Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 8915. (Read 26608296 times)

 Thank you VB1001 - that is beautiful.

Masterluc's chart from nearly one year ago showed the price dipping to about the $6,500 level around this time, as a sort of final capitulation before the rocket takes off.

If you choose to mix your on-line and your personal life then that is a choice that you make, and surely you have discretion regarding how you want to do it.

Still there are opsec issues, and there are a decently large number of folks who prefer not to roll like that... and maybe sooner or later, these real life encounters are going to cause a decently large number of the encounters to become public faces in the bitcoin space, whether initially wanted to be the case or not.  

If you are willing to take chances that you might become a publicly known person in the space, then of course, you can do that and many people prefer NOT to have such a life, even though there are a lot of publicly known people in the bitcoin space, and they likely have decent lives and they may or may not have intended to go down such a road... Actually, there are people who started out having an online persona that later became public, and whether they are happy about it or not, frequently it will be harder to undo something like that than to do it.  

So all good and fun if several of you want to juggle with these chainsaws, and it is all fun and games until someone's eye gets poked out.

So, even though you have a preference to potentially go public or potentially screw up your opsec, stop trying to suggest that everyone should be making the same kinds of opsec decisions, because that is pure irresponsible to be suggesting such norms, when the world does not work like that, especially in a space in which there could be decently high risks to screwing up OPsec in unwitting ways and NOT properly personally assessing some of the negative consequences of either purposefully or accidentally creating Opsec holes.



Does it matter?  Are you attempting to suggest that there is more validity to coming out as either a public person or a quasi-public person?  Are you trying to suggest that members or lesser if they choose to attempt to exercise meaningful Opsec?  

Get real, and again, it is a bit irritating if you are trying to suggest that your chosen level of Opsec (or lacking thereof, or choices to share your relative lack of opsec) is preferable, merely because you believe that you are getting value from it and other peeps that you met in real life that happen to be WO members are also perceiving themselves to getting value from these kinds of mixing the meat space engagement decisions.

I know, but they are all made by xhomerx10

Modified spelling size error, now it is correct.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53122427

I have to admit first, that I am not a trader and I don't understand everything completely. Here are my questions and thoughts related to your frequent posts of bitmex liquidations. What is the relation between bitmex and the price of Bitcoin? In particular, why do you think that a liquidation of a long position precedes a dump in the price (which is implied by your post)? As far as I know, Bitmex is a derivate exchange and some contracts are cash settled, others physically, but I have no clue what portion is each. On the other hand, if there is an option for short/long positions involving real bitcoins that have to be sold/bought to cover/close the positions on the major exchanges like bitfinex and binance (I think they have their own short/long game looking at https://blockchainwhispers.com/bitmex-position-calculator/#), this may affect the price. But I don't see why the traders on the major exchanges will be influenced by what is going on on CME, bakkt, bitmex, etc. These futures and leverage tradings are like roulette - the player vs the house. Unless some manipulator dumps first on bitstamp, coinbase and kraken (which form the price index of Bitmex), I don't see any other connection with the price. And in that case, first is the pump or dump, then the closing of long/short positions, not the reverse. Or I miss something?

@VB1001 Nice .... Will merit later, though VOD is a never used he’s HAT guy, though he liked the design

I've made a presentation with all the hats, I know it's not a spectacular design , but all the hats are there.
We had to be all the WO,s present in the "10th anniversary art contest".

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53122427

But then again.... people have met me, but who of my team did they met with @JJG?? 

Finally we are talking about the moon again.  If we can get a train, and a Spartan we might just pull through this mess...  Also a banjo?

But only 1 Globb0

Btw hope you had a safe and good travel back .....

Ok to the next one ....

*actually I do remember one thing our dear JJG told me one time .... complaining a bit towards me and said like, Mic don’t act like any are RL friends of you, they are only “online persona’s” , damn he should know how strong this BTC-community truly is, he would be amazed 

I have gets to known some awesome people here that have became friends IRL.

Institutional buyers will come and fill the bag 🤪

What happens when if it goes below that bottom line? 

Feary teary lemon dreary?

A gentleman with such dedication as to drive a few hours to meet me is humbling.

It was a huge pleasure.

Haarlem is still beautiful. And sunny the day you came. 

2 WO Members here   /\

My main issues with your posts remains your references to a kind of "inevitability" when we are talking about the future.  Yeah, of course there are cycles, and we can see the cycles, and the only inevitability about cycles is after they have already happened.  If we are talking about the future, then we may or may not get a cycle that happens in the direction or the amount that you expect; however, after such cycle happens, then looking back on it historically, then it all makes sense.

What are you talking about 193 days to $10.8k?  I remember less than 90 days from $4,200 to $13,800... that seems to be a whole hell of a lot more important than some interim numbers of the back and forths.  I also remember $7,300 to $10,300 in 12 hours.

In other words, any supposed 193 days to $10.8k to the extent that it is important at all seems to be just one historical factor, and maybe that is why everyone forgot it... because it is not very important in the whole scheme of things unless you are trying to paint some kind of nonsensical and selective dynamics in order to spread misinformation about ongoing actual / real dynamics and BTC price pressures.

hahahahahaha

All of the reluctant love I am feeling because of the webtricks algorithm...



By the way, I am the girl in this meme.... 

Well here is the other side,



It was 193 days that took us to have a gain of $10.8k+ and seems like everyone forgot that!

It's a cycle and it's going to repeat but the good think is that the cycle is moving upwards.

Still a long way to go...

I love to read JJG's posts, so the algorithm worked fine in my case!

WTF?  I have not seen anything close to $6.5k, yet, except for a bunch of dumbass naysayers asserting that such BTC prices are inevitable... which most of us, here, should realize that inevitability is not really in BTC vocabulary, unless you are referring to a kind of likely ongoing adoption that inevitably results in upwards BTC price pressures, due to scarcity.. blah blah blah.

Through rain or shine, just keep on stackin' sats. I may not reap the benefit but my kids and theirs will, someone's gotta build the future and it might as well be us.