Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 8807. (Read 26609723 times)

LOL like 99% of our posts are not made in a self moderated environment you sneaky scumbag. Why edit out nutildahs post then??? yes because you see he is implying that bob followed through on his promise to pay that list out. Not that it really matters at all to the central point that bob was in the wrong originally.

Good luck defending the fact you are a moron. Why cut away his post when he brought that posts as a reference for bob being reliable financially? post  the entire thing you twat we never heard of that list before he presented it as evidence of presumably someone following through on their financial promise. What you think we randomly found that list and used it as evidence ?? nutildah posted it , then moments after we made our post he never said it was incorrect he said it was 1 year not 2 days ago. We accepted that. He never said actually bob never really paid them out or paid for their party place. Got it.

Sorry but that all looks very off topic and inaccurate mr  non achieving servile dreg.

Can you present some substantive posts that have been deleted by us...looks like a false allegation. The only posts deleted were those that did not adhere to the rule in the initial post.

Anyway thanks for the warm welcome. This thread appears Unmoderated. I mean just glancing through it there seems no structure at all it seems more like a free for all. However sure we will be keeping to the topic and only replying to strictly other peoples comments.

I mean I can create a thread for you to come and explain you allegations if you like? Anything we originally presented as a statement of fact will be indeed a fact. Unless you can prove otherwise. Now stfu and get back to discussing the movement of bitcoin you trumped up little twat mr non achiever. Never heard of you in all these years. Precisely because you never achieved anything LOL

Anyway guys bitcoins price bouncing up a little hopefully... good for for all those legendary members that still need to rely on the btc dust from their sig spamming.

Great to see all the old faces faeces in here.

christ nutella

Good luck defending your stupid-ass lil selfie in this thread, where you cannot delete all and any substantive post that goes against your lil propaganda bullshit schemes.  

You will be lucky if you are not completely deleted here if you are just cluttering this thread with irrelevant nonsense and also ongoing misrepresentations of facts (and made up "facts") that are based on sketchy logic (if any), which is your MO in your various self-moderated propaganda spreading threads.

TLDR:  In other words, as shown by your own lame/disingenuous behaviors, the only "sneaky" one is you.

I want to see this candle in green at the end of this 2019  


Source: https://twitter.com/ChartsBtc/status/1202975974129713153

me too... 

LOL

[edited out] nutildahs posts sneaky cunt.

What are talking about you fool. Nuttildah brought this claim to our thread. Why would you need to come into contact with us you twat. The list is what nutildah references as evidence of bob following through on his promises. JJG cut nutildahs post away for extra sneakyness. Nutildah commented moments after we made the post and said it was one year ago not 2 days. He never said you were not paid or got the party position paid.

He is implying you either got the money or you got a party shouted for you.

If he is using that as as evidence of bob going through with his promises then you need to take that up with him.


Blame him for quoting this as evidence of bob being trustworthy and reliable. If you got neither then that is not my problem. You have a right to deny it, end of. I have edited the post to say the list is inaccurate now.  Nutildah only says it was one year ago not 2 days. He never says that payment or party place didn't take place does he?

Anyway glad to be here now looks like a great place to hangout.

Another way of visualising it, with all the other CB's included:

How?
I see everything is very sooth @ $7,405

You must be in the same pie in the sky, detached from reality, fantasyland thinking as jupiter9 and _javi_ then, cAPSLOCK...   


See my earlier responses to such nonsense.  I won't requote it here to reduce wall of text sizenings, per my recent unwilling subliminal brainwashenings.

Its OK, they can quit any time they want, a little recreational liquidity never hurt anyone.

Panic mode activated

Good afternoon WO!
Observing @ $7,407

Still waiting for LFC's Vegeta 🤪

You are breaking Bob's opsec.

Something not right about that.   

He’s talking about that ass hole The-One-Above-All in Meta JJG.

https://twitter.com/davthewave/status/1202841536326598656

I see an excess of comments and graphics in the bearish direction, I still see bears and bulls fighting to stay +/- $ 7,400, we could see $ 7,000 or less, but I am inclined to think that we are closer to a green dildo in the direction of $ 8,000 sorry, I don't agree with the vast majority.

BTCullish

...

NAILED that one (just above, #511300 last page) exactly right, LUCKMCFLY.  My greater family has had quite a string of cancer deaths in recent years.

*   *   *

Banks and Equifax are some real enemies of unwary people.  HODLing assets outside the financial system only makes sense.  

r0ach deserves some credit for that as well as all of you, physical Au is also outside the financial system.  Precious metals and BTC are natural and complementary allies.  And their prices are somewhat independent of each other, hence complementary.  YES, I did see the chart showing the (weak, IMO) correlation of prices of BTC vs. Gold.  "The academics" use a rule of thumb that a correlation of 0.30 is "significant".  That above chart (I'll go back and hunt it down and EDIT this post in a bit) shows BTC & Au always less than 0.30, and showed NEGATIVE correlation for some time.  Seems to me, amateur statistics guy, pretty independent of each other.


EDIT: Should have known is what LUCKMCFLY who posted that interesting chart showing correlation of BTC and Au (#511281, last page).  Note that if you look at the "area under the curve" (a la integral calculus), you will see that adding up all those low correlations comes to near zero, close enough for the correlation to be be, effectively, near ZERO at least IMO. 

BTC and gold act independently of each other, at least for now.  If Hong Kong gets slaughtered by the Commie Reds, that of course could change quickly...

Overall, I think that you are correct about the earliest of bitcoin adopters throwing around coins as if they did not have much if any value, and largely it was true, they did not have a lot of value - so part of the solution, including ideas of liquidity was that adoption had to be increased and/or expanded, otherwise the HODLers of coins would have no place to either cash out or to spend their coins.

Might also show that some of the real BIG coin HODLers may not have been as generous as people thought them to be, including Roger Ver, who held a shitload of coins in the early days, that were worth millions on paper, but he did not have many places to be able to cash them out.

One thing about Roger that makes his seem as such an idiot to so many of the other bitcoin HODLers is that he seems to be stuck on that same mode of thinking - and doubled down on stagnant views that seem to have been applicable in the past.  To the extent that he is genuine and has not been bought off or coerced by some kind of government entity for his ongoing attacks on bitcoin, he also turned his own perspective into some kind of taking matters personally, but then his attack vector also turned into a way for him to make money off of dumb and unsound principles.. so i supposed he doubled down on dumb to some degree, and could take a while to part him from his money because he has found ways to make some of the dumb short-term profitable. 

Regarding BTC price movement, I keep hoping to see bitcoin's price move up while altcoins are stagnant or even going down, and that does not seem to be happening, so these kinds of abilities to continue to hang onto the coattails of bitcoin seem confusing to me - even while I understand that whatever next UPpity BTC price move we get could also continue to allow some of the shitcoins to pump more than bitcoin, and long term BTC HODLers might well be able to continue to understand that it is better to just stay with bitcoin, there are likely going to be a lot of folks continuing to be tempted into various shitcoins (which ones will do better is still hard to figure out and which ones that might go completely and quickly bust, or "tulips" like searing likes to say, is still in the to-be-determined category).

Fully in accordance with Plan B...





Source: https://twitter.com/100trillionUSD/status/1202948823460524032