just the market going into accumulation mode before the next leg up. I still wouldn’t sell here. Even though everyone is expecting a dip, myself included, it isn’t worth the risk of being left out when the god candle hits.


As Saylor puts it, I wouldn't sell the winner to buy the loser.

Dips are noise / buying opportunities. In BTC you could even say the same thing for bear markets.... although they can be quite exhausting.

Will be interesting where the next dip occurs. But with the recent ETF buying action there might be none until the gox coins get released. And even that might be a nothing burger. Although traders will likely try to sell the news.
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Halving in 51 days, little over 7 weeks.  Shocked

Stop your flatlining sideways, buddy.
...

I must say I'm quite happy with flatlining at 50k+ .... as long as we don't dip around halving like every other cycle

Flatlining after an increase like we just had is just the market going into accumulation mode before the next leg up. I still wouldn’t sell here. Even though everyone is expecting a dip, myself included, it isn’t worth the risk of being left out when the god candle hits.
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1891
bitcoin retard
google's new chess app

hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1891
bitcoin retard
Halving in 51 days, little over 7 weeks.  Shocked

Stop your flatlining sideways, buddy.
...

I must say I'm quite happy with flatlining at 50k+ .... as long as we don't dip around halving like every other cycle
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 2617
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1801
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1884
Verified Bitcoin Hodler
Interrupting Chartbuddy public service.
Observing 51,635@Stamp

Observing Powder as well


It almost looks like someone sprayed blue antifreeze on the snow or something.
Jump to: