Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 8918. (Read 26608336 times)

Thanks akhjob!!!

The above-linked response seems to have largely addressed the earlier criticisms as hyperbolic exaggerations, so in that regard, grin/mimblewimble is far from dead, yet.

Fair enough, and it would be good to get as many of the bugs out of it as possible during the early days, and if it has some irreconcilable technical issues, then maybe its obituary can be written to be able to move on, if there is nothing salvageable, perhaps?


Of course, anyone can choose or not to report any post, and I was more than willing to bear the inconvenience of many of the posts; however, here we have a situation that seems reportable, and such posts should be removed - banned members should NOT be able to post here.  Otherwise I agree with you that compliance with forum rules is not very onerous for quasi-normal peeps.


ok.  Great.


Whenever you are  not really sure about something, the most logical place to start would be the beginning.



Alternatively, you can just attempt to remember where you last saw your keys, and go there.

Nothing will come of it, however...


https://cointelegraph.com/news/us-sec-takes-another-look-at-rejected-bitwise-bitcoin-etf-proposal

Now try this
https://medium.com/grin-mimblewimble/factual-inaccuracies-of-breaking-mimblewimbles-privacy-model-8063371839b9

Mimblewimble is a protocol it could have been used to create private sidechains.



Just the fact it is a Trusted setup makes it a no go, Zcrap is proof people do not do any due diligence whatsoever.



It's not that important (I don't care if thats how he wants it to be[he could easily get back by following the simple ass rules]), I just don't want to hear it so the ignore works for me but then when i get attributed his words in a fucked up quote I want that shit fixed.

The resizing did the trick.


Now back to trying to find out where the hell i was in this thread!

I've been looking the same way, what I got was that it was dated November 15 of this year ...

I followed the sources: https://www.kitco.com/
                                  https://www.kitco.com/news/video/show/Kitco-NEWS/2612/2019-11-15/The-gold-versus-bitcoin-debate-is-still-on-expert-says-$20k -is-in-the-cards-but-for-which # _48_INSTANCE_puYLh9Vd66QY_ = https% 3A% 2F% 2Fwww.kitco.com% 2Fnews% 2Fvideo% 2Flatest% 3Fshow% 3DKitco-NEWS

                                  https://investorshub.advfn.com/

It is really strange ..

eeeeeeeewwwwwwwww        Mr. Tough guy, aka Hueristic.  Can I get a fist bump from your highness?




 

BTW... I had to resize the earlier memes to be visible because they are part of the message context, herein.


I started to report the posts of THX1138 - since there seems to be a pattern of a ban evasion going on here. Banned members should not be able to go through other members to post responses here, which would cause THX1138 and anyone else who engages in such conduct to be attempting to evade a ban.

I was puzzled by the context of the statement because the interview seemed current, but the statements about going to $6k seemed quite a bit off.  I spent a decent amount of time perusing the article and various webpages including the comments on the YouTube page, and no one seemed to have mentioned it... so it still remains a bit of a puzzle for me concerning exactly when that interview actually took place and yeah it may have been uploaded much later than when it took place, perhaps?

To date, your possibly quasi-"friendly fork," xhomerx10 wannabe snakeoils salesman, aka madnessteat has made a few 10th anniversary hats (and submissions to the contest).   Does that stir your creative juices?  

There's a lot of Ethereum tards posting on Twitter now claiming that money is "a social construct".  Yea...no.  If you claim money is a social construct, all you're doing is promoting the legitimacy of things like the Jewish Federal Reserve note.  Money is not a social construct.  Currencies are a social construct, but not money, which is required to be a physical commodity resource.  Resources are not social constructs.  They achieve value through merit of their own usefulness and not just opinion or deception.

Currencies are worthless confidence game scams (Ethereum, Federal Reserve note, Bitcoin) which seek to achieve relevance through this 'social construct' side channel attack.  The attack occasionally works temporarily, but always implodes back to zero on a long enough timeline.  In a tri-metal system of gold, silver, and copper in the present day, free of manipulation and deception, it's possible, or even probable, the market caps of silver and copper might evolve to be higher than that of gold due to offering higher utility as resources.

In the old days, a similar effect seemed to happen with silver constantly encroaching upon gold's value until it was manipulated back down.  For instance, silver had higher liquidity than gold because it was used more in day to day use, and since it's easier to buy a loaf of bread with smaller denomination silver than large denomination gold, silver actually had more utility in this manner.  If you bring an ounce of gold to the baker and he can't make change, it's utility is effectively zero.  Fast forward to today and there are now several workarounds to the divisbility issue, but both silver and copper's intrinsic commodity usefulness has blown way past gold, so it's possible their monetary market caps could also reflect that in the future.

Maybe mimblewimble will have some technologies that fold into bitcoin?  There are also privacy developments that seem to exist through lightning network, Schnoor signatures and taproot, to my understanding. 

I do recall some tokens being issued related to mimblewimble, grin which had been a change of plans, when originally they were going to build on bitcoin, they later decided to create and launch some tokens.

So yeah, I am not sure how "prudently" connected are such projects, and of course, we are going to expect some failures and challenges regarding a variety of these efforts which should cause us to be satisified that they are sufficiently separated from bitcoin, at least currently.

I'm, not sure you got the joke but i'm quite sure your incapable of hurting my feelings.





Ooohh, I havn't heard this one but I like.


PM'd  you need to fix this quote. BTW, THX 1138 has been ignored forever FYI. If Shelby wants us to read his shit then he can follow the fucking rules.

 Nah, I'm good.  I just need some time off work
 

Yes, it is out of context with the reality of the price now and in fact, it refers to $ 6k, although I associated it at the time that Bitcoin began to grow from $ 6k quickly (But I forgot the detail that could have been possibly before of April 1) .Thanks for the clarification JayJuanGee .. Possibly the article seemed relevant to those statements of the interview to show the growth it had from that moment until now.

sorry to hear that Homer, nothing serious I hope

 Thank you guys, I appreciate the praise and the encouragement.  I've been rather busy lately though and I'm not sure I'll have the time to make something hat-related before the contest deadline.  I'm waiting for some inspiration from the muses but lately, I've only been visited by Melpomene. 

As I understand, mimblewinble is not a coin but privacy developments which were interesting as it related to Bitcoin's development and likely to be on a prudent speculator's radar no?  Especially considering Bitcoin's privacy design?  

Edit: Thanks for the link @rdbase  snicker, mimblewimble.  Bunch of candy bar eating nerds making these up? 

This scenario could work or not? I like it  
Is it possible that it goes down?


OR the bearish scenario

https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/gZVAxiBa-BITCOIN-price-Prediction-in-2020-Year-BTC-in-Big-Channel/

hahahahahaha

I am saying  that people try, and  people have tried, and you are people who have tried.  I know.  Largely, I remember.

You see.  It did not work.   

Of course, you can try harder.  I am not going to try to stop you from trying harder, yet just like with bitcoin, no guarantees.  Past performance does not guarantee future results.