Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 8485. (Read 26715952 times)

legendary
Activity: 1464
Merit: 1136
DCA is really the no-brainer no-emotion just-do-it kind of thing. If you can somehow set it on auto pilot, that would be great. That's kinda difficult to do depending on the exchanges you are using and your bank.

There is one that supposedly let's you top up your account using your own bank's bill payment feature, which you should be able to schedule, so it pays or sends the exchange some of your fiat every 2 weeks. On the exchange itself, it executes a buy order once a day until your fiat runs out.
Ya, Bullbitcoin does this and whats even better, it goes directly to my HW. So easy, set and forget. Unfortunately still only available to Canadians.
legendary
Activity: 3962
Merit: 11519
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


Who gives any shits about dumbass and purposefully skewed lines that you draw on a piece of paper for dramatic effects.. you diptwat.
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1688
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
In my opinion it is this:

It is one thing to find an alternative protocol to Bitcoin interesting, or believe in it as an investment.

I don't agree with this view, but people have the right to make choices, even if they ultimately prove to be wrong.  Live and let live.

However, going so far as refusing to condemn the objectively indefensible, places someone beyond the possibility of respect.  A fellow traveler ceases to be a friend, which is a shame.

Craig Wright's lack of principles and honesty is objectively indefensible.  This has been proven in a court of law.  He has lied under oath; it is not unreasonable to conclude he lives a tissue of lies.

When any man is obviously of sound mind and intelligent, but still disregards the obvious and will not condemn this plainly malignant, transparent liar, one can only conclude he is either; as corrupt as the man he defends, too egotistical, or too weak and foolish to look in the mirror and admit that he might be wrong.

And again, you conflate my support of BSV with support of CSW. Just no.

Dashjr has stated it is legitimate to kill all non-xtians. Does that taint all of BTC? No. For the person and the coin are two different things.
legendary
Activity: 2604
Merit: 3056
Welt Am Draht
I'm sure I've said it before, but I'll say it again.

There's nothing wrong with saying aspects of BlockstreamBorgLizardAxaCoreSegShitcoin go against what you initially signed up for and believe in.

What I am amazed at is how few who believe that are capable of stating that the alternative projects that shout this the loudest are clearly pieces of shit that drown many of the principles that it does still work hard to respect in a fountain of shitty shit.

Why is it so painful to acknowledge?

All there needs to be is a quiet and competent chain that does what it says on the tin. If you get rid of the lawsuits, lies, screaming, gaming, endless hard forks and 51% attacks there might actually be some people who are swayed by it.

Hmm. Sounds a bit Litecoin ish but sadly it doesn't have Bitcoin glued to it.
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1688
lose: unfind ... loose: untight

There's no long term plan here, at this point even if he somehow manages to prove that he owns Satoshi's private and gpg keys, i don't see how anyone would want to support a blockchain network with an "owner". BSvers can't be that dumb, or can they

He likes what Satoshi did

He doesn't like what blockCore did to Satoshi 's BitCoin

He might be Satoshi and keeps the trolls running

So far that's cool

 Grin

The issue is that BSv idiots fail to see that no one wants a "decentralized" network with an "owner".

The issue is that anti-BSV idiots fail to see -- notwithstanding CSW's statement quoted above -- that BSV no more has an "owner" than does BTC.

Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain! He's only the chief scientist of the protocol and self proclaimed creator, a patent troll who copyrighted the whitepaper and trying to build a patent forest around the tech, other than that BSv is as decentralized as bitcoin. Keep trying to preach new n00bs in. Even in his best case scenario miners will just go behind tor, then who he's going to sue? But go ahead go fight the internet that always turns out well  Roll Eyes

Correct. BSV is just as decentralized as BTC. Craig's escapades notwithstanding. As they are irrelevant from the standpoint of the protocol and the chain.

Shut the fuck up. You can't be this stupid. At this point you have just become another meme in the long list of idiots who spent their days on this thread trying to bash BTC because they had mental problems or some social hysteria disorder.

Stop embarrassing yourself with your altcoin non-sense. Any idiot who thinks CSW is even potentially satoshi is a moron of the highest order. Like world class idiot.

So just shut the fuck up and go away. No one likes you. I just took you off ignore long enough to rip you another asshole, you asshole.

Aww. You hurt my feelings.  Roll Eyes

You ineffectual idiot. I ain't goin' nowheres. Deal.
legendary
Activity: 3962
Merit: 11519
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
Usually, it is better to buy on the way down rather than on the way up.. but maybe the price will keep going up.

I’m going to disagree somewhat on this point. It doesn’t matter what direction the price is moving when you buy, so long as your sell above that price.  

That's true, too.

I am a little embarrassed, but I remember in November 2015, I had just started my system to sell BTC on the way up and buy on the way down.. , and that selling started around $250 ... so as the BTC price got to about $400 without giving me any opportunity to buy back, I got a bit frustrated and I stopped selling, as my system told me I was supposed to do, and then when the price went up to $500, I fucking blew a decently large amount of my reserve cash and I bought, so when the price corrected back to $300 and then kind of got stuck between $375 and $425 for nearly 7 months, I was kicking myself for most of that time for buying so much at $500 and kind of locking myself out from trading for nearly 7months.  

Yeah, i figured out a way around it, including the ability to use some fresh cash as it was coming in, and yeah it was not the end of the world, because 7 months later the price went shooting above my $500 buying price and never really returned.. but still, felt kind of like a loser for 7 months and screwed up some opportunity costs.. which was largely a result of my letting my emotions to allow myself to do the opposite of what I had already told myself that I was going to do.
legendary
Activity: 2604
Merit: 1748
In my opinion it is this:

It is one thing to find an alternative protocol to Bitcoin interesting, or believe in it as an investment.

I don't agree with this view, but people have the right to make choices, even if they ultimately prove to be wrong.  Live and let live.

However, going so far as refusing to condemn the objectively indefensible, places someone beyond the possibility of respect.  A fellow traveler ceases to be a friend, which is a shame.

Craig Wright's lack of principles and honesty is objectively indefensible.  This has been proven in a court of law.  He has lied under oath; it is not unreasonable to conclude he lives a tissue of lies.

When any man is obviously of sound mind and intelligent, but still disregards the obvious and will not condemn this plainly malignant, transparent liar, one can only conclude he is either; as corrupt as the man he defends, too egotistical, or too weak and foolish to look in the mirror and admit that he might be wrong.
legendary
Activity: 3962
Merit: 11519
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"

A lot of revisionary history going on there with the sorcerer wannabe, aka lambie bambie.

Don't worry, Lambie.  People, in these here parts, still seem to like you, even if you don't know nuttin.

legendary
Activity: 1795
Merit: 1208
This is not OK.

Correct. BSV is just as decentralized as BTC. Craig's escapades notwithstanding. As they are irrelevant from the standpoint of the protocol and the chain.

Shut the fuck up. You can't be this stupid. At this point you have just become another meme in the long list of idiots who spent their days on this thread trying to bash BTC because they had mental problems or some social hysteria disorder.

Stop embarrassing yourself with your altcoin non-sense. Any idiot who thinks CSW is even potentially satoshi is a moron of the highest order. Like world class idiot.

So just shut the fuck up and go away. No one likes you. I just took you off ignore long enough to rip you another asshole, you asshole.

Don't sit on the fence, tell us how you really feel!


Correct. BSV is just as decentralized as BTC. Craig's escapades notwithstanding. As they are irrelevant from the standpoint of the protocol and the chain.

The USA doesn’t have a president if you disregard Trump

I was thinking along the same lines Cheesy

legendary
Activity: 1442
Merit: 2282
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist

There's no long term plan here, at this point even if he somehow manages to prove that he owns Satoshi's private and gpg keys, i don't see how anyone would want to support a blockchain network with an "owner". BSvers can't be that dumb, or can they

He likes what Satoshi did

He doesn't like what blockCore did to Satoshi 's BitCoin

He might be Satoshi and keeps the trolls running

So far that's cool

 Grin

The issue is that BSv idiots fail to see that no one wants a "decentralized" network with an "owner".

The issue is that anti-BSV idiots fail to see -- notwithstanding CSW's statement quoted above -- that BSV no more has an "owner" than does BTC.

Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain! He's only the chief scientist of the protocol and self proclaimed creator, a patent troll who copyrighted the whitepaper and trying to build a patent forest around the tech, other than that BSv is as decentralized as bitcoin. Keep trying to preach new n00bs in. Even in his best case scenario miners will just go behind tor, then who he's going to sue? But go ahead go fight the internet that always turns out well  Roll Eyes

Correct. BSV is just as decentralized as BTC. Craig's escapades notwithstanding. As they are irrelevant from the standpoint of the protocol and the chain.

The USA doesn’t have a president if you disregard Trump
hv_
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale

There's no long term plan here, at this point even if he somehow manages to prove that he owns Satoshi's private and gpg keys, i don't see how anyone would want to support a blockchain network with an "owner". BSvers can't be that dumb, or can they

He likes what Satoshi did

He doesn't like what blockCore did to Satoshi 's BitCoin

He might be Satoshi and keeps the trolls running

So far that's cool

 Grin

The issue is that BSv idiots fail to see that no one wants a "decentralized" network with an "owner".

The issue is that anti-BSV idiots fail to see -- notwithstanding CSW's statement quoted above -- that BSV no more has an "owner" than does BTC.

Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain! He's only the chief scientist of the protocol and self proclaimed creator, a patent troll who copyrighted the whitepaper and trying to build a patent forest around the tech, other than that BSv is as decentralized as bitcoin. Keep trying to preach new n00bs in. Even in his best case scenario miners will just go behind tor, then who he's going to sue? But go ahead go fight the internet that always turns out well  Roll Eyes

Correct. BSV is just as decentralized as BTC. Craig's escapades notwithstanding. As they are irrelevant from the standpoint of the protocol and the chain.

Shut the fuck up. You can't be this stupid. At this point you have just become another meme in the long list of idiots who spent their days on this thread trying to bash BTC because they had mental problems or some social hysteria disorder.

Stop embarrassing yourself with your altcoin non-sense. Any idiot who thinks CSW is even potentially satoshi is a moron of the highest order. Like world class idiot.

So just shut the fuck up and go away. No one likes you. I just took you off ignore long enough to rip you another asshole, you asshole.

Wow, strong shit and triggered?

Grow up and learn to chill
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070

There's no long term plan here, at this point even if he somehow manages to prove that he owns Satoshi's private and gpg keys, i don't see how anyone would want to support a blockchain network with an "owner". BSvers can't be that dumb, or can they

He likes what Satoshi did

He doesn't like what blockCore did to Satoshi 's BitCoin

He might be Satoshi and keeps the trolls running

So far that's cool

 Grin

The issue is that BSv idiots fail to see that no one wants a "decentralized" network with an "owner".

The issue is that anti-BSV idiots fail to see -- notwithstanding CSW's statement quoted above -- that BSV no more has an "owner" than does BTC.

Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain! He's only the chief scientist of the protocol and self proclaimed creator, a patent troll who copyrighted the whitepaper and trying to build a patent forest around the tech, other than that BSv is as decentralized as bitcoin. Keep trying to preach new n00bs in. Even in his best case scenario miners will just go behind tor, then who he's going to sue? But go ahead go fight the internet that always turns out well  Roll Eyes

Correct. BSV is just as decentralized as BTC. Craig's escapades notwithstanding. As they are irrelevant from the standpoint of the protocol and the chain.

Shut the fuck up. You can't be this stupid. At this point you have just become another meme in the long list of idiots who spent their days on this thread trying to bash BTC because they had mental problems or some social hysteria disorder.

Stop embarrassing yourself with your altcoin non-sense. Any idiot who thinks CSW is even potentially satoshi is a moron of the highest order. Like world class idiot.

So just shut the fuck up and go away. No one likes you. I just took you off ignore long enough to rip you another asshole, you asshole.
hero member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 755
Homo Sapiens Bitcoinerthalensis
The issue is that anti-BSV idiots fail to see -- notwithstanding CSW's statement quoted above -- that BSV no more has an "owner" than does BTC.

In theory maybe.
In reality, you have to be fucking joking.

Oh and, can you make your dog shut the fuck up, please?
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1688
lose: unfind ... loose: untight

There's no long term plan here, at this point even if he somehow manages to prove that he owns Satoshi's private and gpg keys, i don't see how anyone would want to support a blockchain network with an "owner". BSvers can't be that dumb, or can they

He likes what Satoshi did

He doesn't like what blockCore did to Satoshi 's BitCoin

He might be Satoshi and keeps the trolls running

So far that's cool

 Grin

The issue is that BSv idiots fail to see that no one wants a "decentralized" network with an "owner".

The issue is that anti-BSV idiots fail to see -- notwithstanding CSW's statement quoted above -- that BSV no more has an "owner" than does BTC.

Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain! He's only the chief scientist of the protocol and self proclaimed creator, a patent troll who copyrighted the whitepaper and trying to build a patent forest around the tech, other than that BSv is as decentralized as bitcoin. Keep trying to preach new n00bs in. Even in his best case scenario miners will just go behind tor, then who he's going to sue? But go ahead go fight the internet that always turns out well  Roll Eyes

Correct. BSV is just as decentralized as BTC. Craig's escapades notwithstanding. As they are irrelevant from the standpoint of the protocol and the chain.
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4393
Be a bank
legendary
Activity: 2833
Merit: 1851
In order to dump coins one must have coins

There's no long term plan here, at this point even if he somehow manages to prove that he owns Satoshi's private and gpg keys, i don't see how anyone would want to support a blockchain network with an "owner". BSvers can't be that dumb, or can they

He likes what Satoshi did

He doesn't like what blockCore did to Satoshi 's BitCoin

He might be Satoshi and keeps the trolls running

So far that's cool

 Grin

The issue is that BSv idiots fail to see that no one wants a "decentralized" network with an "owner".

The issue is that anti-BSV idiots fail to see -- notwithstanding CSW's statement quoted above -- that BSV no more has an "owner" than does BTC.

Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain! He's only the chief scientist of the protocol and self proclaimed creator, a patent troll who copyrighted the whitepaper and trying to build a patent forest around the tech, other than that BSv is as decentralized as bitcoin. Keep trying to preach new n00bs in. Even in his best case scenario miners will just go behind tor, then who he's going to sue? But go ahead go fight the internet that always turns out well  Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1045
Hi, sorry to be so offtopic in here but....

Did anyone catch when that 400 bitcoin sell wall was removed from bitstamp?
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1688
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
Many companies decide to pull out of the #MobileWorldCongress event in Barcelona due the rapid spread of the #coronavirus.

There is no harm in making sure your supplies are up to date. Call it a practise drill if you prefer. Get a months's worth of basic supplies together for all pets and people in your household. Do it right now.

Don't forget water. For most of the developed world's populace, water is (((their))) greatest tool of control.
hv_
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale

There's no long term plan here, at this point even if he somehow manages to prove that he owns Satoshi's private and gpg keys, i don't see how anyone would want to support a blockchain network with an "owner". BSvers can't be that dumb, or can they

He likes what Satoshi did

He doesn't like what blockCore did to Satoshi 's BitCoin

He might be Satoshi and keeps the trolls running

So far that's cool

 Grin

The issue is that BSv idiots fail to see that no one wants a "decentralized" network with an "owner". The tech is out and people saw the benefit and value in the decentralized network. That's like if coca cola was still trying to force people to drink it to treat drug dependence, or viagra still insisted it was used to treat heart problems, or listerine to treat gonorrhea. No one cares what the original intent was, but i guess those that don't remember history are doomed...

Bitcoin is a protocol.

It just gets used if it works fine.

Nothing to sell here, like Segwit or LN.
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1688
lose: unfind ... loose: untight

There's no long term plan here, at this point even if he somehow manages to prove that he owns Satoshi's private and gpg keys, i don't see how anyone would want to support a blockchain network with an "owner". BSvers can't be that dumb, or can they

He likes what Satoshi did

He doesn't like what blockCore did to Satoshi 's BitCoin

He might be Satoshi and keeps the trolls running

So far that's cool

 Grin

The issue is that BSv idiots fail to see that no one wants a "decentralized" network with an "owner".

The issue is that anti-BSV idiots fail to see -- notwithstanding CSW's statement quoted above -- that BSV no more has an "owner" than does BTC.
Jump to: