Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 8805. (Read 26609723 times)

I literally used as key words, meta drama.



TOAA vs infofront

Sooo....the unscientific charts say, even if we were to bottom out here and go sideways, we wouldn't see a breakout until February.  

#HODLON2URBTC

Just a nice exercise on the thumb scrolling and scrolling and scrolling... 

I honestly don't know wtf is going on in here, but i sure hope there isn't meta drama spilling into this thread 

^
Daaaaamn what have we brought into this nice thread......

Bob’s been mining since about 2011 you spastic. He’s got more bitcoin’s than you’ve had rapings by your Uncle as a child (which is hundreds).

He doesn’t wear a sig & posts in here don’t count towards sig campaigns any way.

How about the new ones?
Boy I'm sure happy to see you here.


Promise?

#


Our very own, Hat Observer!

#

Spoke too soon...

You are the moron.  Bitcoin is not only the first truly finite currency, it is actually the only truly finite commodity a human can own other than time.  It also has a 100% known schedule as to it's finite property.  ~85% of it has been minted, and there is only be ~15% to go.  Gold on the other hand has a constant flow, and new previous unknown sources are being discovered.  In a single asteroid there could be enough gold to CRUSH the economy of the world and render gold itself worthless.  There is one SINGLE asteroid that holds quintrillions of USD value by today's gold prices.  And we don't even need to go to outer space to discover more gold.  Mining technology will eventually allow us to collect much more gold than we can today from the Earth.

Bitcoin is finite.  And the only way to "create more" of it is to divide it further.  Adding digits to the RIGHT of the decimal point is fundamentally diametric to how we have seen the expansion of the monetary supply in the past by adding digits to the left.  Bitcoin forces us to the other side.  This will change the world in ways that are hard to imagine.  This too is an entirely novel concept, and very much not Keynesian.

And before you start talking about hard forks... no.  There is no evidence that these can be successful apart from bitcoin.  In fact I would say BCH and BSV are only temporarily borrowing value from BTC.  Even in some satanic universe where one of them won, that asset would be the survivor.   It is most likely that one POW asset will survive.  And it is most likely it is Bitcoin.

Just because Bitcoin is a virtual collectable does not mean it's value is nothing.  Just like gold it's monetary value is well beyond it's base value.  It's just in the case of Bitcoin that it's monetary value is it's ENTIRE value.  This too is novel, and quite interesting.  The idea that the physical aspect of gold is what really matters is incorrect.  It is gold's monetary value that is where it's real value lies.

Bitcoin takes that truth to the purest end.

The fact that you cannot, or will not see this is too bad.  But it also makes me happy.  

Tell rick to relax that fist...then you can perhaps contain yourself in future you washed up mess.

Next time don't come to someone elses threads who merely presents observable instances of the boards history and start screaming your homo erotic fantasies and swearing at them. Then start crying when you get some blowback you fucking wussy gimp.
Got it.

Tell your your butt buddies here to give each other reach arounds in private.

All the people in here with no bitcoins worrying about where it is heading next is funny. Going up long term is all you need to know about it. 222222 posts from 100 ppl giving each other reach arounds and splattering humor that is toe curling everywhere. YUCK.

Try having some bitcoins, worrying about the potential value of your sig spamming dust is pathetic.

What's up with that nonsense meta drama that somehow has transpired into our oasis?

... Or maybe should I just grab some popcorn and enjoy?

... or maybe even go full retard into it? (P.S.: I am tempted TBH)

JJG claim he EDITED OUT nutildahs post because .....errr reasons. LOL yeah like you wanted to make it appear I just pulled that list up on my own. He presented that LIST in his link as evidence of bob paying up after he says he will. That is the point of him posting it there. We had no knowledge of any list or any interest. It was only when we noticed several names on that list were leaving red trust that it stood out.

Nutildahs post implied and was presented as evidence of bob being trustworthy??? Why nutildah post a list of people bob has said he would pay or shout for a party as proof of being trustworthy if it had not happened.

He is implying that.

You deleted nutildahs post because you want it to appear that I randomly made that up. FUCKING SNEAKY

You don't also note that nutildah does not even deny it he just says that was a year earlier. I NOTICE ALSO YOU did not note that was correct after nutildah pointed it out IMMEDIATELY and quote the old version your quote does not reflect that post since about 5 mins after it was made. Since that was done with in minutes you must have been lurking there.

So your ONLY valid gripe could be we should not have taken nutildahs implication as true without investigating it. THAT IS IT. Nothing deceptive about it. Names on the LIST NUTILDAH linked to were appearing on trust list leaving red BEFORE we mentioned it. Since it was noted it was a year before then that already nulled the CONNECTION with any possible financial reward. You are pretending that our post still implies this. That is sneaky too since about 5 mins after it was said to be a year earlier it was ALTERED to not even make that possible connection. Hence the time machine post and the adaption on our post.

It does not AT ALL invalidate the rest of the thread. That is based upon independently verifiable observable instances. If you want to claim this I will create a thread where I will pull you weak ass arguments and excuses to pieces ... YES OR NO want that thread ?? YES OR NO?

I bet we get a lot of excuse from JJG now and he will not have a thread just me and him debating the original trust abuse from bbl. JUST YOU AND ME JJG you sneaky little scammer supporting pleb.

What you give or do not give a fuck about is of no concern of mine you non achieving fucking loser. You're nothing here on this board and nothing would have been any different if you had never joined. Got it you servile scammers supporting pleb??

Good now that is sorted out you sneaky peace of shit. We can all discuss bitcoins price direction. Not listen to your slanted and sneaky accounts of events where you like to prevent the full context being presented.

Anyway come to a thread YOU AND ME JJG you waste of board space and debate the entire debacle from the start or stfu you sneaky cunt.

I'm not really seeing anything drastic (upwards bitcoin price) until well into new year now.

Noice!

I think it has been long ago since I stopped congratulate you for your good job and commitment to avoid being repetitive but.. hmmmm, good fucking job!

And nice new hat too.

He's gone Dabs, For now....

Sigs are not counted or even shown in this thread.

Didn't checked it out yet, but make sure the origin of the HAT-story is on the page

Will check out shortly, just a few things I gotta do now ...

I bought the domain www wohats com is already configured and working.

I hope you like the new design, the background wall I think is perfect.

Don't be lazy and send your threads , this will add more value to the blog.

In the future, hats will be part of the history of Bitcointalk and Bitcoin.

www.wohats.com

hmmmmmmmmm

trying for the breakout option I see

Yada yada yada ... this Bitcoin price action reminds me of sometime not so long ago in a currency far far away.

Disclaimer:buying da dips burning da Manips

There is likely a governmental conspiracy here to inspire suicidal actions of WO Bitcoin HODLers.